基于 FDA 不良事件报告系统的雷利珠单抗比例分析。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Pub Date : 2024-10-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20420986241284112
Huqun Li, Cuilian Guo, Chongshu Wang
{"title":"基于 FDA 不良事件报告系统的雷利珠单抗比例分析。","authors":"Huqun Li, Cuilian Guo, Chongshu Wang","doi":"10.1177/20420986241284112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the increasing prescription of reslizumab for severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype, a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of reslizumab is urgently required to detect potential unreported adverse events (AEs) in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of reslizumab-related AEs in the real world.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Disproportionality analysis based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Reslizumab-related AEs between the second quarter of 2016 and the fourth quarter of 2022 from the FAERS database were obtained. A disproportionality analysis was performed to evaluate the safety profile of reslizumab using the reporting odds ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10,450,353 reports were collected from the FAERS database. Of the 403 reslizumab-related AEs, 42 distinct AEs were identified with positive signals. The most common AEs including dyspnea and oropharyngeal pain were identified, consistent with the instruction and clinical studies. Unexpected AEs of disproportionality such as bronchospasm and chest pain were also observed. Drug ineffective was identified as a noteworthy concern that accounted for 13.90% (56/403) of the overall reslizumab-related reports.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While reslizumab offered a promising treatment option for severe eosinophilic asthma, more attention should be paid to the common AEs and new unexpected AEs. Based on the current findings of signal detection, further prospective studies are needed for the next signal validation and confirmation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disproportionality analysis of reslizumab based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.\",\"authors\":\"Huqun Li, Cuilian Guo, Chongshu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20420986241284112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the increasing prescription of reslizumab for severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype, a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of reslizumab is urgently required to detect potential unreported adverse events (AEs) in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of reslizumab-related AEs in the real world.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Disproportionality analysis based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Reslizumab-related AEs between the second quarter of 2016 and the fourth quarter of 2022 from the FAERS database were obtained. A disproportionality analysis was performed to evaluate the safety profile of reslizumab using the reporting odds ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10,450,353 reports were collected from the FAERS database. Of the 403 reslizumab-related AEs, 42 distinct AEs were identified with positive signals. The most common AEs including dyspnea and oropharyngeal pain were identified, consistent with the instruction and clinical studies. Unexpected AEs of disproportionality such as bronchospasm and chest pain were also observed. Drug ineffective was identified as a noteworthy concern that accounted for 13.90% (56/403) of the overall reslizumab-related reports.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While reslizumab offered a promising treatment option for severe eosinophilic asthma, more attention should be paid to the common AEs and new unexpected AEs. Based on the current findings of signal detection, further prospective studies are needed for the next signal validation and confirmation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459504/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986241284112\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986241284112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着用于治疗严重嗜酸性粒细胞表型哮喘的雷利珠单抗处方不断增加,迫切需要对雷利珠单抗进行真实世界药物警戒分析,以发现临床实践中潜在的未报告不良事件(AEs):我们旨在全面评估现实世界中与雷利珠单抗相关的不良事件:设计:基于FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的比例失调分析:从FAERS数据库中获取2016年第二季度至2022年第四季度期间与瑞利珠单抗相关的AE。方法:从FAERS数据库中获取2016年第二季度至2022年第四季度期间雷利珠单抗相关的AE,利用报告几率比进行比例失调分析,评估雷利珠单抗的安全性:结果:FAERS数据库共收集了10,450,353份报告。在403例利珠单抗相关的AE中,发现了42例不同的阳性AE。最常见的不良反应包括呼吸困难和口咽疼痛,这与说明书和临床研究一致。此外,还观察到支气管痉挛和胸痛等意外的不相称性 AE。药物无效是一个值得关注的问题,占所有雷利珠单抗相关报告的13.90%(56/403):结论:尽管雷利珠单抗为重症嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘提供了一种很有前景的治疗方案,但应更加关注常见的AEs和新的意外AEs。结论:虽然雷珠单抗为严重嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘提供了一种很有前景的治疗方案,但应更加关注常见的AEs和新的意外AEs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disproportionality analysis of reslizumab based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

Background: With the increasing prescription of reslizumab for severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype, a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of reslizumab is urgently required to detect potential unreported adverse events (AEs) in clinical practice.

Objectives: We aimed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of reslizumab-related AEs in the real world.

Design: Disproportionality analysis based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Methods: Reslizumab-related AEs between the second quarter of 2016 and the fourth quarter of 2022 from the FAERS database were obtained. A disproportionality analysis was performed to evaluate the safety profile of reslizumab using the reporting odds ratio.

Results: A total of 10,450,353 reports were collected from the FAERS database. Of the 403 reslizumab-related AEs, 42 distinct AEs were identified with positive signals. The most common AEs including dyspnea and oropharyngeal pain were identified, consistent with the instruction and clinical studies. Unexpected AEs of disproportionality such as bronchospasm and chest pain were also observed. Drug ineffective was identified as a noteworthy concern that accounted for 13.90% (56/403) of the overall reslizumab-related reports.

Conclusion: While reslizumab offered a promising treatment option for severe eosinophilic asthma, more attention should be paid to the common AEs and new unexpected AEs. Based on the current findings of signal detection, further prospective studies are needed for the next signal validation and confirmation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies pertaining to the safe use of drugs in patients. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in drug safety, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest on research across all areas of drug safety, including therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacoepidemiology, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, pharmacovigilance, medication/prescribing errors, risk management, ethics and regulation.
期刊最新文献
Determining the optimum dose of remifentanil in combination with propofol for total intravenous anaesthesia in hysteroscopy under Narcotrend and SPI monitoring. The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance department in the pharmaceutical industry: results of an Italian national survey. Comparison of a single intravenous infusion of alfentanil or sufentanil combined with target-controlled infusion of propofol for daytime hysteroscopy: a randomized clinical trial. Governance of artificial intelligence and machine learning in pharmacovigilance: what works today and what more is needed? Patient-centric decision-making in supplements intake and disclosure in clinical practice: a novel SIDP-12 tool to prevent drug-supplement interaction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1