利用每周和每月的健康数据进行与气温相关的无偏见死亡率估算:一种用于环境流行病学和气候影响研究的新方法。

IF 24.1 1区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Lancet Planetary Health Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00212-2
Prof Xavier Basagaña PhD , Joan Ballester PhD
{"title":"利用每周和每月的健康数据进行与气温相关的无偏见死亡率估算:一种用于环境流行病学和气候影响研究的新方法。","authors":"Prof Xavier Basagaña PhD ,&nbsp;Joan Ballester PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00212-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Exposure to environmental factors has a high burden on human health, with millions of premature annual deaths associated with the short-term health effects of ambient temperatures and air pollution. However, direct estimations of exposure-related mortality from real data are still not available in most parts of the world, especially in low-resource settings, due to the unavailability of daily health records to calibrate epidemiological models.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this study, we have filled the crucial gap in available direct estimations by developing a method to make valid inference for the relationship between exposure and response data that uses only exposure and temporally aggregated response data. We provided the mathematical derivation of the method, and compared the results by using simulations applied to daily temperature and daily, weekly, and monthly mortality data. The method was then applied to the newly created database of the EARLY-ADAPT project.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The daily and weekly models produced similar and unbiased estimates of the temperature-related relative risks and attributable mortality, with only slightly more imprecision in the weekly model. Even the estimates of the monthly model were unbiased when using enough data, although at the expense of a substantial increase in variability. The real data analysis showed that the similarity between the regional values of two aggregation models increased with the number of years and regions of the dataset, and decreased with the difference in their degree of temporal aggregation.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Our method opens the door to conducting epidemiological studies in low-resource settings, where access to daily health data is not possible. Moreover, it allows accurate estimation of the short-term health effects of environmental exposures in near-real time, when daily health data are still not available, such as in the estimation of the mortality burden of recent record-breaking heat episodes. Overall, our method represents an important new approach to how the public health community can use data to create new evidence for research, translation and policy making.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>European Research Council (ERC).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48548,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Planetary Health","volume":"8 10","pages":"Pages e766-e777"},"PeriodicalIF":24.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unbiased temperature-related mortality estimates using weekly and monthly health data: a new method for environmental epidemiology and climate impact studies\",\"authors\":\"Prof Xavier Basagaña PhD ,&nbsp;Joan Ballester PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00212-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Exposure to environmental factors has a high burden on human health, with millions of premature annual deaths associated with the short-term health effects of ambient temperatures and air pollution. However, direct estimations of exposure-related mortality from real data are still not available in most parts of the world, especially in low-resource settings, due to the unavailability of daily health records to calibrate epidemiological models.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this study, we have filled the crucial gap in available direct estimations by developing a method to make valid inference for the relationship between exposure and response data that uses only exposure and temporally aggregated response data. We provided the mathematical derivation of the method, and compared the results by using simulations applied to daily temperature and daily, weekly, and monthly mortality data. The method was then applied to the newly created database of the EARLY-ADAPT project.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The daily and weekly models produced similar and unbiased estimates of the temperature-related relative risks and attributable mortality, with only slightly more imprecision in the weekly model. Even the estimates of the monthly model were unbiased when using enough data, although at the expense of a substantial increase in variability. The real data analysis showed that the similarity between the regional values of two aggregation models increased with the number of years and regions of the dataset, and decreased with the difference in their degree of temporal aggregation.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Our method opens the door to conducting epidemiological studies in low-resource settings, where access to daily health data is not possible. Moreover, it allows accurate estimation of the short-term health effects of environmental exposures in near-real time, when daily health data are still not available, such as in the estimation of the mortality burden of recent record-breaking heat episodes. Overall, our method represents an important new approach to how the public health community can use data to create new evidence for research, translation and policy making.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>European Research Council (ERC).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Planetary Health\",\"volume\":\"8 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages e766-e777\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":24.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Planetary Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542519624002122\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Planetary Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542519624002122","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:暴露于环境因素对人类健康造成了沉重负担,每年有数百万人因环境温度和空气污染的短期健康影响而过早死亡。然而,在世界大部分地区,特别是在资源匮乏的环境中,由于没有日常健康记录来校准流行病学模型,因此仍然无法从真实数据中直接估算与暴露相关的死亡率:在本研究中,我们开发了一种方法,仅使用暴露数据和按时间汇总的反应数据,就能有效推断暴露数据与反应数据之间的关系,从而填补了现有直接估算的重要空白。我们提供了该方法的数学推导,并通过对每日气温以及每日、每周和每月死亡率数据进行模拟,对结果进行了比较。然后将该方法应用于 EARLY-ADAPT 项目新建立的数据库:结果:日模型和周模型对与温度有关的相对风险和可归因死亡率的估计值相似且无偏见,只是周模型的不精确性稍高一些。在使用足够多的数据时,月度模型的估计值也是无偏差的,但代价是变异性大大增加。真实数据分析显示,两个聚合模型的地区值之间的相似性随着数据集的年数和地区数的增加而增加,随着时间聚合程度的不同而减少:我们的方法为在无法获取日常健康数据的低资源环境中开展流行病学研究打开了大门。此外,在仍无法获得日常健康数据的情况下,该方法还能准确估算环境暴露对健康的短期影响,例如在估算近期破纪录的高温天气造成的死亡负担时。总之,我们的方法是公共卫生界如何利用数据为研究、转化和政策制定提供新证据的重要新方法:欧洲研究理事会 (ERC)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unbiased temperature-related mortality estimates using weekly and monthly health data: a new method for environmental epidemiology and climate impact studies

