利用真空辅助乳房切除术和动力辅助吸脂术治疗混合型妇科肿瘤的有效微创策略。

Yu-Chi Wang , Shu-Hung Huang , Fang-Ming Chen , Ping-Fu Yang , Li-Chun Kao , Ya-Wei Lai
{"title":"利用真空辅助乳房切除术和动力辅助吸脂术治疗混合型妇科肿瘤的有效微创策略。","authors":"Yu-Chi Wang ,&nbsp;Shu-Hung Huang ,&nbsp;Fang-Ming Chen ,&nbsp;Ping-Fu Yang ,&nbsp;Li-Chun Kao ,&nbsp;Ya-Wei Lai","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Mixed-type gynecomastia is a benign male breast condition characterized by the proliferation of glandular and adipose tissues. Conventional open surgery has been the main approach for treating gynecomastia. However, this method has been associated with complications, including breast deformity, noticeable scar, nipple necrosis, and hypoesthesia. In contrast, vacuum-assisted biopsy systems and liposuction have demonstrated significant advantages in minimally invasive breast surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Our study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of combining vacuum-assisted mastectomy with power-assisted liposuction (VAM+PAL) for patients with mixed-type gynecomastia compared to conventional open surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty patients with mixed-type gynecomastia, treated between January 2019 and June 2023, were included in this study. VAM+PAL was performed on 30 patients (59 breasts), and open excision with periareolar approach was performed on 30 patients (59 breasts). The efficacy, complications, outcomes, scar cosmesis, and patient satisfaction were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared to open excision group for gynecomastia, the VAM+PAL group demonstrated a substantial reduction in incision size (4.47 ± 1.21 cm vs. 0.97 ± 0.74 cm, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and lower scores of Vancouver scar scale (3.23 ± 2.27 vs. 1.10 ± 1.47, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). No drainage tubes were required for postoperative hematoma/seroma prevention. The patients in the VAM+PAL group had significantly lower complication rates (18.64% vs. 3.39%, <em>p</em> = 0.008), particularly in bruise and hypoesthesia. All VAM+PAL patients reported superior satisfaction with the outcomes in breasts and nipples.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The combination of vacuum-assisted mastectomy and power-assisted liposuction can be used as an efficient minimally invasive method to treat mixed-type gynecomastia with acceptable complications, superior scar cosmesis, and satisfying outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"99 ","pages":"Pages 175-184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective minimally invasive strategy for mixed-type gynecomastia using vacuum-assisted mastectomy and power-assisted liposuction\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Chi Wang ,&nbsp;Shu-Hung Huang ,&nbsp;Fang-Ming Chen ,&nbsp;Ping-Fu Yang ,&nbsp;Li-Chun Kao ,&nbsp;Ya-Wei Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Mixed-type gynecomastia is a benign male breast condition characterized by the proliferation of glandular and adipose tissues. Conventional open surgery has been the main approach for treating gynecomastia. However, this method has been associated with complications, including breast deformity, noticeable scar, nipple necrosis, and hypoesthesia. In contrast, vacuum-assisted biopsy systems and liposuction have demonstrated significant advantages in minimally invasive breast surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Our study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of combining vacuum-assisted mastectomy with power-assisted liposuction (VAM+PAL) for patients with mixed-type gynecomastia compared to conventional open surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty patients with mixed-type gynecomastia, treated between January 2019 and June 2023, were included in this study. VAM+PAL was performed on 30 patients (59 breasts), and open excision with periareolar approach was performed on 30 patients (59 breasts). The efficacy, complications, outcomes, scar cosmesis, and patient satisfaction were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared to open excision group for gynecomastia, the VAM+PAL group demonstrated a substantial reduction in incision size (4.47 ± 1.21 cm vs. 0.97 ± 0.74 cm, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and lower scores of Vancouver scar scale (3.23 ± 2.27 vs. 1.10 ± 1.47, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). No drainage tubes were required for postoperative hematoma/seroma prevention. The patients in the VAM+PAL group had significantly lower complication rates (18.64% vs. 3.39%, <em>p</em> = 0.008), particularly in bruise and hypoesthesia. All VAM+PAL patients reported superior satisfaction with the outcomes in breasts and nipples.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The combination of vacuum-assisted mastectomy and power-assisted liposuction can be used as an efficient minimally invasive method to treat mixed-type gynecomastia with acceptable complications, superior scar cosmesis, and satisfying outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 175-184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524005941\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524005941","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:混合型妇科乳腺增生症是一种良性男性乳房疾病,其特点是腺体和脂肪组织增生。传统的开刀手术一直是治疗妇科乳腺增生症的主要方法。然而,这种方法也存在一些并发症,包括乳房畸形、明显疤痕、乳头坏死和感觉减退。相比之下,真空辅助活检系统和吸脂术在微创乳房手术中表现出了显著的优势。目的:我们的研究旨在探讨真空辅助乳房切除术与动力辅助吸脂术(VAM+PAL)相结合治疗混合型妇科乳腺增生症患者的效果,并与传统的开放手术进行比较:本研究纳入了60例混合型妇科乳腺增生患者,这些患者在2019年1月至2023年6月期间接受了治疗。对30名患者(59个乳房)实施了VAM+PAL手术,对30名患者(59个乳房)实施了乳晕周围开放切除术。对疗效、并发症、结果、疤痕美观度和患者满意度进行了评估:结果:与妇科乳腺增生开放切除术组相比,VAM+PAL 组的切口尺寸大大缩小(4.47 ± 1.21 厘米 vs. 0.97 ± 0.74 厘米,P 结论:VAM+PAL 组的切口尺寸比开放切除术组的切口尺寸要小得多:真空辅助乳房切除术和动力辅助吸脂术的结合可作为治疗混合型妇科乳腺增生症的有效微创方法,并发症可接受,疤痕美观,疗效令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effective minimally invasive strategy for mixed-type gynecomastia using vacuum-assisted mastectomy and power-assisted liposuction

