对早期前列腺癌进行主动监测的男性进行靶向活检即可。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000004265
Mary O Fakunle, Janet E Cowan, Samuel L Washington, Katsuto Shinohara, Hao G Nguyen, Peter R Carroll
{"title":"对早期前列腺癌进行主动监测的男性进行靶向活检即可。","authors":"Mary O Fakunle, Janet E Cowan, Samuel L Washington, Katsuto Shinohara, Hao G Nguyen, Peter R Carroll","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Serial biopsy is a mainstay for patients on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer. multiparametric MRI targeting has become a standard. It is unclear whether targeted biopsy alone reliably identifies the dominant lesion, thereby obviating the need for systematic sampling.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Participants enrolled in AS with early-stage prostate cancer (PSA <20, cT1-2, GG1-2) and underwent 2+ systematic biopsy sessions with or without magnetic resonance (MR)-targeted sampling. The findings for dominant Gleason Grade Group (GG) and tumor localization were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 821 men who underwent MR fusion biopsies, 82% were diagnosed with GG1 and 18% with GG2. Sixty-two percent had their first MR fusion biopsy as diagnostic or confirmatory. Across all fusion biopsies, MRI-targeted detection of GG and/or tumor location overlapped with systematic sampling for 95% of cases. For 5% of cases, systematic biopsy was unique in detecting GG and location outside the target. Most unique lesions detected outside the target had marginally aggressive features: 73% GG2 of low-volume and favorable histologic subtypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In men with MR fusion biopsies, targeting alone identified the dominant GG and location most of the time (95%); 25% of dominant lesions were contiguous to the target, suggesting that better sampling of the target improves detection. The remaining 5% of men had higher-grade, low-volume disease outside the targeted lesion, of which only 2% had aggressive risk features. MR fusion targeting, without systematic sampling, may be sufficient to monitor men on AS. Few high-risk cancers are missed, all of limited volume and favorable histology.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"34-39"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Targeted Biopsy Is Sufficient for Men on Active Surveillance for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Mary O Fakunle, Janet E Cowan, Samuel L Washington, Katsuto Shinohara, Hao G Nguyen, Peter R Carroll\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JU.0000000000004265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Serial biopsy is a mainstay for patients on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer. multiparametric MRI targeting has become a standard. It is unclear whether targeted biopsy alone reliably identifies the dominant lesion, thereby obviating the need for systematic sampling.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Participants enrolled in AS with early-stage prostate cancer (PSA <20, cT1-2, GG1-2) and underwent 2+ systematic biopsy sessions with or without magnetic resonance (MR)-targeted sampling. The findings for dominant Gleason Grade Group (GG) and tumor localization were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 821 men who underwent MR fusion biopsies, 82% were diagnosed with GG1 and 18% with GG2. Sixty-two percent had their first MR fusion biopsy as diagnostic or confirmatory. Across all fusion biopsies, MRI-targeted detection of GG and/or tumor location overlapped with systematic sampling for 95% of cases. For 5% of cases, systematic biopsy was unique in detecting GG and location outside the target. Most unique lesions detected outside the target had marginally aggressive features: 73% GG2 of low-volume and favorable histologic subtypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In men with MR fusion biopsies, targeting alone identified the dominant GG and location most of the time (95%); 25% of dominant lesions were contiguous to the target, suggesting that better sampling of the target improves detection. The remaining 5% of men had higher-grade, low-volume disease outside the targeted lesion, of which only 2% had aggressive risk features. MR fusion targeting, without systematic sampling, may be sufficient to monitor men on AS. Few high-risk cancers are missed, all of limited volume and favorable histology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"34-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004265\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004265","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:连续活检是前列腺癌主动监测(AS)患者的主要检查方法。目前还不清楚单独的靶向活检是否能可靠地确定主要病变,从而避免系统取样:入选 AS 的早期前列腺癌患者(PSA < 20、cT1-2、GG1-2)接受了 2 次以上的系统活检,无论是否进行了磁共振靶向取样。对主要格里森分级(GG)和肿瘤定位的结果进行了评估:在接受 MR 融合活检的 821 名男性中,82% 被诊断为 GG1,18% 被诊断为 GG2。62%的人进行了首次磁共振融合活检作为诊断或确诊。在所有融合活检中,95% 的病例的磁共振成像靶向检测 GG 和/或肿瘤位置与系统取样重叠。在5%的病例中,系统活检是唯一在靶点外检测到GG和肿瘤位置的方法。大多数在靶点外检测到的独特病变具有轻微侵袭性特征:73%的GG2体积小,组织学亚型良好:结论:在进行磁共振融合活检的男性中,大多数情况下(95%)仅通过靶向就能确定主要的GG和位置;25%的主要病变与靶点毗连,这表明对靶点进行更好的取样能提高检测率。其余5%的男性在靶病灶外有等级较高、体积较小的病变,其中只有2%具有侵袭性风险特征。核磁共振融合靶向检查无需系统取样,可能就足以监测接受强直性脊柱炎治疗的男性。漏诊的高风险癌症很少,都是体积有限且组织学良好的癌症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Targeted Biopsy Is Sufficient for Men on Active Surveillance for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer.

Purpose: Serial biopsy is a mainstay for patients on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer. multiparametric MRI targeting has become a standard. It is unclear whether targeted biopsy alone reliably identifies the dominant lesion, thereby obviating the need for systematic sampling.

Materials and methods: Participants enrolled in AS with early-stage prostate cancer (PSA <20, cT1-2, GG1-2) and underwent 2+ systematic biopsy sessions with or without magnetic resonance (MR)-targeted sampling. The findings for dominant Gleason Grade Group (GG) and tumor localization were assessed.

Results: Among 821 men who underwent MR fusion biopsies, 82% were diagnosed with GG1 and 18% with GG2. Sixty-two percent had their first MR fusion biopsy as diagnostic or confirmatory. Across all fusion biopsies, MRI-targeted detection of GG and/or tumor location overlapped with systematic sampling for 95% of cases. For 5% of cases, systematic biopsy was unique in detecting GG and location outside the target. Most unique lesions detected outside the target had marginally aggressive features: 73% GG2 of low-volume and favorable histologic subtypes.

Conclusions: In men with MR fusion biopsies, targeting alone identified the dominant GG and location most of the time (95%); 25% of dominant lesions were contiguous to the target, suggesting that better sampling of the target improves detection. The remaining 5% of men had higher-grade, low-volume disease outside the targeted lesion, of which only 2% had aggressive risk features. MR fusion targeting, without systematic sampling, may be sufficient to monitor men on AS. Few high-risk cancers are missed, all of limited volume and favorable histology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urology
Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
7.60%
发文量
3746
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Comment. Multi-Institutional Analysis of Surgery for Lichen Sclerosus-Induced Penile Urethral Stricture: Establishing Single-Stage Urethroplasty as a Primary Treatment Option. Editorial Comment. Letter: Artificial Intelligence as a Discriminator of Competence in Urological Training: Are We There? Editorial Comment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1