生活质量支持模式对残疾学生融入高等教育的影响:范围综述。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Research in Developmental Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104850
{"title":"生活质量支持模式对残疾学生融入高等教育的影响:范围综述。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Quality of Life Supports Model (QOLSM) is a well-suited framework for enhancing the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education. No research aimed at assessing its impact has been identified.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This review aims to map the scientific literature to assess the current impact of QOLSM on higher education.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and procedures</h3><div>A Scoping Review of educational practices, policies, and cultures aimed at enhancing the quality of life for students with disabilities was conducted. Databases from EBSCOHost, ProQuest, and Scielo were employed to identify studies written in English or Spanish from 1978 to 2023. Four independent reviewers screened results for inclusion.</div></div><div><h3>Outcomes and results</h3><div>Out of 5361 records, 21 met the inclusion criteria. Students with developmental disabilities are the primary recipients of Quality-of-life support strategies. The reported educational practices were poorly aligned with the disability rights framework, the social-ecological model of disability, and the multidimensional Quality-of-Life construct. Specialized supports and mainstream settings were more common than generic supports and segregated settings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications</h3><div>This review highlights the currently limited impact of the QOLSM in fostering the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education. Conducting a systematic review or meta-analysis is not recommended at this stage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the Quality of Life Supports Model on the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Quality of Life Supports Model (QOLSM) is a well-suited framework for enhancing the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education. No research aimed at assessing its impact has been identified.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This review aims to map the scientific literature to assess the current impact of QOLSM on higher education.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and procedures</h3><div>A Scoping Review of educational practices, policies, and cultures aimed at enhancing the quality of life for students with disabilities was conducted. Databases from EBSCOHost, ProQuest, and Scielo were employed to identify studies written in English or Spanish from 1978 to 2023. Four independent reviewers screened results for inclusion.</div></div><div><h3>Outcomes and results</h3><div>Out of 5361 records, 21 met the inclusion criteria. Students with developmental disabilities are the primary recipients of Quality-of-life support strategies. The reported educational practices were poorly aligned with the disability rights framework, the social-ecological model of disability, and the multidimensional Quality-of-Life construct. Specialized supports and mainstream settings were more common than generic supports and segregated settings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications</h3><div>This review highlights the currently limited impact of the QOLSM in fostering the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education. Conducting a systematic review or meta-analysis is not recommended at this stage.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Developmental Disabilities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Developmental Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224001823\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224001823","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生活质量支持模式(QOLSM)是一个非常适合加强残疾学生融入高等教育的框架。目的:本综述旨在对科学文献进行梳理,以评估 QOLSM 目前对高等教育的影响:对旨在提高残疾学生生活质量的教育实践、政策和文化进行了范围界定。我们使用了 EBSCOHost、ProQuest 和 Scielo 数据库,以确定 1978 年至 2023 年期间用英语或西班牙语撰写的研究。四位独立审稿人对结果进行了筛选,以纳入研究:在 5361 条记录中,有 21 条符合纳入标准。发育障碍学生是生活质量支持策略的主要接受者。所报告的教育实践与残疾人权利框架、残疾的社会生态模式以及多维生活质量构建不甚一致。特殊支持和主流环境比一般支持和隔离环境更为常见:本综述强调了 "QOLSM "目前在促进残疾学生融入高等教育方面的有限影响。现阶段不建议进行系统回顾或荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of the Quality of Life Supports Model on the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education: A scoping review

Background

The Quality of Life Supports Model (QOLSM) is a well-suited framework for enhancing the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education. No research aimed at assessing its impact has been identified.

Aims

This review aims to map the scientific literature to assess the current impact of QOLSM on higher education.

Methods and procedures

A Scoping Review of educational practices, policies, and cultures aimed at enhancing the quality of life for students with disabilities was conducted. Databases from EBSCOHost, ProQuest, and Scielo were employed to identify studies written in English or Spanish from 1978 to 2023. Four independent reviewers screened results for inclusion.

Outcomes and results

Out of 5361 records, 21 met the inclusion criteria. Students with developmental disabilities are the primary recipients of Quality-of-life support strategies. The reported educational practices were poorly aligned with the disability rights framework, the social-ecological model of disability, and the multidimensional Quality-of-Life construct. Specialized supports and mainstream settings were more common than generic supports and segregated settings.

Conclusions and implications

This review highlights the currently limited impact of the QOLSM in fostering the inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education. Conducting a systematic review or meta-analysis is not recommended at this stage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
178
期刊介绍: Research In Developmental Disabilities is aimed at publishing original research of an interdisciplinary nature that has a direct bearing on the remediation of problems associated with developmental disabilities. Manuscripts will be solicited throughout the world. Articles will be primarily empirical studies, although an occasional position paper or review will be accepted. The aim of the journal will be to publish articles on all aspects of research with the developmentally disabled, with any methodologically sound approach being acceptable.
期刊最新文献
Being the other child - A systematic review on the quality of life and mental health of siblings of children with rare diseases SPAN-ASD: Pilot implementation to promote functional goals of autistic adolescents and young adults A systematic review of educational interventions to enhance cancer awareness and screening in individuals with intellectual disabilities: A mixed-methods approach Working memory training in students with dyslexia: Additional effects to reading and spelling remediation not likely The effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on information processing speed in children with intellectual disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1