将牛废水中培养的微藻作为生物肥料:芝麻菜(Eruca vesicaria)生产试验及其对可持续农业的益处

IF 3.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1007/s11270-024-07519-1
Laiza Santos Dagnaisser, David Vilas Boas de Campos, Érika Flávia Machado Pinheiro, Dione Galvão da Silva, Jéssica Chaves Cardoso, Conan Ayade Salvador, Elisa Helena da Rocha Ferreira, Henrique Vieira de Mendonça
{"title":"将牛废水中培养的微藻作为生物肥料:芝麻菜(Eruca vesicaria)生产试验及其对可持续农业的益处","authors":"Laiza Santos Dagnaisser,&nbsp;David Vilas Boas de Campos,&nbsp;Érika Flávia Machado Pinheiro,&nbsp;Dione Galvão da Silva,&nbsp;Jéssica Chaves Cardoso,&nbsp;Conan Ayade Salvador,&nbsp;Elisa Helena da Rocha Ferreira,&nbsp;Henrique Vieira de Mendonça","doi":"10.1007/s11270-024-07519-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ensuring food security for the world's growing population while advancing sustainable agriculture and reducing conventional fertilizer use is a major challenge. The objective of this research was to comparatively evaluate the effect of microalgae biomass biofertilizer, derived from the production of <i>Arthrospira platensis</i> DHR 20 (Spirulina) in cattle wastewater under organic management (CW), on the development of arugula. It also examined the microbiological attributes of arugula leaves and the changes in soil chemical properties and structural composition of the soil post-experiment. The experiment consisted of three treatments: T1 – control, with urea application; T2 – CW; T3 – microalgae biofertilizer. The experimental design was completely randomized with seven replications and four plants per plot. The main conclusion of this research is that microalgae biomass biofertilizer presents nutritional potential for arugula, particularly as a source of N (187.5 mg L<sup>−1</sup>) and K (92.9 mg L<sup>−1</sup>), and can replace conventional urea fertilizer as a nitrogen source in the cultivation of arugula, with similar plant development quality according to the Dickson Quality Index. According to the SAR, the microalgae biomass biofertilizer and CW do not present soil sodicity restrictions and show a low to moderate level of restriction for soil use in terms of salinity. The average biofixation rate of 0.22 CO<sub>2</sub> L<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup> obtained in the study suggests that <i>Spirulina</i> cultivation in CW is suitable for this greenhouse gas biofixation. Leaves from the three treatment groups yielded negative results for the presence of thermotolerant coliforms. Both microalgae biofertilizer and CW acted as soil conditioners, improving its structural quality when compared to soil fertilized with urea.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"235 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microalgae Cultivated in Cattle Wastewater as a Biofertilizer: Tests on the Production of Arugula (Eruca vesicaria) and the Benefits for Sustainable Agriculture\",\"authors\":\"Laiza Santos Dagnaisser,&nbsp;David Vilas Boas de Campos,&nbsp;Érika Flávia Machado Pinheiro,&nbsp;Dione Galvão da Silva,&nbsp;Jéssica Chaves Cardoso,&nbsp;Conan Ayade Salvador,&nbsp;Elisa Helena da Rocha Ferreira,&nbsp;Henrique Vieira de Mendonça\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11270-024-07519-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ensuring food security for the world's growing population while advancing sustainable agriculture and reducing conventional fertilizer use is a major challenge. The objective of this research was to comparatively evaluate the effect of microalgae biomass biofertilizer, derived from the production of <i>Arthrospira platensis</i> DHR 20 (Spirulina) in cattle wastewater under organic management (CW), on the development of arugula. It also examined the microbiological attributes of arugula leaves and the changes in soil chemical properties and structural composition of the soil post-experiment. The experiment consisted of three treatments: T1 – control, with urea application; T2 – CW; T3 – microalgae biofertilizer. The experimental design was completely randomized with seven replications and four plants per plot. The main conclusion of this research is that microalgae biomass biofertilizer presents nutritional potential for arugula, particularly as a source of N (187.5 mg L<sup>−1</sup>) and K (92.9 mg L<sup>−1</sup>), and can replace conventional urea fertilizer as a nitrogen source in the cultivation of arugula, with similar plant development quality