在德国医院的常规精神健康护理中实施电子患者门户网站--评估医疗服务提供者的态度。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11686-6
Isabelle Reinhardt, Rosa Holsten, Jürgen Zielasek, Laura Kuhlmann, Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-Mayfrank
{"title":"在德国医院的常规精神健康护理中实施电子患者门户网站--评估医疗服务提供者的态度。","authors":"Isabelle Reinhardt, Rosa Holsten, Jürgen Zielasek, Laura Kuhlmann, Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-Mayfrank","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11686-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of digital tools such as electronic patient portals in different health care disciplines and settings has been increasing, but the rate of implementation in clinical practice still lags behind expectations. While studies have linked the use of electronic patient portals to positive health outcomes for patients, studies addressing the viewpoints of healthcare providers are rare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an online survey of attitudes of healthcare providers towards an electronic patient portal for mental health hospitals. The portal was developed by five communal providers of mental health care in different regions in Germany. The survey was carried out during the early phase of implementation of the portal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty project leaders and 37 clinicians from five different mental health hospitals answered the questionnaire (response rate: 45% and 28%). Overall, acceptance of online applications among respondents was high. The healthcare providers mentioned perceived benefits (e.g. accessibility of new patient groups, use of therapy-free periods) as well as a number of technical, structural, organizational and staffing barriers for successful implementation in hospital settings (e.g. workload of healthcare providers and lack of staff, limited digital competences, unstable WLAN).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The perceived barriers and facilitators of the implementation of online applications and electronic patient portals in mental health hospitals identified by healthcare providers may be taken into account. Improving commitment of the healthcare providers to implementation and use of digital interventions may help foster digitalisation in mental health hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of an electronic patient portal in routine mental health care of hospitals in Germany - evaluation of attitudes of healthcare providers.\",\"authors\":\"Isabelle Reinhardt, Rosa Holsten, Jürgen Zielasek, Laura Kuhlmann, Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-Mayfrank\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-024-11686-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of digital tools such as electronic patient portals in different health care disciplines and settings has been increasing, but the rate of implementation in clinical practice still lags behind expectations. While studies have linked the use of electronic patient portals to positive health outcomes for patients, studies addressing the viewpoints of healthcare providers are rare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an online survey of attitudes of healthcare providers towards an electronic patient portal for mental health hospitals. The portal was developed by five communal providers of mental health care in different regions in Germany. The survey was carried out during the early phase of implementation of the portal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty project leaders and 37 clinicians from five different mental health hospitals answered the questionnaire (response rate: 45% and 28%). Overall, acceptance of online applications among respondents was high. The healthcare providers mentioned perceived benefits (e.g. accessibility of new patient groups, use of therapy-free periods) as well as a number of technical, structural, organizational and staffing barriers for successful implementation in hospital settings (e.g. workload of healthcare providers and lack of staff, limited digital competences, unstable WLAN).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The perceived barriers and facilitators of the implementation of online applications and electronic patient portals in mental health hospitals identified by healthcare providers may be taken into account. Improving commitment of the healthcare providers to implementation and use of digital interventions may help foster digitalisation in mental health hospitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465699/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11686-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11686-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:电子患者门户网站等数字工具在不同医疗学科和环境中的使用日益增多,但在临床实践中的实施率仍落后于预期。虽然有研究将电子患者门户网站的使用与患者的积极健康结果联系起来,但针对医疗服务提供者观点的研究却很少见:我们对医疗服务提供者对精神卫生医院电子患者门户网站的态度进行了在线调查。该门户网站由德国不同地区的五家精神卫生医疗机构共同开发。调查是在门户网站实施初期进行的:来自五家不同精神病院的 20 名项目负责人和 37 名临床医生回答了问卷(回答率分别为 45% 和 28%)。总体而言,受访者对在线应用的接受度很高。医疗服务提供者提到了他们所感受到的好处(如新患者群体的可及性、无治疗期的使用),以及在医院环境中成功实施的一些技术、结构、组织和人员方面的障碍(如医疗服务提供者的工作量和人员缺乏、有限的数字能力、不稳定的无线局域网):结论:医疗服务提供者认为在精神卫生医院实施在线应用程序和电子患者门户网站存在的障碍和促进因素可以纳入考虑范围。提高医疗服务提供者对实施和使用数字化干预措施的承诺可能有助于促进精神病院的数字化进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementation of an electronic patient portal in routine mental health care of hospitals in Germany - evaluation of attitudes of healthcare providers.

Background: The use of digital tools such as electronic patient portals in different health care disciplines and settings has been increasing, but the rate of implementation in clinical practice still lags behind expectations. While studies have linked the use of electronic patient portals to positive health outcomes for patients, studies addressing the viewpoints of healthcare providers are rare.

Methods: We performed an online survey of attitudes of healthcare providers towards an electronic patient portal for mental health hospitals. The portal was developed by five communal providers of mental health care in different regions in Germany. The survey was carried out during the early phase of implementation of the portal.

Results: Twenty project leaders and 37 clinicians from five different mental health hospitals answered the questionnaire (response rate: 45% and 28%). Overall, acceptance of online applications among respondents was high. The healthcare providers mentioned perceived benefits (e.g. accessibility of new patient groups, use of therapy-free periods) as well as a number of technical, structural, organizational and staffing barriers for successful implementation in hospital settings (e.g. workload of healthcare providers and lack of staff, limited digital competences, unstable WLAN).

Conclusion: The perceived barriers and facilitators of the implementation of online applications and electronic patient portals in mental health hospitals identified by healthcare providers may be taken into account. Improving commitment of the healthcare providers to implementation and use of digital interventions may help foster digitalisation in mental health hospitals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Employer support for health and social care registered professionals, their patients and service users involved in regulatory fitness to practise regulatory proceedings. Factors influencing the turnover intention for disease control and prevention workers in Northeast China: an empirical analysis based on logistic-ISM model. Qualitative drivers of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics use and resistance in Ethiopia. Supporting young people through the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: a multi-site qualitative longitudinal study. The potential promise and pitfalls of point-of-care viral load monitoring to expedite HIV treatment decision-making in rural Uganda: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1