关于心动图(CTG)生理解释的国际专家共识声明:第一次修订(2024 年)。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.034
Edwin Chandraharan , Susana Pereira , Tullio Ghi , Anna Gracia Perez-Bonfils , Stefania Fieni , Yan-Ju Jia , Katherine Griffiths , Suganya Sukumaran , Caron Ingram , Katharine Reeves , Mareike Bolten , Katrine Loser , Elena Carreras , Anna Suy , Itziar Garcia-Ruiz , Letizia Galli , Ahmed Zaima
{"title":"关于心动图(CTG)生理解释的国际专家共识声明:第一次修订(2024 年)。","authors":"Edwin Chandraharan ,&nbsp;Susana Pereira ,&nbsp;Tullio Ghi ,&nbsp;Anna Gracia Perez-Bonfils ,&nbsp;Stefania Fieni ,&nbsp;Yan-Ju Jia ,&nbsp;Katherine Griffiths ,&nbsp;Suganya Sukumaran ,&nbsp;Caron Ingram ,&nbsp;Katharine Reeves ,&nbsp;Mareike Bolten ,&nbsp;Katrine Loser ,&nbsp;Elena Carreras ,&nbsp;Anna Suy ,&nbsp;Itziar Garcia-Ruiz ,&nbsp;Letizia Galli ,&nbsp;Ahmed Zaima","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The first international consensus guideline on physiological interpretation of cardiotocograph (CTG) produced by 44 CTG experts from 14 countries was published in 2018. This guideline ensured a paradigm shift from classifying CTG by arbitrarily grouping certain features of the fetal heart rate into different “categories”, and then, randomly combining them to arrive at an overall classification of CTG traces into “Normal, Suspicious and Pathological” (or Category I, II and III) to a classification which is based on the understanding of fetal pathophysiology. The guideline recommended the recognition of different types of fetal hypoxia, and the determination of features of fetal compensatory responses as well as decompensation to ongoing hypoxic stress on the CTG trace. Since its first publication in 2018, there have been several scientific publications relating physiological interpretation of CTG, especially relating to features indicative of autonomic instability due to hypoxic stress (i.e., the ZigZag pattern), and of fetal inflammation. Moreover, emerging evidence has suggested improvement in maternal and perinatal outcomes in maternity units which had implemented physiological interpretation of CTG. Therefore, the guideline on Physiological Interpretation of CTG has been revised to incorporate new scientific evidence, and the interpretation table has been expanded to include features of chorioamnionitis and relative utero-placental insufficiency of labour (RUPI-L).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"302 ","pages":"Pages 346-355"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International expert consensus statement on physiological interpretation of cardiotocograph (CTG): First revision (2024)\",\"authors\":\"Edwin Chandraharan ,&nbsp;Susana Pereira ,&nbsp;Tullio Ghi ,&nbsp;Anna Gracia Perez-Bonfils ,&nbsp;Stefania Fieni ,&nbsp;Yan-Ju Jia ,&nbsp;Katherine Griffiths ,&nbsp;Suganya Sukumaran ,&nbsp;Caron Ingram ,&nbsp;Katharine Reeves ,&nbsp;Mareike Bolten ,&nbsp;Katrine Loser ,&nbsp;Elena Carreras ,&nbsp;Anna Suy ,&nbsp;Itziar Garcia-Ruiz ,&nbsp;Letizia Galli ,&nbsp;Ahmed Zaima\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The first international consensus guideline on physiological interpretation of cardiotocograph (CTG) produced by 44 CTG experts from 14 countries was published in 2018. This guideline ensured a paradigm shift from classifying CTG by arbitrarily grouping certain features of the fetal heart rate into different “categories”, and then, randomly combining them to arrive at an overall classification of CTG traces into “Normal, Suspicious and Pathological” (or Category I, II and III) to a classification which is based on the understanding of fetal pathophysiology. The guideline recommended the recognition of different types of fetal hypoxia, and the determination of features of fetal compensatory responses as well as decompensation to ongoing hypoxic stress on the CTG trace. Since its first publication in 2018, there have been several scientific publications relating physiological interpretation of CTG, especially relating to features indicative of autonomic instability due to hypoxic stress (i.e., the ZigZag pattern), and of fetal inflammation. Moreover, emerging evidence has suggested improvement in maternal and perinatal outcomes in maternity units which had implemented physiological interpretation of CTG. Therefore, the guideline on Physiological Interpretation of CTG has been revised to incorporate new scientific evidence, and the interpretation table has been expanded to include features of chorioamnionitis and relative utero-placental insufficiency of labour (RUPI-L).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology\",\"volume\":\"302 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 346-355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524005281\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524005281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2018 年,由来自 14 个国家的 44 位 CTG 专家共同制定的首份国际共识指南《心动图(CTG)生理解读指南》正式发布。该指南确保了 CTG 分类范式的转变,从任意将胎儿心率的某些特征归为不同的 "类别",然后随机组合,得出 CTG 迹线的 "正常、可疑和病理"(或 I、II 和 III 类)总体分类,转变为基于对胎儿病理生理学的理解进行分类。该指南建议识别不同类型的胎儿缺氧,确定胎儿代偿反应的特征,以及 CTG 迹线上持续缺氧应激的失代偿。自 2018 年首次发表以来,已有多篇科学出版物对 CTG 进行了生理学解读,尤其是有关缺氧应激导致的自主神经不稳定(即 ZigZag 模式)和胎儿炎症的指示特征。此外,新的证据表明,在实施 CTG 生理解读的产科病房中,孕产妇和围产期结果均有所改善。因此,我们对 CTG 生理判读指南进行了修订,以纳入新的科学证据,并扩展了判读表,以纳入绒毛膜羊膜炎和相对子宫胎盘功能不全(RUPI-L)的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
International expert consensus statement on physiological interpretation of cardiotocograph (CTG): First revision (2024)
The first international consensus guideline on physiological interpretation of cardiotocograph (CTG) produced by 44 CTG experts from 14 countries was published in 2018. This guideline ensured a paradigm shift from classifying CTG by arbitrarily grouping certain features of the fetal heart rate into different “categories”, and then, randomly combining them to arrive at an overall classification of CTG traces into “Normal, Suspicious and Pathological” (or Category I, II and III) to a classification which is based on the understanding of fetal pathophysiology. The guideline recommended the recognition of different types of fetal hypoxia, and the determination of features of fetal compensatory responses as well as decompensation to ongoing hypoxic stress on the CTG trace. Since its first publication in 2018, there have been several scientific publications relating physiological interpretation of CTG, especially relating to features indicative of autonomic instability due to hypoxic stress (i.e., the ZigZag pattern), and of fetal inflammation. Moreover, emerging evidence has suggested improvement in maternal and perinatal outcomes in maternity units which had implemented physiological interpretation of CTG. Therefore, the guideline on Physiological Interpretation of CTG has been revised to incorporate new scientific evidence, and the interpretation table has been expanded to include features of chorioamnionitis and relative utero-placental insufficiency of labour (RUPI-L).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Inside Back Cover - Editors with images Corrigendum to “Prophylactic tranexamic acid during myomectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials” [Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 276 (2022) 82–91] Survival outcomes of endometrial cancer patients with disease involving the lower uterine segment: A meta-analysis Outcomes of first assisted reproductive technology treatment in infertile women with and without antinuclear antibodies: A prospective cohort study Maternal and neonatal outcomes of prolonged second stage of labor with delayed pushing: A study of French Perinatal practices before and after guideline changes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1