Introduction

Mixed-type gynecomastia is a benign male breast condition characterized by the proliferation of glandular and adipose tissues. Conventional open surgery has been the main approach for treating gynecomastia. However, this method has been associated with complications, including breast deformity, noticeable scar, nipple necrosis, and hypoesthesia. In contrast, vacuum-assisted biopsy systems and liposuction have demonstrated significant advantages in minimally invasive breast surgery.

Aims

Our study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of combining vacuum-assisted mastectomy with power-assisted liposuction (VAM+PAL) for patients with mixed-type gynecomastia compared to conventional open surgery.

Methods

Sixty patients with mixed-type gynecomastia, treated between January 2019 and June 2023, were included in this study. VAM+PAL was performed on 30 patients (59 breasts), and open excision with periareolar approach was performed on 30 patients (59 breasts). The efficacy, complications, outcomes, scar cosmesis, and patient satisfaction were assessed.

Results

Compared to open excision group for gynecomastia, the VAM+PAL group demonstrated a substantial reduction in incision size (4.47 ± 1.21 cm vs. 0.97 ± 0.74 cm, p < 0.001) and lower scores of Vancouver scar scale (3.23 ± 2.27 vs. 1.10 ± 1.47, p < 0.001). No drainage tubes were required for postoperative hematoma/seroma prevention. The patients in the VAM+PAL group had significantly lower complication rates (18.64% vs. 3.39%, p = 0.008), particularly in bruise and hypoesthesia. All VAM+PAL patients reported superior satisfaction with the outcomes in breasts and nipples.

Conclusion

The combination of vacuum-assisted mastectomy and power-assisted liposuction can be used as an efficient minimally invasive method to treat mixed-type gynecomastia with acceptable complications, superior scar cosmesis, and satisfying outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
期刊最新文献
SCIV-only versus VCs-only conduit: Which is optimal for multipaddle and chimeric SCIAP flaps? Clinicopathologic features and surgical management in vulvovaginal melanoma – A retrospective single-center study Rib-sparing subclavian vein decompression in venous thoracic outlet syndrome Editorial Board The impact of cosmetic tourism across one year on an NHS breast surgery unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1