经颅直流电刺激结合认知训练对健康老年人工作记忆影响的荟萃分析。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-09-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2024.1454755
Yanxin Lv, Shuo Wu, Michael A Nitsche, Tian Yue, Volker R Zschorlich, Fengxue Qi
{"title":"经颅直流电刺激结合认知训练对健康老年人工作记忆影响的荟萃分析。","authors":"Yanxin Lv, Shuo Wu, Michael A Nitsche, Tian Yue, Volker R Zschorlich, Fengxue Qi","doi":"10.3389/fnagi.2024.1454755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Working memory (WM) loss, which can lead to a loss of independence, and declines in the quality of life of older adults, is becoming an increasingly prominent issue affecting the ageing population. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, is emerging as a potential alternative to pharmacological treatments that shows promise for enhancing WM capacity and May enhance the effects of cognitive training (CT) interventions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this meta-analysis was to explore how different tDCS protocols in combination with CT enhanced WM in healthy older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the effects of tDCS combined with CT on WM in healthy older adults were retrieved from the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library databases. The search time period ranged from database inception to January 15, 2024. Methodological quality of the trials was assessed using the risk-of-bias criteria for RCTs from the Cochrane Collaboration Network, and RevMan 5.3 (Cochrane, London, United Kingdom) was used for the meta-analysis of the final literature outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs with a total of 323 participants were ultimately included. The results of the meta-analysis show that tDCS combined with CT statistically significantly improves WM performance compared to the control sham stimulation group in healthy older adults [standard mean difference (SMD) = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.11-0.59, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>Z</i> = 2.86, <i>p</i> = 0.004]. The first subgroup analysis indicated that, when the stimulus intensity was 2 mA, a statistically significant improvement in WM performance in healthy older adults was achieved (SMD = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.08-0.70, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 6%, <i>Z</i> = 2.46, <i>p</i> = 0.01). The second subgroup analysis showed that long-term intervention (≥ 10 sessions) with tDCS combined with CT statistically significantly improved WM compared to the control group in healthy older adults (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.22-1.21, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>Z</i> = 2.85, <i>p</i> = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>tDCS combined with CT statistically significantly improves WM in healthy older adults. For the stimulus parameters, long-term interventions (≥ 10 sessions) with a stimulation intensity of 2 mA are the most effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":12450,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","volume":"16 ","pages":"1454755"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-analysis of the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with cognitive training on working memory in healthy older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Yanxin Lv, Shuo Wu, Michael A Nitsche, Tian Yue, Volker R Zschorlich, Fengxue Qi\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnagi.2024.1454755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Working memory (WM) loss, which can lead to a loss of independence, and declines in the quality of life of older adults, is becoming an increasingly prominent issue affecting the ageing population. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, is emerging as a potential alternative to pharmacological treatments that shows promise for enhancing WM capacity and May enhance the effects of cognitive training (CT) interventions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this meta-analysis was to explore how different tDCS protocols in combination with CT enhanced WM in healthy older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the effects of tDCS combined with CT on WM in healthy older adults were retrieved from the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library databases. The search time period ranged from database inception to January 15, 2024. Methodological quality of the trials was assessed using the risk-of-bias criteria for RCTs from the Cochrane Collaboration Network, and RevMan 5.3 (Cochrane, London, United Kingdom) was used for the meta-analysis of the final literature outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs with a total of 323 participants were ultimately included. The results of the meta-analysis show that tDCS combined with CT statistically significantly improves WM performance compared to the control sham stimulation group in healthy older adults [standard mean difference (SMD) = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.11-0.59, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>Z</i> = 2.86, <i>p</i> = 0.004]. The first subgroup analysis indicated that, when the stimulus intensity was 2 mA, a statistically significant improvement in WM performance in healthy older adults was achieved (SMD = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.08-0.70, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 6%, <i>Z</i> = 2.46, <i>p</i> = 0.01). The second subgroup analysis showed that long-term intervention (≥ 10 sessions) with tDCS combined with CT statistically significantly improved WM compared to the control group in healthy older adults (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.22-1.21, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>Z</i> = 2.85, <i>p</i> = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>tDCS combined with CT statistically significantly improves WM in healthy older adults. For the stimulus parameters, long-term interventions (≥ 10 sessions) with a stimulation intensity of 2 mA are the most effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1454755\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456488/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1454755\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1454755","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:工作记忆(WM)的丧失可能导致老年人丧失独立性和生活质量下降,这已成为影响老龄人口的一个日益突出的问题。经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种非侵入性脑刺激技术,正在成为药物治疗的潜在替代方法,有望增强工作记忆能力,并可能增强认知训练(CT)干预的效果:本荟萃分析旨在探讨不同的 tDCS 方案与 CT 结合如何增强健康老年人的 WM:从 Web of Science、PubMed、Embase、Scopus 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中检索了探讨 tDCS 结合 CT 对健康老年人 WM 影响的随机对照试验 (RCT)。检索时间从数据库建立之初到 2024 年 1 月 15 日。使用 Cochrane 协作网络的 RCT 偏倚风险标准评估试验的方法学质量,并使用 RevMan 5.3(Cochrane,英国伦敦)对最终文献结果进行荟萃分析:结果:最终纳入了六项研究,共有 323 人参与。荟萃分析结果表明,与假刺激对照组相比,tDCS 联合 CT 在统计学上显著提高了健康老年人的 WM 性能[标准平均差 (SMD) = 0.35,95% CI:0.11-0.59,I 2 = 0%,Z = 2.86,P = 0.004]。第一项亚组分析表明,当刺激强度为 2 mA 时,健康老年人的 WM 表现有显著的统计学改善(SMD = 0.39,95% CI:0.08-0.70,I 2 = 6%,Z = 2.46,p = 0.01)。第二项亚组分析显示,与对照组相比,tDCS 联合 CT 的长期干预(≥ 10 次)在统计学上显著改善了健康老年人的 WM(SMD = 0.72,95% CI:0.22-1.21,I 2 = 0%,Z = 2.85,p = 0.004)。就刺激参数而言,刺激强度为 2 mA 的长期干预(≥ 10 次)最为有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A meta-analysis of the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with cognitive training on working memory in healthy older adults.

