短讯:大不列颠赤狐(Vulpes vulpes)所感染的弓形虫蜱中的噬细胞嗜血杆菌(Anaplasma phagocytophilum)和巴贝西亚原虫(Babesia spp.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2024.102401
Karen L Mansfield , Estela González , Stuart McKay , Ternenge Apaa , Alexander J Kent , Paul Cropper , Naomi Berry , Luis M Hernández-Triana , Nicholas Johnson
{"title":"短讯:大不列颠赤狐(Vulpes vulpes)所感染的弓形虫蜱中的噬细胞嗜血杆菌(Anaplasma phagocytophilum)和巴贝西亚原虫(Babesia spp.","authors":"Karen L Mansfield ,&nbsp;Estela González ,&nbsp;Stuart McKay ,&nbsp;Ternenge Apaa ,&nbsp;Alexander J Kent ,&nbsp;Paul Cropper ,&nbsp;Naomi Berry ,&nbsp;Luis M Hernández-Triana ,&nbsp;Nicholas Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2024.102401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Red foxes (<em>Vulpes vulpes</em>) are found throughout the United Kingdom (UK), and can reach high population densities in urban areas. They are often infested with ticks which may carry tick-borne pathogens, leading to a risk of transmission to domestic animals and humans. This study investigated the prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in ticks sourced from red fox carcasses across Great Britain between 2018 and 2022. Tick species were identified using morphological keys and molecular barcoding, followed by specific pathogen testing using PCR. In total, 227 ticks were collected from 93 foxes. Pooling (<em>n</em> = 2) was undertaken for unengorged nymphs from the same tick species and fox host, with 203 homogenates tested in total (24 pools and 179 individual ticks). <em>Ixodes hexagonus</em> was the most abundant tick species sampled (73 %), of which 59 % were nymphs and 41 % were females. Less common were <em>Ixodes ricinus</em> (12 %) and <em>Ixodes canisuga</em> (15 %), the majority of which were females (73 % and 91 %, respectively). One <em>Ixodes</em> sp. larva was identified. <em>Babesia</em> DNA was identified in seven individual ticks and once in pooled ticks (<em>n</em> = 2); seven detections were in <em>I. hexagonus</em> and one in <em>I. canisuga</em>, with an overall detection rate of 7 % (95 % CI: 6 − 8 %). Sequence analysis confirmed that all <em>Babesia</em> detections in <em>I. hexagonus</em> were <em>Babesia vulpes</em>, with detection of <em>Babesia</em> Badger Type A in <em>I. canisuga</em>. Screening for <em>Anaplasma phagocytophilum</em> DNA through amplification of the <em>msp2</em> gene yielded an overall detection rate of 4 % (detected in <em>I. hexagonus</em> only). Louping ill virus was not detected by qRT-PCR in any tick RNA tested. The majority of pathogen detections were in ticks from red foxes in rural areas of the UK, although a small number of <em>Babesia</em> detections were in ticks collected from semi-rural or urban red foxes. Additionally, <em>B. vulpes</em> was detected in GB red fox tissues, suggesting a potential role as a reservoir host. This study confirms the detection of tick-borne pathogens in ticks infesting UK red foxes and highlights the involvement of GB tick species in animal or human disease transmission.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49320,"journal":{"name":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","volume":"15 6","pages":"Article 102401"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short Communication: Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia spp. in ixodid ticks infesting red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Great Britain\",\"authors\":\"Karen L Mansfield ,&nbsp;Estela González ,&nbsp;Stuart McKay ,&nbsp;Ternenge Apaa ,&nbsp;Alexander J Kent ,&nbsp;Paul Cropper ,&nbsp;Naomi Berry ,&nbsp;Luis M Hernández-Triana ,&nbsp;Nicholas Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2024.102401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Red foxes (<em>Vulpes vulpes</em>) are found throughout the United Kingdom (UK), and can reach high population densities in urban areas. They are often infested with ticks which may carry tick-borne pathogens, leading to a risk of transmission to domestic animals and humans. This study investigated the prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in ticks sourced from red fox carcasses across Great Britain between 2018 and 2022. Tick species were identified using morphological keys and molecular barcoding, followed by specific pathogen testing using PCR. In total, 227 ticks were collected from 93 foxes. Pooling (<em>n</em> = 2) was undertaken for unengorged nymphs from the same tick species and fox host, with 203 homogenates tested in total (24 pools and 179 individual ticks). <em>Ixodes hexagonus</em> was the most abundant tick species sampled (73 %), of which 59 % were nymphs and 41 % were females. Less common were <em>Ixodes ricinus</em> (12 %) and <em>Ixodes canisuga</em> (15 %), the majority of which were females (73 % and 91 %, respectively). One <em>Ixodes</em> sp. larva was identified. <em>Babesia</em> DNA was identified in seven individual ticks and once in pooled ticks (<em>n</em> = 2); seven detections were in <em>I. hexagonus</em> and one in <em>I. canisuga</em>, with an overall detection rate of 7 % (95 % CI: 6 − 8 %). Sequence analysis confirmed that all <em>Babesia</em> detections in <em>I. hexagonus</em> were <em>Babesia vulpes</em>, with detection of <em>Babesia</em> Badger Type A in <em>I. canisuga</em>. Screening for <em>Anaplasma phagocytophilum</em> DNA through amplification of the <em>msp2</em> gene yielded an overall detection rate of 4 % (detected in <em>I. hexagonus</em> only). Louping ill virus was not detected by qRT-PCR in any tick RNA tested. The majority of pathogen detections were in ticks from red foxes in rural areas of the UK, although a small number of <em>Babesia</em> detections were in ticks collected from semi-rural or urban red foxes. Additionally, <em>B. vulpes</em> was detected in GB red fox tissues, suggesting a potential role as a reservoir host. This study confirms the detection of tick-borne pathogens in ticks infesting UK red foxes and highlights the involvement of GB tick species in animal or human disease transmission.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 102401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X24000943\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X24000943","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

