第三倍频程分析描述了声音再现的两个感知维度,以及由此产生的扬声器或耳机之间的整体感知差异。

IF 2.1 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ACOUSTICS Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1121/10.0030463
Nathan Szwarcberg, Mathieu Lavandier
{"title":"第三倍频程分析描述了声音再现的两个感知维度,以及由此产生的扬声器或耳机之间的整体感知差异。","authors":"Nathan Szwarcberg, Mathieu Lavandier","doi":"10.1121/10.0030463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many objective measurements have been proposed to evaluate sound reproduction, but it is often difficult to link measured differences with the differences perceived by listeners. In the literature, the best correlations with perception were obtained for measures involving an auditory model. The present study investigated simpler measurements to highlight the signal processing steps required to make the link with perception. It is based on dissimilarity evaluations from two previous studies: 1 study comparing 12 single loudspeakers using 3 musical excerpts, 1 study comparing 21 headphones using 2 musical excerpts, and both studies highlighting 2 perceptual dimensions associated with the relative strengths of bass and midrange. The objective approach compared several signal analyses computing the dissimilarity between the spectra of the recorded sound reproductions. The results show that a third-octave analysis can accurately describe the overall dissimilarity between the loudspeakers or headphones and the two underlying perceptual dimensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Third-octave analyses describing two perceptual dimensions of sound reproduction and the resulting overall perceived dissimilarity between loudspeakers or headphones.\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Szwarcberg, Mathieu Lavandier\",\"doi\":\"10.1121/10.0030463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many objective measurements have been proposed to evaluate sound reproduction, but it is often difficult to link measured differences with the differences perceived by listeners. In the literature, the best correlations with perception were obtained for measures involving an auditory model. The present study investigated simpler measurements to highlight the signal processing steps required to make the link with perception. It is based on dissimilarity evaluations from two previous studies: 1 study comparing 12 single loudspeakers using 3 musical excerpts, 1 study comparing 21 headphones using 2 musical excerpts, and both studies highlighting 2 perceptual dimensions associated with the relative strengths of bass and midrange. The objective approach compared several signal analyses computing the dissimilarity between the spectra of the recorded sound reproductions. The results show that a third-octave analysis can accurately describe the overall dissimilarity between the loudspeakers or headphones and the two underlying perceptual dimensions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0030463\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0030463","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们提出了许多客观测量方法来评估声音再现,但通常很难将测量到的差异与听众感知到的差异联系起来。在文献中,涉及听觉模型的测量方法与感知的相关性最好。本研究调查了更简单的测量方法,以突出与感知建立联系所需的信号处理步骤。本研究以之前两项研究的差异评估为基础:其中一项研究使用 3 个音乐选段对 12 个单个扬声器进行了比较,另一项研究使用 2 个音乐选段对 21 个耳机进行了比较,这两项研究都强调了与低音和中音相对强度相关的 2 个感知维度。客观方法比较了几种信号分析,计算录制的声音再现的频谱之间的差异。结果表明,第三倍频程分析能准确描述扬声器或耳机与两个基本感知维度之间的整体差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Third-octave analyses describing two perceptual dimensions of sound reproduction and the resulting overall perceived dissimilarity between loudspeakers or headphones.

Many objective measurements have been proposed to evaluate sound reproduction, but it is often difficult to link measured differences with the differences perceived by listeners. In the literature, the best correlations with perception were obtained for measures involving an auditory model. The present study investigated simpler measurements to highlight the signal processing steps required to make the link with perception. It is based on dissimilarity evaluations from two previous studies: 1 study comparing 12 single loudspeakers using 3 musical excerpts, 1 study comparing 21 headphones using 2 musical excerpts, and both studies highlighting 2 perceptual dimensions associated with the relative strengths of bass and midrange. The objective approach compared several signal analyses computing the dissimilarity between the spectra of the recorded sound reproductions. The results show that a third-octave analysis can accurately describe the overall dissimilarity between the loudspeakers or headphones and the two underlying perceptual dimensions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1433
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.
期刊最新文献
Influence of variable sound-absorbing devices on room acoustical parameters of reverberation and intelligibility in medium-to-large multipurpose halls. Integer multi-wavelength gradient phase metagrating for perfect refraction: Phase choice freedom in supercella). Measurement of ocean currents by seafloor distributed optical-fiber acoustic sensing. Neville Fletcher's vibrant valve voyage. Office soundscape assessment: A model of acoustic environment perception in open-plan officesa).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1