肝移植中上腔静脉直径和塌陷指数的评估:一项前瞻性观察研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844563
{"title":"肝移植中上腔静脉直径和塌陷指数的评估:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Superior Vena Cava (SVC) diameter and collapsibility index, dynamic measures of fluid responsiveness, have been successfully utilized as echocardiographic indices for fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Whether these measurements are correlated with Central Venous Pressure (CVP) measurements in liver transplant patients is unknown. We sought to assess the correlation of maximum and minimum SVC diameter and SVC collapsibility index measurements obtained intraoperatively by Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) with those of simultaneously recorded CVP measurements obtained through a right atrial port of a pulmonary artery catheter. The secondary aim of the study was to assess the correlation between SVC measurements and simultaneously obtained thermodilution cardiac index measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Single center prospective observational trial of patients with end stage liver disease undergoing liver transplantation in an academic tertiary care center.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The minimum SVC exhibited a mild significant correlation with CVP as did the maximum SVC. The correlation between the SVC collapsibility index and CVP was not significantly different from zero. In our secondary analysis, the correlation between minimum SVC diameter and cardiac index was determined to be weak but non-zero as was the correlation between the maximum SVC diameter and cardiac index. The correlation between SVC collapsibility index and cardiac index was not different from zero.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While statistically significant, the weak clinical correlation of intraoperative SVC measurements obtained by TEE make them unsuitable as a replacement for central venous pressure or thermodilution cardiac index measurements in liver transplant recipients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of superior vena cava diameter and collapsibility index in liver transplantation: a prospective observational study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Superior Vena Cava (SVC) diameter and collapsibility index, dynamic measures of fluid responsiveness, have been successfully utilized as echocardiographic indices for fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Whether these measurements are correlated with Central Venous Pressure (CVP) measurements in liver transplant patients is unknown. We sought to assess the correlation of maximum and minimum SVC diameter and SVC collapsibility index measurements obtained intraoperatively by Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) with those of simultaneously recorded CVP measurements obtained through a right atrial port of a pulmonary artery catheter. The secondary aim of the study was to assess the correlation between SVC measurements and simultaneously obtained thermodilution cardiac index measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Single center prospective observational trial of patients with end stage liver disease undergoing liver transplantation in an academic tertiary care center.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The minimum SVC exhibited a mild significant correlation with CVP as did the maximum SVC. The correlation between the SVC collapsibility index and CVP was not significantly different from zero. In our secondary analysis, the correlation between minimum SVC diameter and cardiac index was determined to be weak but non-zero as was the correlation between the maximum SVC diameter and cardiac index. The correlation between SVC collapsibility index and cardiac index was not different from zero.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While statistically significant, the weak clinical correlation of intraoperative SVC measurements obtained by TEE make them unsuitable as a replacement for central venous pressure or thermodilution cardiac index measurements in liver transplant recipients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S010400142400085X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S010400142400085X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:上腔静脉(SVC)直径和塌陷度指数是液体反应性的动态测量指标,已被成功用作脓毒症通气患者液体反应性的超声心动图指标。这些测量值与肝移植患者的中心静脉压(CVP)测量值是否相关尚不清楚。我们试图评估术中通过经食道超声心动图(TEE)获得的最大和最小SVC直径以及SVC塌陷度指数测量值与通过肺动脉导管右心房端口同时记录的CVP测量值之间的相关性。研究的第二个目的是评估 SVC 测量值与同时获得的热稀释心脏指数测量值之间的相关性:方法:在一家学术性三级医疗中心对接受肝移植的终末期肝病患者进行单中心前瞻性观察试验:结果:最小 SVC 与 CVP 呈轻度显著相关,最大 SVC 也是如此。SVC塌陷指数与CVP之间的相关性与零无显著差异。在我们的二次分析中,最小 SVC 直径与心脏指数之间的相关性较弱,但不为零,最大 SVC 直径与心脏指数之间的相关性也是如此。SVC塌陷指数与心脏指数之间的相关性与零无差异:通过 TEE 获得的术中 SVC 测量值虽然具有统计学意义,但其临床相关性较弱,因此不适合取代肝移植受者的中心静脉压或热稀释心脏指数测量值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of superior vena cava diameter and collapsibility index in liver transplantation: a prospective observational study

Background

Superior Vena Cava (SVC) diameter and collapsibility index, dynamic measures of fluid responsiveness, have been successfully utilized as echocardiographic indices for fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Whether these measurements are correlated with Central Venous Pressure (CVP) measurements in liver transplant patients is unknown. We sought to assess the correlation of maximum and minimum SVC diameter and SVC collapsibility index measurements obtained intraoperatively by Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) with those of simultaneously recorded CVP measurements obtained through a right atrial port of a pulmonary artery catheter. The secondary aim of the study was to assess the correlation between SVC measurements and simultaneously obtained thermodilution cardiac index measurements.

Methods

Single center prospective observational trial of patients with end stage liver disease undergoing liver transplantation in an academic tertiary care center.

Results

The minimum SVC exhibited a mild significant correlation with CVP as did the maximum SVC. The correlation between the SVC collapsibility index and CVP was not significantly different from zero. In our secondary analysis, the correlation between minimum SVC diameter and cardiac index was determined to be weak but non-zero as was the correlation between the maximum SVC diameter and cardiac index. The correlation between SVC collapsibility index and cardiac index was not different from zero.

Conclusion

While statistically significant, the weak clinical correlation of intraoperative SVC measurements obtained by TEE make them unsuitable as a replacement for central venous pressure or thermodilution cardiac index measurements in liver transplant recipients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
期刊最新文献
Assessment of superior vena cava diameter and collapsibility index in liver transplantation: a prospective observational study The debate on antifibrinolytics in liver transplantation: always, never, or sometimes? Comparison of propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl combinations for sedation in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized clinical trial Intraoperative hypotension and postoperative delirium in elderly male patients undergoing laryngectomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study The efficacy of buprenorphine compared with dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1