红狐(Vulpes vulpes)遍布英国各地,在城市地区的种群密度很高。红狐身上经常有蜱虫,这些蜱虫可能携带蜱媒病原体,有可能传播给家畜和人类。本研究调查了 2018 年至 2022 年期间英国各地红狐尸体上的蜱虫中蜱传病原体的流行情况。研究人员使用形态学密钥和分子条形码鉴定了蜱虫种类,然后使用 PCR 进行了特定病原体检测。总共从 93 只狐狸身上采集到 227 只蜱虫。对来自同一蜱虫物种和狐狸宿主的未脱钩若虫进行了汇集(n = 2),共检测了 203 个匀浆(24 个汇集和 179 个单个蜱虫)。六角伊蚊是取样最多的蜱虫种类(73%),其中 59% 为若虫,41% 为雌性。较少见的是蓖麻蜱(12%)和犬蜱(15%),其中大多数为雌性(分别为 73% 和 91%)。发现了一只 Ixodes sp.幼虫。在 7 只个体蜱虫和 1 只集合蜱虫(n = 2)中发现了巴贝斯虫 DNA;其中 7 只在六角伊蚊中发现,1 只在犬科伊蚊中发现,总检出率为 7 %(95 % CI:6 - 8 %)。序列分析证实,在六角蛙中检测到的所有巴贝西亚原虫都是秃头巴贝西亚原虫,在犬蛙中检测到的是獾型巴贝西亚原虫 A 型。通过扩增 msp2 基因筛查噬细胞蝇疟原虫 DNA,总检出率为 4%(仅在六角蛙中检出)。通过 qRT-PCR 技术,在所有检测的蜱 RNA 中都没有检测到娄平病病毒。大多数病原体都是从英国农村地区的红狐身上检测到的,但也有少量巴贝西亚原虫是从半农村或城市红狐身上采集的蜱虫中检测到的。此外,在 GB 红狐的组织中也检测到了巴贝西亚原虫,这表明红狐有可能是巴贝西亚原虫的宿主。这项研究证实了在侵扰英国红狐的蜱虫中检测到了蜱传病原体,并强调了英国蜱虫物种参与动物或人类疾病传播的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Short Communication: Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia spp. in ixodid ticks infesting red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Great Britain
Red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) are found throughout the United Kingdom (UK), and can reach high population densities in urban areas. They are often infested with ticks which may carry tick-borne pathogens, leading to a risk of transmission to domestic animals and humans. This study investigated the prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in ticks sourced from red fox carcasses across Great Britain between 2018 and 2022. Tick species were identified using morphological keys and molecular barcoding, followed by specific pathogen testing using PCR. In total, 227 ticks were collected from 93 foxes. Pooling (n = 2) was undertaken for unengorged nymphs from the same tick species and fox host, with 203 homogenates tested in total (24 pools and 179 individual ticks). Ixodes hexagonus was the most abundant tick species sampled (73 %), of which 59 % were nymphs and 41 % were females. Less common were Ixodes ricinus (12 %) and Ixodes canisuga (15 %), the majority of which were females (73 % and 91 %, respectively). One Ixodes sp. larva was identified. Babesia DNA was identified in seven individual ticks and once in pooled ticks (n = 2); seven detections were in I. hexagonus and one in I. canisuga, with an overall detection rate of 7 % (95 % CI: 6 − 8 %). Sequence analysis confirmed that all Babesia detections in I. hexagonus were Babesia vulpes, with detection of Babesia Badger Type A in I. canisuga. Screening for Anaplasma phagocytophilum DNA through amplification of the msp2 gene yielded an overall detection rate of 4 % (detected in I. hexagonus only). Louping ill virus was not detected by qRT-PCR in any tick RNA tested. The majority of pathogen detections were in ticks from red foxes in rural areas of the UK, although a small number of Babesia detections were in ticks collected from semi-rural or urban red foxes. Additionally, B. vulpes was detected in GB red fox tissues, suggesting a potential role as a reservoir host. This study confirms the detection of tick-borne pathogens in ticks infesting UK red foxes and highlights the involvement of GB tick species in animal or human disease transmission.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases INFECTIOUS DISEASES-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original research papers, short communications, state-of-the-art mini-reviews, letters to the editor, clinical-case studies, announcements of pertinent international meetings, and editorials. The journal covers a broad spectrum and brings together various disciplines, for example, zoology, microbiology, molecular biology, genetics, mathematical modelling, veterinary and human medicine. Multidisciplinary approaches and the use of conventional and novel methods/methodologies (in the field and in the laboratory) are crucial for deeper understanding of the natural processes and human behaviour/activities that result in human or animal diseases and in economic effects of ticks and tick-borne pathogens. Such understanding is essential for management of tick populations and tick-borne diseases in an effective and environmentally acceptable manner.
期刊最新文献
Genome sequence of Ehrlichia muris from Ixodes ricinus collected in Italy on a migratory bird provides epidemiological and evolutionary insights Clinical manifestations and outcomes of Tick-borne encephalitis: A systematic literature review Natural Panola Mountain Ehrlichia infections in cattle in a longitudinal study of Angus beef calves Microbial genetic variation impacts host eco-immunological strategies and microparasite fitness in Lyme borreliae-reptile system Detection of Anaplasma bovis-like agent in the Southcentral United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1