Wouter Schallig , Ytjanda Sloot , Milou M. van der Schaaf , Sicco A. Bus
{"title":"使用动态超声波评估跑步过程中的跟腱力学:对跑步模式和肌肉肌腱连接跟踪的影响。","authors":"Wouter Schallig , Ytjanda Sloot , Milou M. van der Schaaf , Sicco A. Bus","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achilles tendon strain can be quantified using dynamic ultrasound, but its use in running is limited. Minimal effects on running pattern and acceptable test–retest reliability of muscle–tendon junction (MTJ) tracking are prerequisites for ultrasound use during running. We aimed to assess (i) the effect of wearing an ultrasound transducer on running pattern and (ii) the test–retest reliability of MTJ tracking during running. Sixteen long-distance runners (nine injury-free, seven with Achilles tendinopathy) ran at different speeds on an instrumented treadmill with a 10-camera system tracking skin-mounted retroreflective markers, first without and then with an ultrasound transducer attached to the lower leg to track the MTJ of the gastrocnemius medialis. Spatiotemporal parameters, joint kinematics and kinetics were compared between conditions using mixed ANOVAs and paired t-tests. MTJ tracking was performed manually twice by three raters in ten participants. Variability and standard error of measurement (SEM) quantified the inter- and intra-tester test–retest reliability. The running pattern was not affected by wearing the ultrasound transducer, except for significantly less knee flexion during midstance (1.6°) and midswing (2.9°) found when wearing the transducer. Inter-rater and intra-rater SEMs for MTJ tracking to assess the tendon strain (0.43%, and 0.56%, respectively) were about four times as low as between-group differences presented in literature. The minimal effects found on the running pattern and acceptable test–retest reliability indicates that dynamic ultrasound during running can be appropriately used to study Achilles tendon mechanics and thereby help improve our understanding of Achilles tendon behavior during running, injury development and recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 112344"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using dynamic ultrasound to assess Achilles tendon mechanics during running: The effect on running pattern and muscle–tendon junction tracking\",\"authors\":\"Wouter Schallig , Ytjanda Sloot , Milou M. van der Schaaf , Sicco A. Bus\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Achilles tendon strain can be quantified using dynamic ultrasound, but its use in running is limited. Minimal effects on running pattern and acceptable test–retest reliability of muscle–tendon junction (MTJ) tracking are prerequisites for ultrasound use during running. We aimed to assess (i) the effect of wearing an ultrasound transducer on running pattern and (ii) the test–retest reliability of MTJ tracking during running. Sixteen long-distance runners (nine injury-free, seven with Achilles tendinopathy) ran at different speeds on an instrumented treadmill with a 10-camera system tracking skin-mounted retroreflective markers, first without and then with an ultrasound transducer attached to the lower leg to track the MTJ of the gastrocnemius medialis. Spatiotemporal parameters, joint kinematics and kinetics were compared between conditions using mixed ANOVAs and paired t-tests. MTJ tracking was performed manually twice by three raters in ten participants. Variability and standard error of measurement (SEM) quantified the inter- and intra-tester test–retest reliability. The running pattern was not affected by wearing the ultrasound transducer, except for significantly less knee flexion during midstance (1.6°) and midswing (2.9°) found when wearing the transducer. Inter-rater and intra-rater SEMs for MTJ tracking to assess the tendon strain (0.43%, and 0.56%, respectively) were about four times as low as between-group differences presented in literature. The minimal effects found on the running pattern and acceptable test–retest reliability indicates that dynamic ultrasound during running can be appropriately used to study Achilles tendon mechanics and thereby help improve our understanding of Achilles tendon behavior during running, injury development and recovery.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"176 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024004226\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024004226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using dynamic ultrasound to assess Achilles tendon mechanics during running: The effect on running pattern and muscle–tendon junction tracking
Achilles tendon strain can be quantified using dynamic ultrasound, but its use in running is limited. Minimal effects on running pattern and acceptable test–retest reliability of muscle–tendon junction (MTJ) tracking are prerequisites for ultrasound use during running. We aimed to assess (i) the effect of wearing an ultrasound transducer on running pattern and (ii) the test–retest reliability of MTJ tracking during running. Sixteen long-distance runners (nine injury-free, seven with Achilles tendinopathy) ran at different speeds on an instrumented treadmill with a 10-camera system tracking skin-mounted retroreflective markers, first without and then with an ultrasound transducer attached to the lower leg to track the MTJ of the gastrocnemius medialis. Spatiotemporal parameters, joint kinematics and kinetics were compared between conditions using mixed ANOVAs and paired t-tests. MTJ tracking was performed manually twice by three raters in ten participants. Variability and standard error of measurement (SEM) quantified the inter- and intra-tester test–retest reliability. The running pattern was not affected by wearing the ultrasound transducer, except for significantly less knee flexion during midstance (1.6°) and midswing (2.9°) found when wearing the transducer. Inter-rater and intra-rater SEMs for MTJ tracking to assess the tendon strain (0.43%, and 0.56%, respectively) were about four times as low as between-group differences presented in literature. The minimal effects found on the running pattern and acceptable test–retest reliability indicates that dynamic ultrasound during running can be appropriately used to study Achilles tendon mechanics and thereby help improve our understanding of Achilles tendon behavior during running, injury development and recovery.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.