B. Kataria , M. Woisetschläger , J. Nilsson Althén , M. Sandborg , Ö. Smedby
{"title":"腹部 CT 图像质量评估:剂量、迭代重建强度和切片厚度的相对重要性。","authors":"B. Kataria , M. Woisetschläger , J. Nilsson Althén , M. Sandborg , Ö. Smedby","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.09.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Low contrast resolution in abdominal computed tomography (CT) may be negatively affected by attempts to lower patient doses. Iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms play a key role in mitigating this problem. The reconstructed slice thickness also influences image quality. The aim was to assess the interaction and influence of patient dose, slice thickness, and IR strength on image quality in abdominal CT.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>With a simultaneous acquisition, images at 42 and 98 mAs were obtained in 25 patients. Multiplanar images with slice thicknesses of 1, 2, and 3 mm and advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) strengths of 3 (AD3) and 5 (AD5) were reconstructed. Four radiologists evaluated the images in a pairwise manner based on five image criteria. Ordinal logistic regression with mixed effects was used to evaluate the effect of tube load, ADMIRE strength, and slice thickness using the visual grading regression technique.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For all assessed image criteria, the regression analysis showed significantly (<em>p <</em> 0.001) higher image quality for AD5, but lower for tube load 42 mAs, and slice thicknesses of 1 mm and 2 mm, compared to the reference categories of AD3, 98 mAs, and 3 mm, respectively. AD5 at 2 mm was superior to AD3 at 3 mm for all image criteria studied. AD5 1 mm produced inferior image quality for liver parenchyma and overall image quality compared to AD3 3 mm. Interobserver agreement (ICC) ranged from 0.874 to 0.920.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ADMIRE 5 at 2 mm slice thickness may allow for further dose reductions due to its superiority when compared to ADMIRE 3 at 3 mm slice thickness.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Combination of thinner slices and higher ADMIRE strength facilitates imaging at low dose.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"30 6","pages":"Pages 1563-1571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Image quality assessments in abdominal CT: Relative importance of dose, iterative reconstruction strength and slice thickness\",\"authors\":\"B. Kataria , M. Woisetschläger , J. Nilsson Althén , M. Sandborg , Ö. Smedby\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radi.2024.09.060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Low contrast resolution in abdominal computed tomography (CT) may be negatively affected by attempts to lower patient doses. Iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms play a key role in mitigating this problem. The reconstructed slice thickness also influences image quality. The aim was to assess the interaction and influence of patient dose, slice thickness, and IR strength on image quality in abdominal CT.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>With a simultaneous acquisition, images at 42 and 98 mAs were obtained in 25 patients. Multiplanar images with slice thicknesses of 1, 2, and 3 mm and advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) strengths of 3 (AD3) and 5 (AD5) were reconstructed. Four radiologists evaluated the images in a pairwise manner based on five image criteria. Ordinal logistic regression with mixed effects was used to evaluate the effect of tube load, ADMIRE strength, and slice thickness using the visual grading regression technique.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For all assessed image criteria, the regression analysis showed significantly (<em>p <</em> 0.001) higher image quality for AD5, but lower for tube load 42 mAs, and slice thicknesses of 1 mm and 2 mm, compared to the reference categories of AD3, 98 mAs, and 3 mm, respectively. AD5 at 2 mm was superior to AD3 at 3 mm for all image criteria studied. AD5 1 mm produced inferior image quality for liver parenchyma and overall image quality compared to AD3 3 mm. Interobserver agreement (ICC) ranged from 0.874 to 0.920.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ADMIRE 5 at 2 mm slice thickness may allow for further dose reductions due to its superiority when compared to ADMIRE 3 at 3 mm slice thickness.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Combination of thinner slices and higher ADMIRE strength facilitates imaging at low dose.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiography\",\"volume\":\"30 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1563-1571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742400289X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742400289X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Image quality assessments in abdominal CT: Relative importance of dose, iterative reconstruction strength and slice thickness
Introduction
Low contrast resolution in abdominal computed tomography (CT) may be negatively affected by attempts to lower patient doses. Iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms play a key role in mitigating this problem. The reconstructed slice thickness also influences image quality. The aim was to assess the interaction and influence of patient dose, slice thickness, and IR strength on image quality in abdominal CT.
Method
With a simultaneous acquisition, images at 42 and 98 mAs were obtained in 25 patients. Multiplanar images with slice thicknesses of 1, 2, and 3 mm and advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) strengths of 3 (AD3) and 5 (AD5) were reconstructed. Four radiologists evaluated the images in a pairwise manner based on five image criteria. Ordinal logistic regression with mixed effects was used to evaluate the effect of tube load, ADMIRE strength, and slice thickness using the visual grading regression technique.
Results
For all assessed image criteria, the regression analysis showed significantly (p < 0.001) higher image quality for AD5, but lower for tube load 42 mAs, and slice thicknesses of 1 mm and 2 mm, compared to the reference categories of AD3, 98 mAs, and 3 mm, respectively. AD5 at 2 mm was superior to AD3 at 3 mm for all image criteria studied. AD5 1 mm produced inferior image quality for liver parenchyma and overall image quality compared to AD3 3 mm. Interobserver agreement (ICC) ranged from 0.874 to 0.920.
Conclusion
ADMIRE 5 at 2 mm slice thickness may allow for further dose reductions due to its superiority when compared to ADMIRE 3 at 3 mm slice thickness.
Implications for practice
Combination of thinner slices and higher ADMIRE strength facilitates imaging at low dose.
RadiographyRADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍:
Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.