种族或民族与大肠埃希菌产生广谱β-内酰胺酶的关系:病例对照研究。

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-10 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofae516
Alice N Hemenway, Mark Biagi, Timothy F Murrey, Jiehuan Sun, Erica Osei-Badu, Adriana Salazar-McKinney, Ricardo Sanabria, Moamen Al Zoubi
{"title":"种族或民族与大肠埃希菌产生广谱β-内酰胺酶的关系:病例对照研究。","authors":"Alice N Hemenway, Mark Biagi, Timothy F Murrey, Jiehuan Sun, Erica Osei-Badu, Adriana Salazar-McKinney, Ricardo Sanabria, Moamen Al Zoubi","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are limited and conflicting data regarding the impact of race or ethnicity on the rate of gram-negative antimicrobial resistance. This study was performed to determine whether there is a difference in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) <i>Escherichia coli</i> infection or colonization in minoritized patients when compared to White patients from a diverse US Midwestern city.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case control study was performed, with controls with non-ESBL <i>E. coli</i> matched 1:1 to patients with ESBL-producing <i>E coli</i> based on age, sex, and ZIP code. A variety of other evidence-based factors for ESBL Enterobacterales infection and colonization were collected via chart review. Multivariate conditional logistic regression assessed the odds of minoritized patients as compared to White patients, while controlling for other common risk factors for ESBL Enterobacterales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 364 matched pairs were included in the analysis. Females were the majority of the sample (91%), with median age of 65 years. The majority of the sample identified as White (73%), followed by Hispanic (14%) and Black (10%). Urine cultures made up the majority of the cultures in the sample (97%), and this was similar between ESBL and non-ESBL groups. While controlling for these risk factors for ESBL <i>E coli</i>, minoritized patients had a statistically significant greater odds of ESBL-producing <i>E coli</i> (odds ratio, 2.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-3.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our sample, which is demographically similar to the United States, minoritized patients had higher odds of ESBL-producing <i>E coli</i>. Further research on the drivers for this disparity is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"11 10","pages":"ofae516"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Race or Ethnicity With Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Production in <i>Escherichia Coli</i>: A Case Control Study.\",\"authors\":\"Alice N Hemenway, Mark Biagi, Timothy F Murrey, Jiehuan Sun, Erica Osei-Badu, Adriana Salazar-McKinney, Ricardo Sanabria, Moamen Al Zoubi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ofid/ofae516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are limited and conflicting data regarding the impact of race or ethnicity on the rate of gram-negative antimicrobial resistance. This study was performed to determine whether there is a difference in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) <i>Escherichia coli</i> infection or colonization in minoritized patients when compared to White patients from a diverse US Midwestern city.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case control study was performed, with controls with non-ESBL <i>E. coli</i> matched 1:1 to patients with ESBL-producing <i>E coli</i> based on age, sex, and ZIP code. A variety of other evidence-based factors for ESBL Enterobacterales infection and colonization were collected via chart review. Multivariate conditional logistic regression assessed the odds of minoritized patients as compared to White patients, while controlling for other common risk factors for ESBL Enterobacterales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 364 matched pairs were included in the analysis. Females were the majority of the sample (91%), with median age of 65 years. The majority of the sample identified as White (73%), followed by Hispanic (14%) and Black (10%). Urine cultures made up the majority of the cultures in the sample (97%), and this was similar between ESBL and non-ESBL groups. While controlling for these risk factors for ESBL <i>E coli</i>, minoritized patients had a statistically significant greater odds of ESBL-producing <i>E coli</i> (odds ratio, 2.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-3.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our sample, which is demographically similar to the United States, minoritized patients had higher odds of ESBL-producing <i>E coli</i>. Further research on the drivers for this disparity is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"11 10\",\"pages\":\"ofae516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465405/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae516\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于种族或民族对革兰阴性抗菌药耐药率的影响,目前的数据有限且相互矛盾。本研究旨在确定,与来自美国中西部一个多元化城市的白人患者相比,少数族裔患者的广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)大肠埃希菌感染或定植是否存在差异:进行了一项病例对照研究,根据年龄、性别和邮政编码,将非ESBL大肠杆菌对照组与ESBL大肠杆菌患者进行1:1配对。通过病历审查收集了 ESBL 肠杆菌感染和定植的各种其他循证因素。多变量条件逻辑回归评估了少数民族患者与白人患者相比的几率,同时控制了 ESBL 肠杆菌感染的其他常见风险因素:共有 364 对匹配的患者被纳入分析。样本中女性占大多数(91%),年龄中位数为 65 岁。大多数样本为白人(73%),其次是西班牙裔(14%)和黑人(10%)。尿液培养占样本培养的绝大部分(97%),ESBL组和非ESBL组的情况相似。在控制这些ESBL大肠杆菌风险因素的情况下,少数族裔患者感染ESBL大肠杆菌的几率明显更高(几率比为2.53;95%置信区间为1.68-3.82):我们的样本在人口统计学上与美国相似,少数族裔患者感染产ESBL大肠杆菌的几率更高。需要进一步研究造成这种差异的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of Race or Ethnicity With Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Production in Escherichia Coli: A Case Control Study.

Background: There are limited and conflicting data regarding the impact of race or ethnicity on the rate of gram-negative antimicrobial resistance. This study was performed to determine whether there is a difference in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) Escherichia coli infection or colonization in minoritized patients when compared to White patients from a diverse US Midwestern city.

Methods: A case control study was performed, with controls with non-ESBL E. coli matched 1:1 to patients with ESBL-producing E coli based on age, sex, and ZIP code. A variety of other evidence-based factors for ESBL Enterobacterales infection and colonization were collected via chart review. Multivariate conditional logistic regression assessed the odds of minoritized patients as compared to White patients, while controlling for other common risk factors for ESBL Enterobacterales.

Results: A total of 364 matched pairs were included in the analysis. Females were the majority of the sample (91%), with median age of 65 years. The majority of the sample identified as White (73%), followed by Hispanic (14%) and Black (10%). Urine cultures made up the majority of the cultures in the sample (97%), and this was similar between ESBL and non-ESBL groups. While controlling for these risk factors for ESBL E coli, minoritized patients had a statistically significant greater odds of ESBL-producing E coli (odds ratio, 2.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-3.82).

Conclusions: In our sample, which is demographically similar to the United States, minoritized patients had higher odds of ESBL-producing E coli. Further research on the drivers for this disparity is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Enterovirus D68: Genomic and Clinical Comparison of 2 Seasons of Increased Viral Circulation and Discrepant Incidence of Acute Flaccid Myelitis-Maryland, USA. Early Mortality and Health Care Costs in Patients Recently Diagnosed With Kaposi Sarcoma at the National Cancer Institute, Mexico City. Gut Microbiome in Human Melioidosis: Composition and Resistome Dynamics from Diagnosis to Discovery. Breakthrough Rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infections After Meningococcal B Vaccination: Microbiological and Clinical Features. Lack of Detection of Norwalk Virus in Saliva Samples From a Controlled Human Infection Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1