发育性和癫痫性脑病的神经调控策略。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110067
Debopam Samanta , Zulfi Haneef , Gregory W. Albert , Sunil Naik , Puck C. Reeders , Puneet Jain , Taylor J. Abel , Ruba Al-Ramadhani , George M. Ibrahim , Aaron E.L. Warren
{"title":"发育性和癫痫性脑病的神经调控策略。","authors":"Debopam Samanta ,&nbsp;Zulfi Haneef ,&nbsp;Gregory W. Albert ,&nbsp;Sunil Naik ,&nbsp;Puck C. Reeders ,&nbsp;Puneet Jain ,&nbsp;Taylor J. Abel ,&nbsp;Ruba Al-Ramadhani ,&nbsp;George M. Ibrahim ,&nbsp;Aaron E.L. Warren","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are a group of childhood-onset epilepsy syndromes characterized by frequent seizures, severe cognitive and behavioral impairments, and poor long-term outcomes. These conditions are typically refractory to currently available medical therapies, prompting recent exploration of neuromodulation treatments such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS), which aim to modulate epileptic networks spanning cortical and subcortical regions. These advances have occurred alongside an improved understanding of syndrome-specific and interictal epileptiform discharge/seizure-specific brain networks. By targeting key nodes within these networks, DBS and RNS hold promise for influencing seizures and associated cognitive and behavioral comorbidities. Initial experiences with centromedian (CM) thalamic DBS for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) have shown modest efficacy across multiple seizure types. Reports also indicate the application of DBS and RNS across various genetic and structural etiologies commonly associated with DEEs, with mixed success. Although DBS and RNS are increasingly used in LGS and other DEEs, their mixed efficacy highlights a knowledge gap in understanding why some patients with LGS do not respond and which neuromodulation approach is most effective for other DEEs. To address these issues, this review first discusses recent neuroimaging studies showing similarities and differences in the epileptic brain networks underlying various DEEs, revealing the common involvement of the thalamus and the default-mode network (DMN) across multiple DEEs. We then examine thalamic DBS for LGS to illustrate how such network insights may be used to optimize neuromodulation. Although network-based neuromodulation is still in its infancy, the LGS model may serve as a framework for other DEEs, where optimal treatment necessitates consideration of the underlying epileptic networks. Lastly, the review suggests future research directions, including individualized connectivity assessment and biomarker identification through collaborative efforts, which may enhance the therapeutic potential of neuromodulation for individuals living with DEEs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuromodulation strategies in developmental and epileptic encephalopathies\",\"authors\":\"Debopam Samanta ,&nbsp;Zulfi Haneef ,&nbsp;Gregory W. Albert ,&nbsp;Sunil Naik ,&nbsp;Puck C. Reeders ,&nbsp;Puneet Jain ,&nbsp;Taylor J. Abel ,&nbsp;Ruba Al-Ramadhani ,&nbsp;George M. Ibrahim ,&nbsp;Aaron E.L. Warren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are a group of childhood-onset epilepsy syndromes characterized by frequent seizures, severe cognitive and behavioral impairments, and poor long-term outcomes. These conditions are typically refractory to currently available medical therapies, prompting recent exploration of neuromodulation treatments such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS), which aim to modulate epileptic networks spanning cortical and subcortical regions. These advances have occurred alongside an improved understanding of syndrome-specific and interictal epileptiform discharge/seizure-specific brain networks. By targeting key nodes within these networks, DBS and RNS hold promise for influencing seizures and associated cognitive and behavioral comorbidities. Initial experiences with centromedian (CM) thalamic DBS for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) have shown modest efficacy across multiple seizure types. Reports also indicate the application of DBS and RNS across various genetic and structural etiologies commonly associated with DEEs, with mixed success. Although DBS and RNS are increasingly used in LGS and other DEEs, their mixed efficacy highlights