现实世界中鲁非那胺安全性概况的比例失调分析:对美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统数据库的评估。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2412237
Lingman Wang, Jianxiong Gui, Xiaofang Zhang, Bing Tian, Linxue Meng, Jie Liu, Li Jiang
{"title":"现实世界中鲁非那胺安全性概况的比例失调分析:对美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统数据库的评估。","authors":"Lingman Wang, Jianxiong Gui, Xiaofang Zhang, Bing Tian, Linxue Meng, Jie Liu, Li Jiang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rufinamide (RUF) is an antiepileptic drug recently introduced for managing seizures in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), but its adverse reactions are not well understood. This study aims to evaluate RUF's safety profile using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Disproportionality analysis was conducted to assess RUF-associated adverse drug events (ADEs), using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma-Poisson shrinker (MGPS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected 338 ADE reports related to RUF. Nervous system disorders were the most frequently reported signals, and several new ADEs were detected, including atonic seizures, sudden unexplained death in epilepsy, seizure clusters, multi-drug resistance, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Nearly half of the ADEs in pediatric patients were psychological or neurological. Disproportionality analysis within 4 weeks of treatment showed high RORs for QT shortening, sudden death, and atonic seizures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study revealed prospective signals of new ADEs linked to RUF as well as revealed that both prescribers and patients were more conscious of the risks involved in its clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disproportionality analysis of the safety profile of rufinamide in the real world: an evaluation of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.\",\"authors\":\"Lingman Wang, Jianxiong Gui, Xiaofang Zhang, Bing Tian, Linxue Meng, Jie Liu, Li Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rufinamide (RUF) is an antiepileptic drug recently introduced for managing seizures in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), but its adverse reactions are not well understood. This study aims to evaluate RUF's safety profile using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Disproportionality analysis was conducted to assess RUF-associated adverse drug events (ADEs), using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma-Poisson shrinker (MGPS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected 338 ADE reports related to RUF. Nervous system disorders were the most frequently reported signals, and several new ADEs were detected, including atonic seizures, sudden unexplained death in epilepsy, seizure clusters, multi-drug resistance, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Nearly half of the ADEs in pediatric patients were psychological or neurological. Disproportionality analysis within 4 weeks of treatment showed high RORs for QT shortening, sudden death, and atonic seizures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study revealed prospective signals of new ADEs linked to RUF as well as revealed that both prescribers and patients were more conscious of the risks involved in its clinical use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2412237\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2412237","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抗癫痫药物鲁非那胺(RUF)最近被用于缓解伦诺克斯-加斯豪特综合征(LGS)患者的癫痫发作。然而,人们对其不良反应知之甚少。本研究旨在通过 FDA 不良事件报告系统 (FAERS) 数据库中的数据,探究、评估和分享有关 RUF 安全性的证据:方法:通过计算报告几率(ROR)、比例报告率(PRR)、贝叶斯置信度传播神经网络(BCPN)和多项目伽马-泊松收缩器(MGPS),对RUF相关药物不良事件(ADE)的比例失调分析进行评估:共收集到 338 份与 RUF 相关的 ADE 报告。神经系统疾病是最常见的阳性信号。值得注意的是,还发现了新的意外重大 ADE。其中,失张力性癫痫发作、不明原因的癫痫猝死、癫痫发作群、多重耐药性、史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和其他可能的新信号值得关注。对所发现信号的年龄特异性差异进行的研究表明,在接受 RUF 治疗的儿童中观察到的 ADE 中,近一半被归类为心理或神经系统疾病。我们对治疗后 4 周内的 ADE 进行了比例失调分析,发现心电图 Qt 缩短、癫痫患者不明原因猝死和失张力癫痫发作的 ROR 较高:我们的研究揭示了与 RUF 相关的新 ADE 的前瞻性信号,并显示处方者和患者都更加意识到临床使用 RUF 所涉及的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disproportionality analysis of the safety profile of rufinamide in the real world: an evaluation of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.

Background: Rufinamide (RUF) is an antiepileptic drug recently introduced for managing seizures in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), but its adverse reactions are not well understood. This study aims to evaluate RUF's safety profile using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods: Disproportionality analysis was conducted to assess RUF-associated adverse drug events (ADEs), using reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma-Poisson shrinker (MGPS).

Results: We collected 338 ADE reports related to RUF. Nervous system disorders were the most frequently reported signals, and several new ADEs were detected, including atonic seizures, sudden unexplained death in epilepsy, seizure clusters, multi-drug resistance, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Nearly half of the ADEs in pediatric patients were psychological or neurological. Disproportionality analysis within 4 weeks of treatment showed high RORs for QT shortening, sudden death, and atonic seizures.

Conclusions: Our study revealed prospective signals of new ADEs linked to RUF as well as revealed that both prescribers and patients were more conscious of the risks involved in its clinical use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
Examining the safety of belimumab, especially in children: an analysis of real-world pharmacovigilance data from the US FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database. Safety concerns of aztreonam: a real-world disproportionality analysis based on FDA adverse event reporting system. Pharmacovigilance insights into drug-induced cystitis: analysis of FDA data from 2004 to 2024. Increased reporting of accidental overdose with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a population-based study. Mining and influencing factors analysis of sacituzumab govitecan adverse drug event based on FAERS database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1