测序平台对使用 Hawk-Seq™ 检测化学变异灵敏度的影响。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Genes and Environment Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1186/s41021-024-00313-9
Sayaka Hosoi, Takako Hirose, Shoji Matsumura, Yuki Otsubo, Kazutoshi Saito, Masaaki Miyazawa, Takayoshi Suzuki, Kenichi Masumura, Kei-Ichi Sugiyama
{"title":"测序平台对使用 Hawk-Seq™ 检测化学变异灵敏度的影响。","authors":"Sayaka Hosoi, Takako Hirose, Shoji Matsumura, Yuki Otsubo, Kazutoshi Saito, Masaaki Miyazawa, Takayoshi Suzuki, Kenichi Masumura, Kei-Ichi Sugiyama","doi":"10.1186/s41021-024-00313-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Error-corrected next-generation sequencing (ecNGS) technologies have enabled the direct evaluation of genome-wide mutations after exposure to mutagens. Previously, we reported an ecNGS methodology, Hawk-Seq™, and demonstrated its utility in evaluating mutagenicity. The evaluation of technical transferability is essential to further evaluate the reliability of ecNGS-based assays. However, cutting-edge sequencing platforms are continually evolving, which can affect the sensitivity of ecNGS. Therefore, the effect of differences in sequencing instruments on mutation data quality should be evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We assessed the performance of four sequencing platforms (HiSeq2500, NovaSeq6000, NextSeq2000, and DNBSEQ-G400) with the Hawk-Seq™ protocol for mutagenicity evaluation using DNA samples from mouse bone marrow exposed to benzo[a]pyrene (BP). The overall mutation (OM) frequencies per 10<sup>6</sup> bp in vehicle-treated samples were 0.22, 0.36, 0.46, and 0.26 for HiSeq2500, NovaSeq6000, NextSeq2000, and DNBSEQ-G400, respectively. The OM frequency of NextSeq2000 was significantly higher than that of HiSeq2500, suggesting the difference to be based on the platform. The relatively higher value in NextSeq2000 was a consequence of the G:C to C:G mutations in NextSeq2000 data (0.67 per 10<sup>6</sup> G:C bp), which was higher than the mean of the four platforms by a ca. of 0.25 per 10<sup>6</sup> G:C bp. A clear dose-dependent increase in G:C to T:A mutation frequencies was observed in all four sequencing platforms after BP exposure. The cosine similarity values of the 96-dimensional trinucleotide mutation patterns between HiSeq and the three other platforms were 0.93, 0.95, and 0.92 for NovaSeq, NextSeq, and DNBSeq, respectively. These results suggest that all platforms can provide equivalent data that reflect the characteristics of the mutagens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All platforms sensitively detected mutagen-induced mutations using the Hawk-Seq™ analysis. The substitution types and frequencies of the background errors differed depending on the platform. The effects of sequencing platforms on mutagenicity evaluation should be assessed before experimentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12709,"journal":{"name":"Genes and Environment","volume":"46 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of sequencing platforms on the sensitivity of chemical mutation detection using Hawk-Seq™.\",\"authors\":\"Sayaka Hosoi, Takako Hirose, Shoji Matsumura, Yuki Otsubo, Kazutoshi Saito, Masaaki Miyazawa, Takayoshi Suzuki, Kenichi Masumura, Kei-Ichi Sugiyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41021-024-00313-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Error-corrected next-generation sequencing (ecNGS) technologies have enabled the direct evaluation of genome-wide mutations after exposure to mutagens. Previously, we reported an ecNGS methodology, Hawk-Seq™, and demonstrated its utility in evaluating mutagenicity. The evaluation of technical transferability is essential to further evaluate the reliability of ecNGS-based assays. However, cutting-edge sequencing platforms are continually evolving, which can affect the sensitivity of ecNGS. Therefore, the effect of differences in sequencing instruments on mutation data quality should be evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We assessed the performance of four sequencing platforms (HiSeq2500, NovaSeq6000, NextSeq2000, and DNBSEQ-G400) with the Hawk-Seq™ protocol for mutagenicity evaluation using DNA samples from mouse bone marrow exposed to benzo[a]pyrene (BP). The overall mutation (OM) frequencies per 10<sup>6</sup> bp in vehicle-treated samples were 0.22, 0.36, 0.46, and 0.26 for HiSeq2500, NovaSeq6000, NextSeq2000, and DNBSEQ-G400, respectively. The OM frequency of NextSeq2000 was significantly higher than that of HiSeq2500, suggesting the difference to be based on the platform. The relatively higher value in NextSeq2000 was a consequence of the G:C to C:G mutations in NextSeq2000 data (0.67 per 10<sup>6</sup> G:C bp), which was higher than the mean of the four platforms by a ca. of 0.25 per 10<sup>6</sup> G:C bp. A clear dose-dependent increase in G:C to T:A mutation frequencies was observed in all four sequencing platforms after BP exposure. The cosine similarity values of the 96-dimensional trinucleotide mutation patterns between HiSeq and the three other platforms were 0.93, 0.95, and 0.92 for NovaSeq, NextSeq, and DNBSeq, respectively. These results suggest that all platforms can provide equivalent data that reflect the characteristics of the mutagens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All platforms sensitively detected mutagen-induced mutations using the Hawk-Seq™ analysis. The substitution types and frequencies of the background errors differed depending on the platform. The effects of sequencing platforms on mutagenicity evaluation should be assessed before experimentation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genes and Environment\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462924/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genes and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41021-024-00313-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genes and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41021-024-00313-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:误差校正新一代测序(ecNGS)技术能够直接评估暴露于诱变剂后的全基因组突变。此前,我们报道了一种 ecNGS 方法 Hawk-Seq™,并证明了它在评估致突变性方面的实用性。要进一步评估基于 ecNGS 的检测方法的可靠性,对技术可转移性的评估至关重要。然而,前沿测序平台在不断发展,这会影响 ecNGS 的灵敏度。因此,应该评估测序仪器的差异对突变数据质量的影响:结果:我们利用暴露于苯并[a]芘(BP)的小鼠骨髓 DNA 样本,评估了四种测序平台(HiSeq2500、NovaSeq6000、NextSeq2000 和 DNBSEQ-G400)的性能,并采用 Hawk-Seq™ 方案进行了诱变性评估。在经车辆处理的样本中,HiSeq2500、NovaSeq6000、NextSeq2000 和 DNBSEQ-G400 每 106 bp 的总突变(OM)频率分别为 0.22、0.36、0.46 和 0.26。NextSeq2000的OM频率明显高于HiSeq2500,这表明差异是基于平台的。NextSeq2000的数值相对较高是因为NextSeq2000数据中的G:C到C:G突变(每106个G:C bp中有0.67个),比四个平台的平均值高出约每106个G:C bp中0.25个。在暴露于 BP 后,所有四个测序平台的 G:C 到 T:A 突变频率都出现了明显的剂量依赖性增加。HiSeq和其他三个平台的96维三核苷酸突变模式的余弦相似值分别为0.93、0.95和0.92(NovaSeq、NextSeq和DNBSeq)。这些结果表明,所有平台都能提供反映诱变剂特征的等效数据:结论:使用 Hawk-Seq™ 分析,所有平台都能灵敏地检测到诱变剂诱导的突变。不同平台的替换类型和背景误差频率各不相同。实验前应评估测序平台对诱变性评估的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of sequencing platforms on the sensitivity of chemical mutation detection using Hawk-Seq™.

