医生利他主义与支出、入院率和急诊就诊率。

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMA Health Forum Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3383
Lawrence P Casalino, Shachar Kariv, Daniel Markovits, Raymond Fisman, Jing Li
{"title":"医生利他主义与支出、入院率和急诊就诊率。","authors":"Lawrence P Casalino, Shachar Kariv, Daniel Markovits, Raymond Fisman, Jing Li","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Altruism-putting the patient first-is a fundamental component of physician professionalism. Evidence is lacking about the relationship between physician altruism, care quality, and spending.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether there is a relationship between physician altruism, measures of quality, and spending, hypothesizing that altruistic physicians have better results.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study that used a validated economic experiment to measure altruism was carried out between October 2018 and November 2019 using a nationwide sample of US primary care physicians and cardiologists. Altruism data were linked to 2019 Medicare claims and multivariable regressions were used to examine the relationship between altruism and quality and spending measures. Overall, 250 physicians in 43 medical practices that varied in size, location, and ownership, and 7626 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries attributed to the physicians were included. The analysis was conducted from April 2022 to August 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Physicians completed a widely used modified dictator-game style web-based experiment; based on their responses, they were categorized as more or less altruistic.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Potentially preventable hospital admissions, potentially preventable emergency department visits, and Medicare spending.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 1599 beneficiaries (21%) were attributed to the 45 physicians (18%) categorized as altruistic and 6027 patients were attributed to the 205 physicians not categorized as altruistic. Adjusting for patient, physician, and practice characteristics, patients of altruistic physicians had a lower likelihood of any potentially preventable admission (odds ratio [OR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.97; P = .03) and any potentially preventable emergency department visit (OR, 0.64; CI, 0.43-0.94; P = .02). Adjusted spending was 9.26% lower (95% CI, -16.24% to -2.27%; P = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cross-sectional study found that Medicare patients treated by altruistic physicians had fewer potentially preventable hospitalizations and emergency department visits and lower spending. Policymakers and leaders of hospitals, medical practices, and medical schools may want to consider creating incentives, organizational structures, and cultures that may increase, or at least do not decrease, physician altruism. Further research should seek to identify these and other modifiable factors, such as physician selection and training, that may shape physician altruism. Research could also analyze the relationship between altruism and quality and spending in additional medical practices, specialties, and countries, and use additional measures of quality and of patient experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physician Altruism and Spending, Hospital Admissions, and Emergency Department Visits.\",\"authors\":\"Lawrence P Casalino, Shachar Kariv, Daniel Markovits, Raymond Fisman, Jing Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Altruism-putting the patient first-is a fundamental component of physician professionalism. Evidence is lacking about the relationship between physician altruism, care quality, and spending.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether there is a relationship between physician altruism, measures of quality, and spending, hypothesizing that altruistic physicians have better results.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study that used a validated economic experiment to measure altruism was carried out between October 2018 and November 2019 using a nationwide sample of US primary care physicians and cardiologists. Altruism data were linked to 2019 Medicare claims and multivariable regressions were used to examine the relationship between altruism and quality and spending measures. Overall, 250 physicians in 43 medical practices that varied in size, location, and ownership, and 7626 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries attributed to the physicians were included. The analysis was conducted from April 2022 to August 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Physicians completed a widely used modified dictator-game style web-based experiment; based on their responses, they were categorized as more or less altruistic.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Potentially preventable hospital admissions, potentially preventable emergency department visits, and Medicare spending.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 1599 beneficiaries (21%) were attributed to the 45 physicians (18%) categorized as altruistic and 6027 patients were attributed to the 205 physicians not categorized as altruistic. Adjusting for patient, physician, and practice characteristics, patients of altruistic physicians had a lower likelihood of any potentially preventable admission (odds ratio [OR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.97; P = .03) and any potentially preventable emergency department visit (OR, 0.64; CI, 0.43-0.94; P = .02). Adjusted spending was 9.26% lower (95% CI, -16.24% to -2.27%; P = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cross-sectional study found that Medicare patients treated by altruistic physicians had fewer potentially preventable hospitalizations and emergency department visits and lower spending. Policymakers and leaders of hospitals, medical practices, and medical schools may want to consider creating incentives, organizational structures, and cultures that may increase, or at least do not decrease, physician altruism. Further research should seek to identify these and other modifiable factors, such as physician selection and training, that may shape physician altruism. Research could also analyze the relationship between altruism and quality and spending in additional medical practices, specialties, and countries, and use additional measures of quality and of patient experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:利他主义--把病人放在第一位--是医生职业精神的基本组成部分。有关医生利他主义、医疗质量和支出之间关系的证据尚缺:目的:确定医生利他主义、医疗质量和支出之间是否存在关系,假设利他主义医生的医疗效果更好:这项横断面研究使用一个经过验证的经济实验来衡量利他主义,研究于 2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 11 月期间进行,使用的是美国全国范围内的初级保健医生和心脏病专家样本。利他主义数据与 2019 年医疗保险理赔相关联,并使用多变量回归来检验利他主义与质量和支出指标之间的关系。研究共纳入了 43 家医疗机构的 250 名医生(这些医疗机构的规模、地点和所有权各不相同)和 7626 名医疗保险付费服务受益人。分析时间为 2022 年 4 月至 2024 年 8 月:医生们完成了一项广泛使用的改良独裁者游戏式网络实验;根据他们的回答,他们被分为利他主义较强或较弱的类型:主要衡量指标:潜在可预防的入院率、潜在可预防的急诊就诊率和医疗保险支出:共有 1599 名受益人(21%)归属于 45 名被归类为利他主义的医生(18%),6027 名患者归属于 205 名未被归类为利他主义的医生。在对患者、医生和诊所特征进行调整后,利他主义医生的患者接受任何潜在可预防入院治疗(几率比 [OR],0.60;95% CI,0.38-0.97;P = .03)和任何潜在可预防急诊就诊(OR,0.64;CI,0.43-0.94;P = .02)的可能性较低。调整后的支出降低了 9.26% (95% CI, -16.24% to -2.27%; P = .01):这项横断面研究发现,接受利他主义医生治疗的医疗保险患者的潜在可预防住院和急诊就诊次数较少,花费也较低。医院、医疗机构和医学院校的决策者和领导者可能需要考虑建立激励机制、组织结构和文化,以提高或至少不降低医生的利他主义。进一步的研究应设法确定这些因素和其他可改变的因素,如医生的选择和培训,这些因素可能会影响医生的利他主义。研究还可以分析利他主义与其他医疗实践、专科和国家的质量和支出之间的关系,并使用更多的质量和患者体验衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Physician Altruism and Spending, Hospital Admissions, and Emergency Department Visits.