Background

Exposure to environmental factors has a high burden on human health, with millions of premature annual deaths associated with the short-term health effects of ambient temperatures and air pollution. However, direct estimations of exposure-related mortality from real data are still not available in most parts of the world, especially in low-resource settings, due to the unavailability of daily health records to calibrate epidemiological models.

Methods

In this study, we have filled the crucial gap in available direct estimations by developing a method to make valid inference for the relationship between exposure and response data that uses only exposure and temporally aggregated response data. We provided the mathematical derivation of the method, and compared the results by using simulations applied to daily temperature and daily, weekly, and monthly mortality data. The method was then applied to the newly created database of the EARLY-ADAPT project.

Findings

The daily and weekly models produced similar and unbiased estimates of the temperature-related relative risks and attributable mortality, with only slightly more imprecision in the weekly model. Even the estimates of the monthly model were unbiased when using enough data, although at the expense of a substantial increase in variability. The real data analysis showed that the similarity between the regional values of two aggregation models increased with the number of years and regions of the dataset, and decreased with the difference in their degree of temporal aggregation.

Interpretation

Our method opens the door to conducting epidemiological studies in low-resource settings, where access to daily health data is not possible. Moreover, it allows accurate estimation of the short-term health effects of environmental exposures in near-real time, when daily health data are still not available, such as in the estimation of the mortality burden of recent record-breaking heat episodes. Overall, our method represents an important new approach to how the public health community can use data to create new evidence for research, translation and policy making.

Funding

European Research Council (ERC).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
28.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Planetary Health is a gold Open Access journal dedicated to investigating and addressing the multifaceted determinants of healthy human civilizations and their impact on natural systems. Positioned as a key player in sustainable development, the journal covers a broad, interdisciplinary scope, encompassing areas such as poverty, nutrition, gender equity, water and sanitation, energy, economic growth, industrialization, inequality, urbanization, human consumption and production, climate change, ocean health, land use, peace, and justice. With a commitment to publishing high-quality research, comment, and correspondence, it aims to be the leading journal for sustainable development in the face of unprecedented dangers and threats.
期刊最新文献
Planet-friendly school meals: opportunities to improve children's health and leverage change in food systems. Bridging the gender, climate, and health gap: the road to COP29. No silver bullets, no shortcuts: confronting the commercial determinants of the climate crisis. Correction to Lancet Planet Health 2024; published Oct 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00229-8. Climate injustice: lessons from the Philippines' jeepney modernisation programme
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1