Javier Marco-Ayala , Pedro Asensi Cantó , Marina Suarez , Brais Lamas , Marta Santiago , Inés Gómez , Mario Arnao , Jaime Sanz , Alberto Montava , Miguel Ángel Sanz , Javier de la Rubia , Pilar Solves
{"title":"自体造血干细胞移植中的单次输血政策:更少并非更糟。","authors":"Javier Marco-Ayala , Pedro Asensi Cantó , Marina Suarez , Brais Lamas , Marta Santiago , Inés Gómez , Mario Arnao , Jaime Sanz , Alberto Montava , Miguel Ángel Sanz , Javier de la Rubia , Pilar Solves","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2024.150859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Single-unit red blood cell (1-RBC) transfusion policy has shown to effectively reduce transfusion burden while maintaining comparable clinical outcomes in hematological patients compared to the classical double-unit policy. However, its effects specifically after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have not been previously studied. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the 1-RBC policy on transfusion burden in a homogeneous cohort of patients undergoing ASCT. We retrospectively compared the transfusion requirements and the clinical outcomes of 187 patients transplanted from May 2019 to December 2022 under a 1-RBC policy, with a historical cohort of 153 patients transplanted from January 2016 to April 2019 under a double-unit policy. The 1-RBC policy was associated with a 32% reduction in RBC utilization and lower number of RBC transfusions at day 30 after transplantation (median 2 versus 3 units; <em>P</em> < .0001), with an odds ratio of 0.49 in multivariate analysis (<em>P</em> = .03). However, the number of transfusion episodes remained similar (median of 2 in both arms; <em>P</em> = .34). No significant differences in length of stay, hemoglobin levels at discharge or 30‐day mortality were observed. In conclusion, transitioning to the 1-RBC represents a straightforward action in current practice that significantly reduces blood transfusions in patients undergoing ASCT, without negatively impacting clinical outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 150859"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-Unit Transfusion Policy in Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Less is Not Worse\",\"authors\":\"Javier Marco-Ayala , Pedro Asensi Cantó , Marina Suarez , Brais Lamas , Marta Santiago , Inés Gómez , Mario Arnao , Jaime Sanz , Alberto Montava , Miguel Ángel Sanz , Javier de la Rubia , Pilar Solves\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tmrv.2024.150859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Single-unit red blood cell (1-RBC) transfusion policy has shown to effectively reduce transfusion burden while maintaining comparable clinical outcomes in hematological patients compared to the classical double-unit policy. However, its effects specifically after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have not been previously studied. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the 1-RBC policy on transfusion burden in a homogeneous cohort of patients undergoing ASCT. We retrospectively compared the transfusion requirements and the clinical outcomes of 187 patients transplanted from May 2019 to December 2022 under a 1-RBC policy, with a historical cohort of 153 patients transplanted from January 2016 to April 2019 under a double-unit policy. The 1-RBC policy was associated with a 32% reduction in RBC utilization and lower number of RBC transfusions at day 30 after transplantation (median 2 versus 3 units; <em>P</em> < .0001), with an odds ratio of 0.49 in multivariate analysis (<em>P</em> = .03). However, the number of transfusion episodes remained similar (median of 2 in both arms; <em>P</em> = .34). No significant differences in length of stay, hemoglobin levels at discharge or 30‐day mortality were observed. In conclusion, transitioning to the 1-RBC represents a straightforward action in current practice that significantly reduces blood transfusions in patients undergoing ASCT, without negatively impacting clinical outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion Medicine Reviews\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 150859\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion Medicine Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088779632400049X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088779632400049X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Single-Unit Transfusion Policy in Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Less is Not Worse
Single-unit red blood cell (1-RBC) transfusion policy has shown to effectively reduce transfusion burden while maintaining comparable clinical outcomes in hematological patients compared to the classical double-unit policy. However, its effects specifically after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have not been previously studied. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the 1-RBC policy on transfusion burden in a homogeneous cohort of patients undergoing ASCT. We retrospectively compared the transfusion requirements and the clinical outcomes of 187 patients transplanted from May 2019 to December 2022 under a 1-RBC policy, with a historical cohort of 153 patients transplanted from January 2016 to April 2019 under a double-unit policy. The 1-RBC policy was associated with a 32% reduction in RBC utilization and lower number of RBC transfusions at day 30 after transplantation (median 2 versus 3 units; P < .0001), with an odds ratio of 0.49 in multivariate analysis (P = .03). However, the number of transfusion episodes remained similar (median of 2 in both arms; P = .34). No significant differences in length of stay, hemoglobin levels at discharge or 30‐day mortality were observed. In conclusion, transitioning to the 1-RBC represents a straightforward action in current practice that significantly reduces blood transfusions in patients undergoing ASCT, without negatively impacting clinical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Transfusion Medicine Reviews provides an international forum in English for the publication of scholarly work devoted to the various sub-disciplines that comprise Transfusion Medicine including hemostasis and thrombosis and cellular therapies. The scope of the journal encompasses basic science, practical aspects, laboratory developments, clinical indications, and adverse effects.