Background: Error-corrected next-generation sequencing (ecNGS) technologies have enabled the direct evaluation of genome-wide mutations after exposure to mutagens. Previously, we reported an ecNGS methodology, Hawk-Seq™, and demonstrated its utility in evaluating mutagenicity. The evaluation of technical transferability is essential to further evaluate the reliability of ecNGS-based assays. However, cutting-edge sequencing platforms are continually evolving, which can affect the sensitivity of ecNGS. Therefore, the effect of differences in sequencing instruments on mutation data quality should be evaluated.

Results: We assessed the performance of four sequencing platforms (HiSeq2500, NovaSeq6000, NextSeq2000, and DNBSEQ-G400) with the Hawk-Seq™ protocol for mutagenicity evaluation using DNA samples from mouse bone marrow exposed to benzo[a]pyrene (BP). The overall mutation (OM) frequencies per 106 bp in vehicle-treated samples were 0.22, 0.36, 0.46, and 0.26 for HiSeq2500, NovaSeq6000, NextSeq2000, and DNBSEQ-G400, respectively. The OM frequency of NextSeq2000 was significantly higher than that of HiSeq2500, suggesting the difference to be based on the platform. The relatively higher value in NextSeq2000 was a consequence of the G:C to C:G mutations in NextSeq2000 data (0.67 per 106 G:C bp), which was higher than the mean of the four platforms by a ca. of 0.25 per 106 G:C bp. A clear dose-dependent increase in G:C to T:A mutation frequencies was observed in all four sequencing platforms after BP exposure. The cosine similarity values of the 96-dimensional trinucleotide mutation patterns between HiSeq and the three other platforms were 0.93, 0.95, and 0.92 for NovaSeq, NextSeq, and DNBSeq, respectively. These results suggest that all platforms can provide equivalent data that reflect the characteristics of the mutagens.

Conclusions: All platforms sensitively detected mutagen-induced mutations using the Hawk-Seq™ analysis. The substitution types and frequencies of the background errors differed depending on the platform. The effects of sequencing platforms on mutagenicity evaluation should be assessed before experimentation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genes and Environment
Genes and Environment Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Genes and Environment is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that aims to accelerate communications among global scientists working in the field of genes and environment. The journal publishes articles across a broad range of topics including environmental mutagenesis and carcinogenesis, environmental genomics and epigenetics, molecular epidemiology, genetic toxicology and regulatory sciences. Topics published in the journal include, but are not limited to, mutagenesis and anti-mutagenesis in bacteria; genotoxicity in mammalian somatic cells; genotoxicity in germ cells; replication and repair; DNA damage; metabolic activation and inactivation; water and air pollution; ROS, NO and photoactivation; pharmaceuticals and anticancer agents; radiation; endocrine disrupters; indirect mutagenesis; threshold; new techniques for environmental mutagenesis studies; DNA methylation (enzymatic); structure activity relationship; chemoprevention of cancer; regulatory science. Genetic toxicology including risk evaluation for human health, validation studies on testing methods and subjects of guidelines for regulation of chemicals are also within its scope.
期刊最新文献
Structure-mutagenicity relationships on quinoline and indole analogues in the Ames test. Elimination of mutagenic contaminants from water using cellulose bearing ferrous-phthalocyanine. Multistage carcinogenesis in occupational cholangiocarcinoma: the impact of clonal expansion and risk estimation. Effect of sequencing platforms on the sensitivity of chemical mutation detection using Hawk-Seq™. Split MutT prevents the mutator phenotype of mutT-deficient Escherichia coli.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1