新兴全固态锂硫电池：未来二次电池的圣杯

IF 19.3 1区材料科学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL ACS Energy Letters Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1021/acsenergylett.4c02563

Yang-Kook Sun

{"title":"新兴全固态锂硫电池：未来二次电池的圣杯","authors":"Yang-Kook Sun","doi":"10.1021/acsenergylett.4c02563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Figure 1. Forecasted cell-level energy densities and costs of ASSLSBs compared to those of other battery types, such as LIBs and ASSBs. The energy density and cost of each battery type are plotted based on values reported in recent literature: LIBs (NCM), (20,21) LIBs (LiFePO<sub>4</sub> (LFP)), (21−23) and ASSBs. (24−26) The expected values of 1 and 2 for the cell energy densities of ASSLSBs were calculated assuming composite cathodes with respective S contents of 50 and 60 wt%, respective levels of S utilization of 80% and 90% (relative to their theoretical capacities), and cell potentials of 2.0 V. Additionally, it was assumed that the composite cathodes constituted 30 wt% of the total cell masses. This article references 36 other publications. This article has not yet been cited by other publications.","PeriodicalId":16,"journal":{"name":"ACS Energy Letters ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emerging All-Solid-State Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Holy Grails for Future Secondary Batteries\",\"authors\":\"Yang-Kook Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsenergylett.4c02563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Figure 1. Forecasted cell-level energy densities and costs of ASSLSBs compared to those of other battery types, such as LIBs and ASSBs. The energy density and cost of each battery type are plotted based on values reported in recent literature: LIBs (NCM), (20,21) LIBs (LiFePO<sub>4</sub> (LFP)), (21−23) and ASSBs. (24−26) The expected values of 1 and 2 for the cell energy densities of ASSLSBs were calculated assuming composite cathodes with respective S contents of 50 and 60 wt%, respective levels of S utilization of 80% and 90% (relative to their theoretical capacities), and cell potentials of 2.0 V. Additionally, it was assumed that the composite cathodes constituted 30 wt% of the total cell masses. This article references 36 other publications. This article has not yet been cited by other publications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Energy Letters \",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Energy Letters \",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.4c02563\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Energy Letters ","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.4c02563","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

图 1.与 LIB 和 ASSB 等其他类型电池相比，ASSLSB 的电池级能量密度和成本预测图。每种电池类型的能量密度和成本都是根据近期文献报道的数值绘制的：LIBs (NCM)、(20,21) LIBs (LiFePO4 (LFP))、(21-23) 和 ASSBs。(24-26）计算 ASSLSB 电池能量密度的预期值 1 和 2 时，假设复合阴极的 S 含量分别为 50 和 60 wt%，S 利用率分别为 80% 和 90%（相对于理论容量），电池电位为 2.0 V。此外，还假设复合阴极占电池总质量的 30%。本文引用了 36 篇其他出版物。本文尚未被其他出版物引用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Emerging All-Solid-State Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Holy Grails for Future Secondary Batteries

Figure 1. Forecasted cell-level energy densities and costs of ASSLSBs compared to those of other battery types, such as LIBs and ASSBs. The energy density and cost of each battery type are plotted based on values reported in recent literature: LIBs (NCM), (20,21) LIBs (LiFePO₄ (LFP)), (21−23) and ASSBs. (24−26) The expected values of 1 and 2 for the cell energy densities of ASSLSBs were calculated assuming composite cathodes with respective S contents of 50 and 60 wt%, respective levels of S utilization of 80% and 90% (relative to their theoretical capacities), and cell potentials of 2.0 V. Additionally, it was assumed that the composite cathodes constituted 30 wt% of the total cell masses. This article references 36 other publications. This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ACS Energy Letters Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

CiteScore

31.20

自引率

5.00%

发文量

469

审稿时长

1 months

期刊介绍： ACS Energy Letters is a monthly journal that publishes papers reporting new scientific advances in energy research. The journal focuses on topics that are of interest to scientists working in the fundamental and applied sciences. Rapid publication is a central criterion for acceptance, and the journal is known for its quick publication times, with an average of 4-6 weeks from submission to web publication in As Soon As Publishable format. ACS Energy Letters is ranked as the number one journal in the Web of Science Electrochemistry category. It also ranks within the top 10 journals for Physical Chemistry, Energy & Fuels, and Nanoscience & Nanotechnology. The journal offers several types of articles, including Letters, Energy Express, Perspectives, Reviews, Editorials, Viewpoints and Energy Focus. Additionally, authors have the option to submit videos that summarize or support the information presented in a Perspective or Review article, which can be highlighted on the journal's website. ACS Energy Letters is abstracted and indexed in Chemical Abstracts Service/SciFinder, EBSCO-summon, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Portico.