{"title":"访问患者门户网站与更高的糖尿病眼科检查完成率有关。","authors":"Selin Gumustop, Andrew Popelka, David J Ramsey","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2024.2406506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate factors associated with a higher completion rate of annual diabetic eye examinations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM) who were aged 18-75 years and receiving primary care in a suburban integrated delivery network (IDN). Patient demographic, sociomedical, biometric characteristics, and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures within the Comprehensive Diabetes Care bundle were extracted from the electronic health record (EHR) and analyzed by using multivariate logistic regression to assess factors associated with completion of an eye exam (retinal) performed during the study year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 19,901 primary care patients with DM, 35.15% completed an eye examination in 2021. After adjusting for demographic and biometric characteristics, the two factors most closely associated with completing a diabetic eye examination were having had a primary care office visit (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.525; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.210-3.871, <i>p</i> < 0.001) or an eye examination in the prior year (aOR, 2.948; 95% CI, 2.752-3.158, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The next most important factor to emerge was having an activated, online patient portal (PP; aOR, 1.737; 95% CI, 1.592-1.896; <i>p</i> < 0.001) or PP recently activated within the prior year (aOR, 1.387; 95% CI, 1.220-1.576, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surveillance for diabetic retinopathy relies on annual diabetic eye examinations yet adherence to that standard remains unacceptably low. Our study suggests that engagement of patients through an online PP could help increase this rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to a Patient Portal is Associated with a Higher Rate of Diabetic Eye Examination Completion.\",\"authors\":\"Selin Gumustop, Andrew Popelka, David J Ramsey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09286586.2024.2406506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate factors associated with a higher completion rate of annual diabetic eye examinations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM) who were aged 18-75 years and receiving primary care in a suburban integrated delivery network (IDN). Patient demographic, sociomedical, biometric characteristics, and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures within the Comprehensive Diabetes Care bundle were extracted from the electronic health record (EHR) and analyzed by using multivariate logistic regression to assess factors associated with completion of an eye exam (retinal) performed during the study year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 19,901 primary care patients with DM, 35.15% completed an eye examination in 2021. After adjusting for demographic and biometric characteristics, the two factors most closely associated with completing a diabetic eye examination were having had a primary care office visit (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.525; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.210-3.871, <i>p</i> < 0.001) or an eye examination in the prior year (aOR, 2.948; 95% CI, 2.752-3.158, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The next most important factor to emerge was having an activated, online patient portal (PP; aOR, 1.737; 95% CI, 1.592-1.896; <i>p</i> < 0.001) or PP recently activated within the prior year (aOR, 1.387; 95% CI, 1.220-1.576, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surveillance for diabetic retinopathy relies on annual diabetic eye examinations yet adherence to that standard remains unacceptably low. Our study suggests that engagement of patients through an online PP could help increase this rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2024.2406506\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2024.2406506","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估提高糖尿病患者眼科年度检查完成率的相关因素:这项回顾性横断面研究纳入了年龄在 18-75 岁之间、在郊区综合服务网络(IDN)接受初级医疗服务的糖尿病(DM)确诊患者。研究人员从电子健康记录(EHR)中提取了患者的人口统计学、社会医学、生物统计学特征以及糖尿病综合护理捆绑计划中的医疗保健有效性数据和信息集(HEDIS)测量指标,并通过多变量逻辑回归进行分析,以评估在研究年度内完成眼科检查(视网膜)的相关因素:在 19901 名患有糖尿病的初级保健患者中,35.15% 在 2021 年完成了眼科检查。在对人口统计学和生物统计学特征进行调整后,与完成糖尿病眼科检查最密切相关的两个因素是曾在初级保健诊所就诊(调整后的几率比[aOR],3.525;95%置信区间[CI],3.210-3.871,p p p p 结论:糖尿病视网膜监测是一项复杂的系统工程:糖尿病视网膜病变的监测依赖于每年一次的糖尿病眼科检查,但这一标准的坚持率仍然低得令人无法接受。我们的研究表明,通过在线PP让患者参与进来有助于提高这一比例。
Access to a Patient Portal is Associated with a Higher Rate of Diabetic Eye Examination Completion.
Purpose: To evaluate factors associated with a higher completion rate of annual diabetic eye examinations.
Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM) who were aged 18-75 years and receiving primary care in a suburban integrated delivery network (IDN). Patient demographic, sociomedical, biometric characteristics, and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures within the Comprehensive Diabetes Care bundle were extracted from the electronic health record (EHR) and analyzed by using multivariate logistic regression to assess factors associated with completion of an eye exam (retinal) performed during the study year.
Results: Among 19,901 primary care patients with DM, 35.15% completed an eye examination in 2021. After adjusting for demographic and biometric characteristics, the two factors most closely associated with completing a diabetic eye examination were having had a primary care office visit (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.525; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.210-3.871, p < 0.001) or an eye examination in the prior year (aOR, 2.948; 95% CI, 2.752-3.158, p < 0.001). The next most important factor to emerge was having an activated, online patient portal (PP; aOR, 1.737; 95% CI, 1.592-1.896; p < 0.001) or PP recently activated within the prior year (aOR, 1.387; 95% CI, 1.220-1.576, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Surveillance for diabetic retinopathy relies on annual diabetic eye examinations yet adherence to that standard remains unacceptably low. Our study suggests that engagement of patients through an online PP could help increase this rate.
期刊介绍:
Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.