{"title":"评估槌状骨折的骨折线角度。","authors":"Erdem Ateş, Ender Gümüşoğlu, Anıl Arikan, Metin Manouchehr Eskandari","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Surgery is often offered to patients with mallet fractures that have a large, displaced fragment and/or joint subluxation. However, the surgical approach remains a subject of debate, and surgery is frequently associated with unsatisfactory outcomes. We felt that the angle formed by the fracture line and the long axis of the distal phalanx on a lateral view radiograph (fracture line angle [FLA]) could be useful in determining the appropriate treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to assess the FLA and its distribution in mallet fractures. <b>Methods:</b> Three researchers measured the mallet FLA and the percentage of articular surface (PAS) involved in the lateral radiographs of 103 patients with a mallet fracture. <b>Results:</b> There was a strong correlation between the mallet FLA and the percentage of joint surface involvement between the three researchers. The mean FLA was 42.59° (±11.54) and it ranged from -1 to +1 standard deviation in 73 individuals (70.87%). The FLA varied over a wide range, while clustering near the average value. The average PAS involvement was 46.5% (±8.7%). There was no correlation between FLA and PAS involvement (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> It is possible to quantify the mallet FLA accurately and consistently. It varies widely, regardless of the PAS involvement. When choosing the type of treatment and making prognostic predictions, the mallet FLA may be a helpful guide. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Diagnostic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Fracture Line Angle in Mallet Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Erdem Ateş, Ender Gümüşoğlu, Anıl Arikan, Metin Manouchehr Eskandari\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S2424835525500018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Surgery is often offered to patients with mallet fractures that have a large, displaced fragment and/or joint subluxation. However, the surgical approach remains a subject of debate, and surgery is frequently associated with unsatisfactory outcomes. We felt that the angle formed by the fracture line and the long axis of the distal phalanx on a lateral view radiograph (fracture line angle [FLA]) could be useful in determining the appropriate treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to assess the FLA and its distribution in mallet fractures. <b>Methods:</b> Three researchers measured the mallet FLA and the percentage of articular surface (PAS) involved in the lateral radiographs of 103 patients with a mallet fracture. <b>Results:</b> There was a strong correlation between the mallet FLA and the percentage of joint surface involvement between the three researchers. The mean FLA was 42.59° (±11.54) and it ranged from -1 to +1 standard deviation in 73 individuals (70.87%). The FLA varied over a wide range, while clustering near the average value. The average PAS involvement was 46.5% (±8.7%). There was no correlation between FLA and PAS involvement (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> It is possible to quantify the mallet FLA accurately and consistently. It varies widely, regardless of the PAS involvement. When choosing the type of treatment and making prognostic predictions, the mallet FLA may be a helpful guide. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Diagnostic).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:槌状骨折患者如果有大块移位碎片和/或关节半脱位,通常需要进行手术治疗。然而,手术方法仍是一个争论不休的话题,而且手术效果往往不尽如人意。我们认为,侧位X光片上骨折线与远端指骨长轴形成的角度(骨折线角度[FLA])有助于确定适当的治疗策略。本研究旨在评估槌状骨折的 FLA 及其分布情况。方法:三位研究人员测量了 103 名槌状骨折患者侧位片上的槌状骨折线角(FLA)和受累关节面(PAS)的百分比。结果:103 名槌状骨折患者的槌状 FLA 与关节面(PAS)之间存在很强的相关性:三位研究人员的槌状FLA和关节面受累百分比之间存在很强的相关性。73名患者(70.87%)的平均FLA为42.59°(±11.54),标准偏差在-1到+1之间。FLA的变化范围很大,但都集中在平均值附近。PAS 平均参与度为 46.5%(±8.7%)。FLA 与 PAS 受累程度之间没有相关性(P > 0.05)。结论可以准确、一致地量化槌状 FLA。无论 PAS 是否受累,其差异都很大。在选择治疗类型和预测预后时,槌状 FLA 可能是一个有用的指南。证据等级:四级(诊断)。
Assessment of Fracture Line Angle in Mallet Fractures.
Background: Surgery is often offered to patients with mallet fractures that have a large, displaced fragment and/or joint subluxation. However, the surgical approach remains a subject of debate, and surgery is frequently associated with unsatisfactory outcomes. We felt that the angle formed by the fracture line and the long axis of the distal phalanx on a lateral view radiograph (fracture line angle [FLA]) could be useful in determining the appropriate treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to assess the FLA and its distribution in mallet fractures. Methods: Three researchers measured the mallet FLA and the percentage of articular surface (PAS) involved in the lateral radiographs of 103 patients with a mallet fracture. Results: There was a strong correlation between the mallet FLA and the percentage of joint surface involvement between the three researchers. The mean FLA was 42.59° (±11.54) and it ranged from -1 to +1 standard deviation in 73 individuals (70.87%). The FLA varied over a wide range, while clustering near the average value. The average PAS involvement was 46.5% (±8.7%). There was no correlation between FLA and PAS involvement (p > 0.05). Conclusions: It is possible to quantify the mallet FLA accurately and consistently. It varies widely, regardless of the PAS involvement. When choosing the type of treatment and making prognostic predictions, the mallet FLA may be a helpful guide. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Diagnostic).