慕尼黑选择性柴油车禁令及其对二氧化氮浓度的影响:准实验研究

IF 10.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environment International Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2024.109067
Anna Leibinger , Eva Rehfuess , Jacob Burns
{"title":"慕尼黑选择性柴油车禁令及其对二氧化氮浓度的影响:准实验研究","authors":"Anna Leibinger ,&nbsp;Eva Rehfuess ,&nbsp;Jacob Burns","doi":"10.1016/j.envint.2024.109067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The current limit on NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations of 40 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, set by the European Union, has been regularly exceeded in Munich, Germany. This limit will likely be reduced towards the WHO recommended target of 10 μg/m3. Against this backdrop, the city implemented a selective diesel vehicle ban within the existing low-emission zone in February 2023, targeting Euro 4 and older diesel vehicles. Our study investigated the effect of Munich’s selective diesel vehicle ban on NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations, focusing on the half-year period following its implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our study utilized a synthetic control approach (primary analysis) and a controlled interrupted time series approach (secondary analysis). These quasi-experimental methodologies create a ‘counterfactual’ no-intervention scenario, enabling comparison between observed and counterfactual scenarios to estimate an intervention effect. We employed historical controls, using routine data from multiple monitoring stations located within and outside the low-emission zone for 2014 to 2022, and considered possible confounders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations within Munich’s low-emission zone showed overall declining trends from August 2014 to July 2023. Effects of the selective diesel vehicle ban were small and wide confidence intervals indicate large uncertainty in the magnitude and direction of the effect. At Landshuter Allee, the average intervention effect was −2.67 μg/m<sup>3</sup> (95 %-CI = [-12.72; 7.38]), at Stachus it was −2.74 μg/m<sup>3</sup> (95 %-CI = [-9.91; 4.42]), and at Lothstrasse it was −1.03 μg/m<sup>3</sup> (95 %-CI = [-7.75; 5.69]). The secondary analysis confirmed these findings, reinforcing uncertainty about the effect of the intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study suggests that Munich’s selective diesel vehicle ban had a limited effect on lowering NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations. Possible explanations include the ban’s focus on Euro 4 and older diesel vehicles, many exemptions to the selective ban, and unclear enforcement. This highlights that comprehensive approaches and ongoing, well-designed monitoring and evaluation are crucial for addressing urban air pollution and protecting public health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":308,"journal":{"name":"Environment International","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 109067"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Munich’s selective diesel vehicle ban and its impact on nitrogen dioxide concentrations: A quasi-experimental study\",\"authors\":\"Anna Leibinger ,&nbsp;Eva Rehfuess ,&nbsp;Jacob Burns\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envint.2024.109067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The current limit on NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations of 40 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, set by the European Union, has been regularly exceeded in Munich, Germany. This limit will likely be reduced towards the WHO recommended target of 10 μg/m3. Against this backdrop, the city implemented a selective diesel vehicle ban within the existing low-emission zone in February 2023, targeting Euro 4 and older diesel vehicles. Our study investigated the effect of Munich’s selective diesel vehicle ban on NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations, focusing on the half-year period following its implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our study utilized a synthetic control approach (primary analysis) and a controlled interrupted time series approach (secondary analysis). These quasi-experimental methodologies create a ‘counterfactual’ no-intervention scenario, enabling comparison between observed and counterfactual scenarios to estimate an intervention effect. We employed historical controls, using routine data from multiple monitoring stations located within and outside the low-emission zone for 2014 to 2022, and considered possible confounders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations within Munich’s low-emission zone showed overall declining trends from August 2014 to July 2023. Effects of the selective diesel vehicle ban were small and wide confidence intervals indicate large uncertainty in the magnitude and direction of the effect. At Landshuter Allee, the average intervention effect was −2.67 μg/m<sup>3</sup> (95 %-CI = [-12.72; 7.38]), at Stachus it was −2.74 μg/m<sup>3</sup> (95 %-CI = [-9.91; 4.42]), and at Lothstrasse it was −1.03 μg/m<sup>3</sup> (95 %-CI = [-7.75; 5.69]). The secondary analysis confirmed these findings, reinforcing uncertainty about the effect of the intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study suggests that Munich’s selective diesel vehicle ban had a limited effect on lowering NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations. Possible explanations include the ban’s focus on Euro 4 and older diesel vehicles, many exemptions to the selective ban, and unclear enforcement. This highlights that comprehensive approaches and ongoing, well-designed monitoring and evaluation are crucial for addressing urban air pollution and protecting public health.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment International\",\"volume\":\"193 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412024006536\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment International","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412024006536","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 目前,德国慕尼黑的二氧化氮浓度经常超过欧盟规定的 40 μg/m3 的限值。这一限值很可能会向世界卫生组织建议的 10 μg/m3 目标靠拢。在此背景下,该市于 2023 年 2 月在现有低排放区内实施了有选择性的柴油车禁令,主要针对欧 4 及更旧的柴油车。我们的研究调查了慕尼黑选择性柴油车禁令对二氧化氮浓度的影响,重点关注禁令实施后的半年时间。这些准实验方法创造了一种 "反事实 "的无干预情景,通过比较观察到的情景和反事实情景来估计干预效果。我们采用了历史对照,使用了低排放区内外多个监测站在 2014 年至 2022 年期间的常规数据,并考虑了可能的混杂因素。选择性柴油车禁令的影响较小,较宽的置信区间表明影响的大小和方向存在很大的不确定性。在 Landshuter Allee,平均干预效果为-2.67 μg/m3(95 %-CI = [-12.72; 7.38]);在 Stachus,平均干预效果为-2.74 μg/m3(95 %-CI = [-9.91; 4.42]);在 Lothstrasse,平均干预效果为-1.03 μg/m3(95 %-CI = [-7.75; 5.69])。我们的研究表明,慕尼黑的选择性柴油车禁令对降低二氧化氮浓度的效果有限。可能的原因包括:禁令的重点是欧 4 和更老的柴油车、选择性禁令有许多豁免以及执行不力。这突出表明,全面的方法以及持续、精心设计的监测和评估对于解决城市空气污染和保护公众健康至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Munich’s selective diesel vehicle ban and its impact on nitrogen dioxide concentrations: A quasi-experimental study