Importance: Altruism-putting the patient first-is a fundamental component of physician professionalism. Evidence is lacking about the relationship between physician altruism, care quality, and spending.

Objective: To determine whether there is a relationship between physician altruism, measures of quality, and spending, hypothesizing that altruistic physicians have better results.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study that used a validated economic experiment to measure altruism was carried out between October 2018 and November 2019 using a nationwide sample of US primary care physicians and cardiologists. Altruism data were linked to 2019 Medicare claims and multivariable regressions were used to examine the relationship between altruism and quality and spending measures. Overall, 250 physicians in 43 medical practices that varied in size, location, and ownership, and 7626 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries attributed to the physicians were included. The analysis was conducted from April 2022 to August 2024.

Exposure: Physicians completed a widely used modified dictator-game style web-based experiment; based on their responses, they were categorized as more or less altruistic.

Main measures: Potentially preventable hospital admissions, potentially preventable emergency department visits, and Medicare spending.

Results: In all, 1599 beneficiaries (21%) were attributed to the 45 physicians (18%) categorized as altruistic and 6027 patients were attributed to the 205 physicians not categorized as altruistic. Adjusting for patient, physician, and practice characteristics, patients of altruistic physicians had a lower likelihood of any potentially preventable admission (odds ratio [OR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.97; P = .03) and any potentially preventable emergency department visit (OR, 0.64; CI, 0.43-0.94; P = .02). Adjusted spending was 9.26% lower (95% CI, -16.24% to -2.27%; P = .01).

Conclusions and relevance: This cross-sectional study found that Medicare patients treated by altruistic physicians had fewer potentially preventable hospitalizations and emergency department visits and lower spending. Policymakers and leaders of hospitals, medical practices, and medical schools may want to consider creating incentives, organizational structures, and cultures that may increase, or at least do not decrease, physician altruism. Further research should seek to identify these and other modifiable factors, such as physician selection and training, that may shape physician altruism. Research could also analyze the relationship between altruism and quality and spending in additional medical practices, specialties, and countries, and use additional measures of quality and of patient experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Cannabis Use During Early Pregnancy Following Recreational Cannabis Legalization. Change of Ownership and Quality of Home Health Agency Care. Errors in Conflict of Interest Disclosures. JAMA Health Forum. Surgeon Workforce in Underserved Communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1