EMA 批准的非艾滋病毒抗病毒药物开发过程中的临床前和临床研究:叙述性综述。

IF 10.9 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Clinical Microbiology and Infection Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2024.10.001
Lena Pracher, Markus Zeitlinger
{"title":"EMA 批准的非艾滋病毒抗病毒药物开发过程中的临床前和临床研究:叙述性综述。","authors":"Lena Pracher, Markus Zeitlinger","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Viral diseases represent a substantial global health challenge, necessitating the urgent development of effective antiviral medications.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aims to present a thorough examination of systemic antiviral drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) since its founding, excluding those targeting HIV, with a focus on preclinical and clinical studies in the drug development process.</p><p><strong>Sources: </strong>Data was extracted from the European Public Assessment Reports and Summary of Product Characteristics issued by the EMA.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>In total, 21 currently approved agents were analysed with a focus on preclinical and clinical studies. The majority of substances have been approved for hepatitis C (38%) and B (19%) followed by influenza and SARS-CoV-2 (14% and 10%, respectively). A smaller subset obtained approval for the indications of hepatitis D, cytomegalovirus, and pox viruses. As for preclinical studies, heterogeneity in the methods used for efficacy studies was observed, which is at least partly explained by the diverse nature of viruses and their hosts and the lack of general guidelines for antiviral pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies by the EMA. Clinical studies varied in sample sizes, ranging from a few hundred to several thousand patients. Many antiviral agents have a high potential for cytochrome P450 (CYP) and other enzyme interactions, resulting in the need for a high number of drug-drug interaction studies. Special market authorizations are available, including conditional approval for urgently required drugs such as nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for the treatment of COVID-19, and authorization under exceptional circumstances when comprehensive data cannot be provided, as seen with tecovirimat for pox viruses.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Streamlining the drug development process of antiviral substances and providing more guidelines would be crucial given the ongoing demand for effective treatment options for existing and new viral diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preclinical and clinical studies in the drug development process of European Medicines Agency-approved non-HIV antiviral agents: a narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Lena Pracher, Markus Zeitlinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmi.2024.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Viral diseases represent a substantial global health challenge, necessitating the urgent development of effective antiviral medications.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aims to present a thorough examination of systemic antiviral drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) since its founding, excluding those targeting HIV, with a focus on preclinical and clinical studies in the drug development process.</p><p><strong>Sources: </strong>Data was extracted from the European Public Assessment Reports and Summary of Product Characteristics issued by the EMA.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>In total, 21 currently approved agents were analysed with a focus on preclinical and clinical studies. The majority of substances have been approved for hepatitis C (38%) and B (19%) followed by influenza and SARS-CoV-2 (14% and 10%, respectively). A smaller subset obtained approval for the indications of hepatitis D, cytomegalovirus, and pox viruses. As for preclinical studies, heterogeneity in the methods used for efficacy studies was observed, which is at least partly explained by the diverse nature of viruses and their hosts and the lack of general guidelines for antiviral pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies by the EMA. Clinical studies varied in sample sizes, ranging from a few hundred to several thousand patients. Many antiviral agents have a high potential for cytochrome P450 (CYP) and other enzyme interactions, resulting in the need for a high number of drug-drug interaction studies. Special market authorizations are available, including conditional approval for urgently required drugs such as nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for the treatment of COVID-19, and authorization under exceptional circumstances when comprehensive data cannot be provided, as seen with tecovirimat for pox viruses.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Streamlining the drug development process of antiviral substances and providing more guidelines would be crucial given the ongoing demand for effective treatment options for existing and new viral diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Microbiology and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2024.10.001\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2024.10.001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:病毒性疾病是一项重大的全球健康挑战,迫切需要开发有效的抗病毒药物:本综述旨在对欧洲药品管理局(EMA)自成立以来批准的全身性抗病毒药物(不包括针对艾滋病毒的药物)进行全面审查,重点关注药物开发过程中的临床前和临床研究:数据摘自欧洲药品管理局发布的《欧洲公共评估报告》(EPAR)和《产品特征摘要》(SmPC):内容:共分析了 21 种目前已获批准的药物,重点是临床前和临床研究。大多数药物获批用于丙型肝炎(38%)和乙型肝炎(19%),其次是流感和 Sars-CoV-2 (14% 和 10%)。还有一小部分药物获准用于治疗丁型肝炎、巨细胞病毒和痘病毒。至于临床前研究,疗效研究采用的方法不尽相同,这至少部分是由于病毒及其宿主的性质多种多样,以及欧洲药品管理局(EMA)缺乏关于抗病毒 PK/PD 研究的一般指导原则。临床研究的样本量各不相同,从几百到几千名患者不等。许多抗病毒药物极有可能与 CYP 和其他酶发生相互作用,因此需要进行大量的药物相互作用研究。目前有一些特殊的市场授权,包括有条件批准治疗 COVID-19 的尼马瑞韦/利托那韦等急需药物,以及在无法提供全面数据的特殊情况下的授权,如治疗痘病毒的替考韦瑞(tecovirimat):意义:简化抗病毒药物的研发流程并提供更多指导至关重要,因为现有和新的病毒性疾病都需要有效的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preclinical and clinical studies in the drug development process of European Medicines Agency-approved non-HIV antiviral agents: a narrative review.

Background: Viral diseases represent a substantial global health challenge, necessitating the urgent development of effective antiviral medications.

Objectives: This review aims to present a thorough examination of systemic antiviral drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) since its founding, excluding those targeting HIV, with a focus on preclinical and clinical studies in the drug development process.

Sources: Data was extracted from the European Public Assessment Reports and Summary of Product Characteristics issued by the EMA.

Content: In total, 21 currently approved agents were analysed with a focus on preclinical and clinical studies. The majority of substances have been approved for hepatitis C (38%) and B (19%) followed by influenza and SARS-CoV-2 (14% and 10%, respectively). A smaller subset obtained approval for the indications of hepatitis D, cytomegalovirus, and pox viruses. As for preclinical studies, heterogeneity in the methods used for efficacy studies was observed, which is at least partly explained by the diverse nature of viruses and their hosts and the lack of general guidelines for antiviral pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies by the EMA. Clinical studies varied in sample sizes, ranging from a few hundred to several thousand patients. Many antiviral agents have a high potential for cytochrome P450 (CYP) and other enzyme interactions, resulting in the need for a high number of drug-drug interaction studies. Special market authorizations are available, including conditional approval for urgently required drugs such as nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for the treatment of COVID-19, and authorization under exceptional circumstances when comprehensive data cannot be provided, as seen with tecovirimat for pox viruses.

Implications: Streamlining the drug development process of antiviral substances and providing more guidelines would be crucial given the ongoing demand for effective treatment options for existing and new viral diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
期刊最新文献
Establishing piperacillin-tazobactam susceptibility in ceftriaxone non-susceptible Enterobacterales: comparing disk diffusion, Etest, and VITEK 2 automated MIC measurements vs. broth microdilution. Ceftaroline for bloodstream infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Clinical and mycological outcomes of candidaemia and/or invasive candidiasis by Candida spp. and antifungal susceptibility: pooled analyses of two randomised trials of rezafungin versus caspofungin. Development and validation of selection algorithms for a non-ventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia (nvHAP) semi-automated surveillance system. Diagnosing infectious encephalitis: a Narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1