Background: Working memory (WM) loss, which can lead to a loss of independence, and declines in the quality of life of older adults, is becoming an increasingly prominent issue affecting the ageing population. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, is emerging as a potential alternative to pharmacological treatments that shows promise for enhancing WM capacity and May enhance the effects of cognitive training (CT) interventions.

Objective: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to explore how different tDCS protocols in combination with CT enhanced WM in healthy older adults.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the effects of tDCS combined with CT on WM in healthy older adults were retrieved from the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library databases. The search time period ranged from database inception to January 15, 2024. Methodological quality of the trials was assessed using the risk-of-bias criteria for RCTs from the Cochrane Collaboration Network, and RevMan 5.3 (Cochrane, London, United Kingdom) was used for the meta-analysis of the final literature outcomes.

Results: Six RCTs with a total of 323 participants were ultimately included. The results of the meta-analysis show that tDCS combined with CT statistically significantly improves WM performance compared to the control sham stimulation group in healthy older adults [standard mean difference (SMD) = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.11-0.59, I 2 = 0%, Z = 2.86, p = 0.004]. The first subgroup analysis indicated that, when the stimulus intensity was 2 mA, a statistically significant improvement in WM performance in healthy older adults was achieved (SMD = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.08-0.70, I 2 = 6%, Z = 2.46, p = 0.01). The second subgroup analysis showed that long-term intervention (≥ 10 sessions) with tDCS combined with CT statistically significantly improved WM compared to the control group in healthy older adults (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.22-1.21, I 2 = 0%, Z = 2.85, p = 0.004).

Conclusion: tDCS combined with CT statistically significantly improves WM in healthy older adults. For the stimulus parameters, long-term interventions (≥ 10 sessions) with a stimulation intensity of 2 mA are the most effective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
1426
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the mechanisms of Central Nervous System aging and age-related neural diseases. Specialty Chief Editor Thomas Wisniewski at the New York University School of Medicine is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Somatosensory integration in robot-assisted motor restoration post-stroke. Clinical and cognitive features associated with psychosis in Parkinson's disease: a longitudinal study. Association of serum klotho with cognitive function among individuals with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Causal association between Parkinson's disease and cancer: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Network-based statistics reveals an enhanced subnetwork in prefrontal cortex in mild cognitive impairment: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1