产科肛门括约肌损伤的处理和随访临床实践:综合综述。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.042
Marine Lallemant , Alessandro Ferdinando Ruffolo , Yohan Kerbage , Charles Garadebian , Louise Ghesquiere , Chrystèle Rubod , Michel Cosson
{"title":"产科肛门括约肌损伤的处理和随访临床实践:综合综述。","authors":"Marine Lallemant ,&nbsp;Alessandro Ferdinando Ruffolo ,&nbsp;Yohan Kerbage ,&nbsp;Charles Garadebian ,&nbsp;Louise Ghesquiere ,&nbsp;Chrystèle Rubod ,&nbsp;Michel Cosson","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To review and compare existing guidelines on the intrapartum management and postpartum follow-up of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review of clinical guidelines related to OASIS management, focusing on intrapartum care and postpartum follow-up. Searches were performed in July 2024 across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Guidelines published after 2010 in English were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nine national guidelines were included. There was a consensus on OASIS classification and immediate management, particularly regarding suture techniques, materials, and the necessity of adequate analgesia. However, notable variations were identified in the timing of repair, specialist involvement, use of prophylactic antibiotics, and post-operative care protocols. Postpartum follow-up practices also varied, especially regarding the role of physiotherapy and the timing of specialist consultations, reflecting inconsistencies in long-term care recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Significant variability existed in the guidelines for the management and follow-up of OASIS, particularly in postpartum care. This study underscored the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines to ensure consistent and optimal care for women affected by OASIS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"302 ","pages":"Pages 362-369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical practices in the management and follow-up of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a comprehensive review\",\"authors\":\"Marine Lallemant ,&nbsp;Alessandro Ferdinando Ruffolo ,&nbsp;Yohan Kerbage ,&nbsp;Charles Garadebian ,&nbsp;Louise Ghesquiere ,&nbsp;Chrystèle Rubod ,&nbsp;Michel Cosson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To review and compare existing guidelines on the intrapartum management and postpartum follow-up of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review of clinical guidelines related to OASIS management, focusing on intrapartum care and postpartum follow-up. Searches were performed in July 2024 across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Guidelines published after 2010 in English were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nine national guidelines were included. There was a consensus on OASIS classification and immediate management, particularly regarding suture techniques, materials, and the necessity of adequate analgesia. However, notable variations were identified in the timing of repair, specialist involvement, use of prophylactic antibiotics, and post-operative care protocols. Postpartum follow-up practices also varied, especially regarding the role of physiotherapy and the timing of specialist consultations, reflecting inconsistencies in long-term care recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Significant variability existed in the guidelines for the management and follow-up of OASIS, particularly in postpartum care. This study underscored the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines to ensure consistent and optimal care for women affected by OASIS.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology\",\"volume\":\"302 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 362-369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524005360\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524005360","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的回顾并比较现有的产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)产期管理和产后随访指南 方法:我们对与 OASIS 管理相关的临床指南进行了系统性回顾,重点关注产期护理和产后随访。我们于 2024 年 7 月在多个数据库中进行了检索,包括 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆。结果:结果:共纳入了九份国家指南。在 OASIS 分类和即时管理方面已达成共识,尤其是在缝合技术、材料和充分镇痛的必要性方面。然而,在修复时机、专家参与、预防性抗生素的使用以及术后护理方案等方面存在明显差异。产后随访的做法也不尽相同,尤其是在物理治疗的作用和专家会诊的时间方面,这反映出长期护理建议的不一致:结论:OASIS 的管理和随访指南存在很大差异,尤其是在产后护理方面。这项研究强调,有必要制定以证据为基础的标准化指南,以确保为受 OASIS 影响的妇女提供一致和最佳的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical practices in the management and follow-up of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a comprehensive review

Objectives

To review and compare existing guidelines on the intrapartum management and postpartum follow-up of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of clinical guidelines related to OASIS management, focusing on intrapartum care and postpartum follow-up. Searches were performed in July 2024 across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Guidelines published after 2010 in English were included.

Results

Nine national guidelines were included. There was a consensus on OASIS classification and immediate management, particularly regarding suture techniques, materials, and the necessity of adequate analgesia. However, notable variations were identified in the timing of repair, specialist involvement, use of prophylactic antibiotics, and post-operative care protocols. Postpartum follow-up practices also varied, especially regarding the role of physiotherapy and the timing of specialist consultations, reflecting inconsistencies in long-term care recommendations.

Conclusion

Significant variability existed in the guidelines for the management and follow-up of OASIS, particularly in postpartum care. This study underscored the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines to ensure consistent and optimal care for women affected by OASIS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Inside Back Cover - Editors with images Corrigendum to “Prophylactic tranexamic acid during myomectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials” [Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 276 (2022) 82–91] Survival outcomes of endometrial cancer patients with disease involving the lower uterine segment: A meta-analysis Outcomes of first assisted reproductive technology treatment in infertile women with and without antinuclear antibodies: A prospective cohort study Maternal and neonatal outcomes of prolonged second stage of labor with delayed pushing: A study of French Perinatal practices before and after guideline changes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1