a knowledge gap in understanding why some patients with LGS do not respond and which neuromodulation approach is most effective for other DEEs. To address these issues, this review first discusses recent neuroimaging studies showing similarities and differences in the epileptic brain networks underlying various DEEs, revealing the common involvement of the thalamus and the default-mode network (DMN) across multiple DEEs. We then examine thalamic DBS for LGS to illustrate how such network insights may be used to optimize neuromodulation. Although network-based neuromodulation is still in its infancy, the LGS model may serve as a framework for other DEEs, where optimal treatment necessitates consideration of the underlying epileptic networks. Lastly, the review suggests future research directions, including individualized connectivity assessment and biomarker identification through collaborative efforts, which may enhance the therapeutic potential of neuromodulation for individuals living with DEEs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505024004499\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505024004499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发育性癫痫性脑病(DEEs)是一组儿童期发病的癫痫综合征,其特点是癫痫频繁发作、严重的认知和行为障碍以及长期疗效不佳。这些病症通常对现有的药物疗法具有难治性,促使人们最近开始探索神经调控疗法,如脑深部刺激(DBS)和反应性神经刺激(RNS),其目的是调节跨越皮层和皮层下区域的癫痫网络。在取得这些进展的同时,人们对综合征特异性和发作间期癫痫样放电/癫痫特异性大脑网络的了解也在不断加深。通过靶向这些网络中的关键节点,DBS 和 RNS 有希望影响癫痫发作及相关的认知和行为合并症。丘脑中央定位脑电切除术(CM)治疗伦诺克斯-加斯豪特综合征(LGS)的初步经验显示,该疗法对多种癫痫发作类型均有一定疗效。报告还显示,DBS 和 RNS 可应用于与 DEEs 常见的各种遗传和结构病因,但疗效参差不齐。虽然 DBS 和 RNS 越来越多地用于 LGS 和其他 DEEs,但它们的疗效参差不齐,这凸显了在理解为什么一些 LGS 患者没有反应以及哪种神经调控方法对其他 DEEs 最有效方面存在知识空白。为了解决这些问题,本综述首先讨论了最近的神经影像学研究,这些研究显示了各种 DEEs 的基础癫痫脑网络的异同,揭示了丘脑和默认模式网络 (DMN) 在多种 DEEs 中的共同参与。然后,我们研究了丘脑 DBS 治疗 LGS 的情况,以说明如何利用这种网络洞察力来优化神经调控。尽管基于网络的神经调控仍处于起步阶段,但 LGS 模型可作为其他 DEE 的框架,在这些 DEE 中,优化治疗需要考虑潜在的癫痫网络。最后,综述提出了未来的研究方向,包括通过合作进行个体化连通性评估和生物标记物鉴定,这可能会提高神经调控对 DEEs 患者的治疗潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neuromodulation strategies in developmental and epileptic encephalopathies
Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are a group of childhood-onset epilepsy syndromes characterized by frequent seizures, severe cognitive and behavioral impairments, and poor long-term outcomes. These conditions are typically refractory to currently available medical therapies, prompting recent exploration of neuromodulation treatments such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS), which aim to modulate epileptic networks spanning cortical and subcortical regions. These advances have occurred alongside an improved understanding of syndrome-specific and interictal epileptiform discharge/seizure-specific brain networks. By targeting key nodes within these networks, DBS and RNS hold promise for influencing seizures and associated cognitive and behavioral comorbidities. Initial experiences with centromedian (CM) thalamic DBS for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) have shown modest efficacy across multiple seizure types. Reports also indicate the application of DBS and RNS across various genetic and structural etiologies commonly associated with DEEs, with mixed success. Although DBS and RNS are increasingly used in LGS and other DEEs, their mixed efficacy highlights a knowledge gap in understanding why some patients with LGS do not respond and which neuromodulation approach is most effective for other DEEs. To address these issues, this review first discusses recent neuroimaging studies showing similarities and differences in the epileptic brain networks underlying various DEEs, revealing the common involvement of the thalamus and the default-mode network (DMN) across multiple DEEs. We then examine thalamic DBS for LGS to illustrate how such network insights may be used to optimize neuromodulation. Although network-based neuromodulation is still in its infancy, the LGS model may serve as a framework for other DEEs, where optimal treatment necessitates consideration of the underlying epileptic networks. Lastly, the review suggests future research directions, including individualized connectivity assessment and biomarker identification through collaborative efforts, which may enhance the therapeutic potential of neuromodulation for individuals living with DEEs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1