Background

The current limit on NO2 concentrations of 40 μg/m3, set by the European Union, has been regularly exceeded in Munich, Germany. This limit will likely be reduced towards the WHO recommended target of 10 μg/m3. Against this backdrop, the city implemented a selective diesel vehicle ban within the existing low-emission zone in February 2023, targeting Euro 4 and older diesel vehicles. Our study investigated the effect of Munich’s selective diesel vehicle ban on NO2 concentrations, focusing on the half-year period following its implementation.

Methods

Our study utilized a synthetic control approach (primary analysis) and a controlled interrupted time series approach (secondary analysis). These quasi-experimental methodologies create a ‘counterfactual’ no-intervention scenario, enabling comparison between observed and counterfactual scenarios to estimate an intervention effect. We employed historical controls, using routine data from multiple monitoring stations located within and outside the low-emission zone for 2014 to 2022, and considered possible confounders.

Results

NO2 concentrations within Munich’s low-emission zone showed overall declining trends from August 2014 to July 2023. Effects of the selective diesel vehicle ban were small and wide confidence intervals indicate large uncertainty in the magnitude and direction of the effect. At Landshuter Allee, the average intervention effect was −2.67 μg/m3 (95 %-CI = [-12.72; 7.38]), at Stachus it was −2.74 μg/m3 (95 %-CI = [-9.91; 4.42]), and at Lothstrasse it was −1.03 μg/m3 (95 %-CI = [-7.75; 5.69]). The secondary analysis confirmed these findings, reinforcing uncertainty about the effect of the intervention.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that Munich’s selective diesel vehicle ban had a limited effect on lowering NO2 concentrations. Possible explanations include the ban’s focus on Euro 4 and older diesel vehicles, many exemptions to the selective ban, and unclear enforcement. This highlights that comprehensive approaches and ongoing, well-designed monitoring and evaluation are crucial for addressing urban air pollution and protecting public health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environment International
Environment International 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
734
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health publishes manuscripts focusing on critical aspects of environmental and occupational medicine, including studies in toxicology and epidemiology, to illuminate the human health implications of exposure to environmental hazards. The journal adopts an open-access model and practices open peer review. It caters to scientists and practitioners across all environmental science domains, directly or indirectly impacting human health and well-being. With a commitment to enhancing the prevention of environmentally-related health risks, Environmental Health serves as a public health journal for the community and scientists engaged in matters of public health significance concerning the environment.
期刊最新文献
Network-based investigation of petroleum hydrocarbons-induced ecotoxicological effects and their risk assessment A comprehensive machine learning-based models for predicting mixture toxicity of azole fungicides toward algae (Auxenochlorella pyrenoidosa) Climate change policies reduce air pollution and increase physical activity: Benefits, costs, inequalities, and indoor exposures Effects of ambient temperature on mental and neurological conditions in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis Corrigendum to “SDHi fungicides: An example of mitotoxic pesticides targeting the succinate dehydrogenase complex” [Environ. Int. 180 (2023) 108219]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1