according to the Dickson Quality Index. According to the SAR, the microalgae biomass biofertilizer and CW do not present soil sodicity restrictions and show a low to moderate level of restriction for soil use in terms of salinity. The average biofixation rate of 0.22 CO<sub>2</sub> L<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup> obtained in the study suggests that <i>Spirulina</i> cultivation in CW is suitable for this greenhouse gas biofixation. Leaves from the three treatment groups yielded negative results for the presence of thermotolerant coliforms. Both microalgae biofertilizer and CW acted as soil conditioners, improving its structural quality when compared to soil fertilized with urea.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"volume\":\"235 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-024-07519-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-024-07519-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在推进可持续农业和减少传统肥料使用量的同时,确保世界不断增长的人口的粮食安全是一项重大挑战。本研究的目的是比较评估微藻生物质生物肥料对芝麻菜生长的影响,微藻生物质生物肥料来自有机管理(CW)下牛废水中生产的螺旋藻(Arthrospira platensis DHR 20)。实验还考察了芝麻菜叶片的微生物属性以及实验后土壤化学属性和结构组成的变化。实验包括三个处理:T1 - 施用尿素的对照组;T2 - CW;T3 - 微藻生物肥。实验设计完全随机,每小区有七个重复和四株植物。这项研究的主要结论是,微藻生物质生物肥对芝麻菜具有营养潜力,特别是作为氮(187.5 毫克/升-1)和钾(92.9 毫克/升-1)的来源,可以替代传统尿素肥料作为芝麻菜栽培中的氮源,根据迪克森质量指数,植物生长质量相似。根据 SAR,微藻生物质生物肥和化武不存在土壤钠度限制,在盐度方面对土壤使用的限制程度为中低水平。研究获得的平均生物固定率为 0.22 CO2 L-1 d-1,这表明在化武中栽培螺旋藻适用于温室气体生物固定。三个处理组的叶片均未检出耐热大肠菌群。与施用尿素的土壤相比,微藻生物肥料和化武都起到了土壤改良剂的作用,改善了土壤的结构质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Microalgae Cultivated in Cattle Wastewater as a Biofertilizer: Tests on the Production of Arugula (Eruca vesicaria) and the Benefits for Sustainable Agriculture

Ensuring food security for the world's growing population while advancing sustainable agriculture and reducing conventional fertilizer use is a major challenge. The objective of this research was to comparatively evaluate the effect of microalgae biomass biofertilizer, derived from the production of Arthrospira platensis DHR 20 (Spirulina) in cattle wastewater under organic management (CW), on the development of arugula. It also examined the microbiological attributes of arugula leaves and the changes in soil chemical properties and structural composition of the soil post-experiment. The experiment consisted of three treatments: T1 – control, with urea application; T2 – CW; T3 – microalgae biofertilizer. The experimental design was completely randomized with seven replications and four plants per plot. The main conclusion of this research is that microalgae biomass biofertilizer presents nutritional potential for arugula, particularly as a source of N (187.5 mg L−1) and K (92.9 mg L−1), and can replace conventional urea fertilizer as a nitrogen source in the cultivation of arugula, with similar plant development quality according to the Dickson Quality Index. According to the SAR, the microalgae biomass biofertilizer and CW do not present soil sodicity restrictions and show a low to moderate level of restriction for soil use in terms of salinity. The average biofixation rate of 0.22 CO2 L−1 d−1 obtained in the study suggests that Spirulina cultivation in CW is suitable for this greenhouse gas biofixation. Leaves from the three treatment groups yielded negative results for the presence of thermotolerant coliforms. Both microalgae biofertilizer and CW acted as soil conditioners, improving its structural quality when compared to soil fertilized with urea.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
448
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments. Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Water Quality Assessment, Possible Pollution Source Identification from Anthropogenically Stressed River Yamuna, India using Hydrochemical, Water Quality Indices and Multivariate Statistics Analysis The Novel Study On Arsenic Contamination, Health Risk, and Approaches to Its Mitigation From Water Resource of a Developing Country: A potential review Preparation and Characterization of a Novel Ca-Fe-Si-S Composite for the Simultaneous Stabilization of Heavy Metals in Arsenic Slag Ecological Health Assessments, based on Chemical Pollution and the Multimetric Fish Model, in a Temperate Monsoon River and their Spatiotemporal Variability Enhanced Cyanide Oxidation to Cyanate via Photocatalytic Ozonation: Comparing Sol–Gel and Hydrothermal Synthesis of BiVO4 Catalysts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1