护理背景下的热汇报与冷汇报:综合评述。

Fahad Zeed Alanez, Elaine Miller, Caroline F Morrison, Benjamin Kelcey, Robin Wagner
{"title":"护理背景下的热汇报与冷汇报:综合评述。","authors":"Fahad Zeed Alanez, Elaine Miller, Caroline F Morrison, Benjamin Kelcey, Robin Wagner","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20240529-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hot debriefing occurs shortly after simulations or real-life events, whereas cold debriefings occur after 24 hours. This integrative review examined the effects of hot versus cold debriefing after simulation on prelicensure students.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Whittemore and Knafl's five-stage method was followed. Databases searched included PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and PsycINFO. The inclusion criteria were studies published in English that involved prelicensure nursing students and measured the effect of hot or cold debriefing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Themes emerged from 10 studies and included clinical judgment and decision making, knowledge and skills, participant experiences, reflection, and psychological safety and self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hot debriefing was preferred by participants, but cold debriefing resulted in higher knowledge and skills scores. In addition, students in the cold debriefing group were more conformable and in a safe environment compared with the hot debriefing group. Drawing a strong conclusion was difficult due to heterogeneity in study designs and methods. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(10):653-658.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":"63 10","pages":"653-658"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hot Versus Cold Debriefing in a Nursing Context: An Integrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Fahad Zeed Alanez, Elaine Miller, Caroline F Morrison, Benjamin Kelcey, Robin Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/01484834-20240529-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hot debriefing occurs shortly after simulations or real-life events, whereas cold debriefings occur after 24 hours. This integrative review examined the effects of hot versus cold debriefing after simulation on prelicensure students.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Whittemore and Knafl's five-stage method was followed. Databases searched included PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and PsycINFO. The inclusion criteria were studies published in English that involved prelicensure nursing students and measured the effect of hot or cold debriefing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Themes emerged from 10 studies and included clinical judgment and decision making, knowledge and skills, participant experiences, reflection, and psychological safety and self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hot debriefing was preferred by participants, but cold debriefing resulted in higher knowledge and skills scores. In addition, students in the cold debriefing group were more conformable and in a safe environment compared with the hot debriefing group. Drawing a strong conclusion was difficult due to heterogeneity in study designs and methods. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(10):653-658.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of nursing education\",\"volume\":\"63 10\",\"pages\":\"653-658\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of nursing education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240529-02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240529-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:热汇报发生在模拟或真实事件发生后不久,而冷汇报则发生在 24 小时之后。本综述研究了模拟后热汇报与冷汇报对执照前学生的影响:方法:采用 Whittemore 和 Knafl 的五阶段法。检索的数据库包括 PubMed、CINAHL、Scopus 和 PsycINFO。纳入标准是以英语发表的涉及护士执照前学生的研究,并衡量了冷热汇报的效果:结果:10 项研究得出的主题包括临床判断与决策、知识与技能、参与者经验、反思、心理安全与自我效能:结论:参与者更喜欢热汇报,但冷汇报的知识和技能得分更高。此外,与热汇报组相比,冷汇报组的学生更容易接受,环境也更安全。由于研究设计和方法的异质性,很难得出有力的结论。[护理教育杂志》,2024;63(10):653-658。]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hot Versus Cold Debriefing in a Nursing Context: An Integrative Review.

Background: Hot debriefing occurs shortly after simulations or real-life events, whereas cold debriefings occur after 24 hours. This integrative review examined the effects of hot versus cold debriefing after simulation on prelicensure students.

Method: Whittemore and Knafl's five-stage method was followed. Databases searched included PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and PsycINFO. The inclusion criteria were studies published in English that involved prelicensure nursing students and measured the effect of hot or cold debriefing.

Results: Themes emerged from 10 studies and included clinical judgment and decision making, knowledge and skills, participant experiences, reflection, and psychological safety and self-efficacy.

Conclusion: Hot debriefing was preferred by participants, but cold debriefing resulted in higher knowledge and skills scores. In addition, students in the cold debriefing group were more conformable and in a safe environment compared with the hot debriefing group. Drawing a strong conclusion was difficult due to heterogeneity in study designs and methods. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(10):653-658.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Clinical Exposure on Examination Performance of Nursing Students. Understanding NCLEX-RN Repeat Writers' Learning Needs: A Pilot Developmental Design Research Study. "They Assume I'm Not Intelligent Just Because I Have an Accent": Supporting Retention of Nursing Students Who Speak English as an Additional Language. Care of the Transgender Surgical Client: A Video Simulation for Baccalaureate Nursing Students. Developing a Pilot Curriculum to Enhance Undergraduate Student Well-Being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1