淋巴水肿方面的进展。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1007/s12032-024-02509-z
Robert A Smith
{"title":"淋巴水肿方面的进展。","authors":"Robert A Smith","doi":"10.1007/s12032-024-02509-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A century ago, the first description of secondary lymphedema resulting from mastectomy was published in the medical literature. For most of the remaining twentieth century, evidence about cancer treatment related lymphedema grew slowly, and mostly through clinicians who wished to understand its causes, natural-history, and post-treatment risks, as well as from clinicians involved with its treatment. In the late 1990s, there was growing recognition that there were large gaps in our understanding of predisposing and post-treatment risks of onset, the near and long-term prevalence of lymphedema, and how to educate patients. Moreover, there was no consensus on best practices for treating lymphedema, and how to ensure the quality of treatment. In 1998, with support from the Longaberger Company®, the American Cancer Society began a long-standing commitment to address enduring challenges associated with lymphedema. This commitment began with a landmark international workshop on lymphedema that was held in New York City in February 1998, millions of dollars in research funding, support to establish the Lymphology Association of North America (LANA), a second workshop convened in February 2011 on the prospective surveillance model for rehabilitation for women with breast cancer, and most recently, the 2023 Lymphedema Summit: Forward momentum; Future Steps in Lymphedema Management, co-sponsored with the LANA, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, and the Stryker Corporation. This editorial introduces the papers and expert consensus statements from that Summit.</p>","PeriodicalId":18433,"journal":{"name":"Medical Oncology","volume":"41 11","pages":"261"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Progress in lymphedema.\",\"authors\":\"Robert A Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12032-024-02509-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A century ago, the first description of secondary lymphedema resulting from mastectomy was published in the medical literature. For most of the remaining twentieth century, evidence about cancer treatment related lymphedema grew slowly, and mostly through clinicians who wished to understand its causes, natural-history, and post-treatment risks, as well as from clinicians involved with its treatment. In the late 1990s, there was growing recognition that there were large gaps in our understanding of predisposing and post-treatment risks of onset, the near and long-term prevalence of lymphedema, and how to educate patients. Moreover, there was no consensus on best practices for treating lymphedema, and how to ensure the quality of treatment. In 1998, with support from the Longaberger Company®, the American Cancer Society began a long-standing commitment to address enduring challenges associated with lymphedema. This commitment began with a landmark international workshop on lymphedema that was held in New York City in February 1998, millions of dollars in research funding, support to establish the Lymphology Association of North America (LANA), a second workshop convened in February 2011 on the prospective surveillance model for rehabilitation for women with breast cancer, and most recently, the 2023 Lymphedema Summit: Forward momentum; Future Steps in Lymphedema Management, co-sponsored with the LANA, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, and the Stryker Corporation. This editorial introduces the papers and expert consensus statements from that Summit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"41 11\",\"pages\":\"261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-024-02509-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-024-02509-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个世纪前,医学文献中首次发表了关于乳房切除术后继发性淋巴水肿的描述。在二十世纪余下的大部分时间里,与癌症治疗相关的淋巴水肿证据增长缓慢,主要是通过希望了解其病因、自然史和治疗后风险的临床医生以及参与治疗的临床医生获得的。20 世纪 90 年代末,越来越多的人认识到,我们对淋巴水肿的发病诱因和治疗后风险、淋巴水肿的近期和远期发病率以及如何教育患者的认识还存在很大差距。此外,对于治疗淋巴水肿的最佳方法以及如何确保治疗质量也没有达成共识。1998 年,在 Longaberger Company® 的支持下,美国癌症协会开始致力于解决与淋巴水肿相关的长期难题。这一承诺始于 1998 年 2 月在纽约召开的具有里程碑意义的淋巴水肿国际研讨会、数百万美元的研究资金、对北美淋巴协会 (LANA) 成立的支持、2011 年 2 月召开的关于乳腺癌女性康复前瞻性监测模式的第二次研讨会,以及最近召开的 2023 年淋巴水肿峰会:圣路易斯华盛顿大学医学院(Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis)和史赛克公司(Stryker Corporation)共同主办的 "2023 年淋巴水肿峰会:前进的动力;淋巴水肿管理的未来步骤"。这篇社论介绍了此次峰会的论文和专家共识声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Progress in lymphedema.

A century ago, the first description of secondary lymphedema resulting from mastectomy was published in the medical literature. For most of the remaining twentieth century, evidence about cancer treatment related lymphedema grew slowly, and mostly through clinicians who wished to understand its causes, natural-history, and post-treatment risks, as well as from clinicians involved with its treatment. In the late 1990s, there was growing recognition that there were large gaps in our understanding of predisposing and post-treatment risks of onset, the near and long-term prevalence of lymphedema, and how to educate patients. Moreover, there was no consensus on best practices for treating lymphedema, and how to ensure the quality of treatment. In 1998, with support from the Longaberger Company®, the American Cancer Society began a long-standing commitment to address enduring challenges associated with lymphedema. This commitment began with a landmark international workshop on lymphedema that was held in New York City in February 1998, millions of dollars in research funding, support to establish the Lymphology Association of North America (LANA), a second workshop convened in February 2011 on the prospective surveillance model for rehabilitation for women with breast cancer, and most recently, the 2023 Lymphedema Summit: Forward momentum; Future Steps in Lymphedema Management, co-sponsored with the LANA, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, and the Stryker Corporation. This editorial introduces the papers and expert consensus statements from that Summit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Oncology
Medical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
259
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Medical Oncology (MO) communicates the results of clinical and experimental research in oncology and hematology, particularly experimental therapeutics within the fields of immunotherapy and chemotherapy. It also provides state-of-the-art reviews on clinical and experimental therapies. Topics covered include immunobiology, pathogenesis, and treatment of malignant tumors.
期刊最新文献
Dual roles of extracellular vesicles in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: implications for disease progression and theranostic strategies. Letter to the editor: the potential value of NDUFA4L2 in colon adenocarcinoma remains to be fully evaluated. Targeting the mevalonate pathway enhances the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil by regulating pyroptosis. Red wavelength-induced photobiomodulation enhances indocyanine green-based anticancer photodynamic therapy. Thapsigargin and its prodrug derivatives: exploring novel approaches for targeted cancer therapy through calcium signaling disruption.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1