Impact of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score on Outcomes following Primary Total Elbow Arthroplasty.

Background: The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) has demonstrated strong correlation with adverse outcomes in various joint replacement surgeries, yet its applicability in total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) remains unexplored. The purpose of this study is to assess the association between HFRS and postoperative complications following elective primary TEA.

Methods: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried to identify patients undergoing primary TEA from 2016 to 2020. The HFRS was used to compare medical, surgical, and clinical outcomes of frail vs. non-frail patients. Mean and relative costs, total hospital length of stay (LOS), and discharge disposition for frail and non-frail patients were also compared.

Results: We identified 2,049 primary TEA in frail patients and 3,693 in non-frail patients. Frail patients had increased complication rates including acute respiratory failure (13.6% vs. 1.1%; p < 0.001), urinary tract infections (12.3% vs. 0.0%; p < 0.001), transfusions (3.9% vs. 1.1%; p < 0.001), pneumonia (1.1% vs. 0.2%; p < 0.001), acute respiratory distress syndrome (3.2% vs 0.6%; p < 0.001), sepsis (0.7% vs. 0.1%; p < 0.001), and hardware failure (1.2% vs 0.1%; p < 0.001). Frail patients also experienced higher rates of readmission (37% vs. 25%; p < 0.001) and death (1.7% vs. 0.2%; p < 0.001), while being less likely to undergo revision (6.5% vs. 17%; p < 0.001). Frail patients incurred higher healthcare costs ($28,497 vs. $23,377; p < 0.001) and longer LOS (5.3 days vs. 2.6 days; p < 0.001), with reduced likelihood of routine hospital stays (36% vs. 71%; p < 0.001) and increased utilization of short-term hospitalization (p < 0.001), care facilities (p < 0.001), and home health care services (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: HFRS is a validated indicator of frailty and is strongly associated with increased rates of complications in patients undergoing elective primary TEA. These findings should be considered by orthopedic surgeons when assessing surgical candidacy and discussing treatment options in this at-risk patient population.