传统隔离系统与新型隔离工具(口内颊唇牵引器开口工具)的操作简易性和患者接受度的比较评估。

Keyur M Chauhan, Vasudha Sodani, Devdatt J Sharma, Harsh H Solanki, Reetu D Shah, Vaishnavi R Agarwal
{"title":"传统隔离系统与新型隔离工具(口内颊唇牵引器开口工具)的操作简易性和患者接受度的比较评估。","authors":"Keyur M Chauhan, Vasudha Sodani, Devdatt J Sharma, Harsh H Solanki, Reetu D Shah, Vaishnavi R Agarwal","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Isolation plays an important role in dentistry. It is mandatory to maintain isolation during various dental treatments. A simple new isolation tool (intraoral cheek and lip retractor mouth opener tool) is available, which is a multipurpose tool. The need for the study was to evaluate the functionality of the new isolation tool.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare the traditional isolation method with the new isolation tool. A questionnaire pattern was adopted for the present study. The study was then conducted to evaluate the patient acceptability and ease of access for the operator.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total 200 pediatric patients were included in the study; they were divided into two groups. Group I-isolation with the new isolation tool, group II-isolation with cotton rolls and a mouth mirror. A structured questionnaire was given to the operators to evaluate the ease of use of the new isolation tool. A Likert scale was provided to the patients to evaluate the comfort of the new isolation tool during various treatments.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Statistical analysis shows significant results by obtaining the <i>p</i>-value < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study clearly shows that the new isolation tool is a better option in terms of retracting soft tissue, keeping the mouth open, and maintaining isolation.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This new tool helps in the retraction of soft tissue as well as isolation, and it also keeps the mouth open.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Chauhan KM, Sodani V, Sharma DJ, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Evaluation of Ease of Operator and Patient Acceptability Using the Traditional Isolation System vs a New Isolation Tool (Intraoral Cheek and Lip Retractor Mouth Opener Tool). Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(6):637-640.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"17 6","pages":"637-640"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463806/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of Ease of Operator and Patient Acceptability Using the Traditional Isolation System vs a New Isolation Tool (Intraoral Cheek and Lip Retractor Mouth Opener Tool).\",\"authors\":\"Keyur M Chauhan, Vasudha Sodani, Devdatt J Sharma, Harsh H Solanki, Reetu D Shah, Vaishnavi R Agarwal\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Isolation plays an important role in dentistry. It is mandatory to maintain isolation during various dental treatments. A simple new isolation tool (intraoral cheek and lip retractor mouth opener tool) is available, which is a multipurpose tool. The need for the study was to evaluate the functionality of the new isolation tool.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare the traditional isolation method with the new isolation tool. A questionnaire pattern was adopted for the present study. The study was then conducted to evaluate the patient acceptability and ease of access for the operator.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total 200 pediatric patients were included in the study; they were divided into two groups. Group I-isolation with the new isolation tool, group II-isolation with cotton rolls and a mouth mirror. A structured questionnaire was given to the operators to evaluate the ease of use of the new isolation tool. A Likert scale was provided to the patients to evaluate the comfort of the new isolation tool during various treatments.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Statistical analysis shows significant results by obtaining the <i>p</i>-value < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study clearly shows that the new isolation tool is a better option in terms of retracting soft tissue, keeping the mouth open, and maintaining isolation.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This new tool helps in the retraction of soft tissue as well as isolation, and it also keeps the mouth open.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Chauhan KM, Sodani V, Sharma DJ, <i>et al.</i> Comparative Evaluation of Ease of Operator and Patient Acceptability Using the Traditional Isolation System vs a New Isolation Tool (Intraoral Cheek and Lip Retractor Mouth Opener Tool). Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(6):637-640.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"637-640\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463806/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2854\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

隔离在牙科中发挥着重要作用。在各种牙科治疗过程中,必须保持隔离。目前有一种简单的新型隔离工具(口内颊唇牵开器开口工具),它是一种多用途工具。研究目的:本研究旨在比较传统隔离方法和新型隔离工具。本研究采用了问卷调查的模式。材料和方法:本研究共纳入 200 名儿科患者:研究共纳入 200 名儿科患者,将他们分为两组。第一组使用新型隔离工具进行隔离,第二组使用棉卷和口镜进行隔离。向操作人员发放了一份结构化问卷,以评估新隔离工具的易用性。向患者提供了一个李克特量表,以评估新隔离工具在各种治疗过程中的舒适度:结果:统计分析表明,P 值小于 0.05,结果意义重大:研究清楚地表明,新型隔离工具在牵拉软组织、保持口腔张开和保持隔离方面是一种更好的选择:临床意义:这种新工具有助于牵拉软组织和隔离,还能保持口腔张开:Chauhan KM, Sodani V, Sharma DJ, et al. 传统隔离系统与新型隔离工具(口内颊唇牵开器张口工具)操作简便性与患者接受度的比较评估。Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(6):637-640.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Evaluation of Ease of Operator and Patient Acceptability Using the Traditional Isolation System vs a New Isolation Tool (Intraoral Cheek and Lip Retractor Mouth Opener Tool).

Isolation plays an important role in dentistry. It is mandatory to maintain isolation during various dental treatments. A simple new isolation tool (intraoral cheek and lip retractor mouth opener tool) is available, which is a multipurpose tool. The need for the study was to evaluate the functionality of the new isolation tool.

Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the traditional isolation method with the new isolation tool. A questionnaire pattern was adopted for the present study. The study was then conducted to evaluate the patient acceptability and ease of access for the operator.

Materials and methods: A total 200 pediatric patients were included in the study; they were divided into two groups. Group I-isolation with the new isolation tool, group II-isolation with cotton rolls and a mouth mirror. A structured questionnaire was given to the operators to evaluate the ease of use of the new isolation tool. A Likert scale was provided to the patients to evaluate the comfort of the new isolation tool during various treatments.

Result: Statistical analysis shows significant results by obtaining the p-value < 0.05.

Conclusion: The study clearly shows that the new isolation tool is a better option in terms of retracting soft tissue, keeping the mouth open, and maintaining isolation.

Clinical significance: This new tool helps in the retraction of soft tissue as well as isolation, and it also keeps the mouth open.

How to cite this article: Chauhan KM, Sodani V, Sharma DJ, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Ease of Operator and Patient Acceptability Using the Traditional Isolation System vs a New Isolation Tool (Intraoral Cheek and Lip Retractor Mouth Opener Tool). Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(6):637-640.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
期刊最新文献
Clinical Performance of Two Resin Composite Materials in Class II Cavities in Primary Molars: An Observational Study. An In Vivo Study to Compare and Evaluate the Antimicrobial Efficacy and pH Change of GC Tooth Mousse and CurodontTM Protect against Streptococcus mutans. Bite Force Distribution and Occlusal Adjustment in Stainless Steel Crowns and BioFlx Crowns of Children Aged 4-8 Years. Clinical Assessment of a Newer Resin-based Bioactive Restorative Cement on Class II Cavities of Primary Molars: A Comparative Analysis. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Photodynamic Therapy in Root Canal Treatment of Primary Molars: A 15-month Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1