基于 ML-MCDM 的新型决策支持系统,用于评估日内瓦公共交通中的自动驾驶汽车集成方案

IF 10.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Artificial Intelligence Review Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1007/s10462-024-10917-w
Shervin Zakeri, Dimitri Konstantas, Shahryar Sorooshian, Prasenjit Chatterjee
{"title":"基于 ML-MCDM 的新型决策支持系统,用于评估日内瓦公共交通中的自动驾驶汽车集成方案","authors":"Shervin Zakeri,&nbsp;Dimitri Konstantas,&nbsp;Shahryar Sorooshian,&nbsp;Prasenjit Chatterjee","doi":"10.1007/s10462-024-10917-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper proposes a novel decision-support system (DSS) to assist decision-makers in the ULTIMO project with integrating Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) in Geneva, Switzerland. Specifically, it aids in selecting the best scenario for incorporating AVs into Geneva’s public transportation system. The proposed DSS is architected on a combined integrated framework that includes a machine learning (ML) algorithm, random forest (RF) algorithm, and three novel multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) algorithms: (1) Modified E-ARWEN (ME-ARWEN) for selecting the best scenario with high sensitivity; (2) Compromiser—Positive, Neutral, Negative (Compromiser-PNN) for extracting weights from stakeholders, considering their preferences and potential conflicts; and (3) Collective Weight Processor (CWP) for deriving weights from expert opinions. Besides the main objective, this article also aims to: (1) Address the gap in practical DSS software within AV-related studies by providing Python codes of the DSS; (2) Develop a highly sensitive and comprehensive MCDM framework to address the project’s needs; and (3) Employ Artificial Intelligence within the DSS to optimize outputs. By the application of the proposed DSS, four scenarios were evaluated: (1) Full integration of AVs; (2) Partial integration; (3) Pilot project in limited areas; and (4) Delayed integration. The analysis identified partial integration as the best scenario for integrating AVs. Furthermore, comprehensive analyses conducted to validate the DSS outputs demonstrated the reliability of the results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"57 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-024-10917-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel ML-MCDM-based decision support system for evaluating autonomous vehicle integration scenarios in Geneva’s public transportation\",\"authors\":\"Shervin Zakeri,&nbsp;Dimitri Konstantas,&nbsp;Shahryar Sorooshian,&nbsp;Prasenjit Chatterjee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10462-024-10917-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper proposes a novel decision-support system (DSS) to assist decision-makers in the ULTIMO project with integrating Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) in Geneva, Switzerland. Specifically, it aids in selecting the best scenario for incorporating AVs into Geneva’s public transportation system. The proposed DSS is architected on a combined integrated framework that includes a machine learning (ML) algorithm, random forest (RF) algorithm, and three novel multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) algorithms: (1) Modified E-ARWEN (ME-ARWEN) for selecting the best scenario with high sensitivity; (2) Compromiser—Positive, Neutral, Negative (Compromiser-PNN) for extracting weights from stakeholders, considering their preferences and potential conflicts; and (3) Collective Weight Processor (CWP) for deriving weights from expert opinions. Besides the main objective, this article also aims to: (1) Address the gap in practical DSS software within AV-related studies by providing Python codes of the DSS; (2) Develop a highly sensitive and comprehensive MCDM framework to address the project’s needs; and (3) Employ Artificial Intelligence within the DSS to optimize outputs. By the application of the proposed DSS, four scenarios were evaluated: (1) Full integration of AVs; (2) Partial integration; (3) Pilot project in limited areas; and (4) Delayed integration. The analysis identified partial integration as the best scenario for integrating AVs. Furthermore, comprehensive analyses conducted to validate the DSS outputs demonstrated the reliability of the results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence Review\",\"volume\":\"57 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-024-10917-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-024-10917-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-024-10917-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一种新颖的决策支持系统(DSS),以协助决策者在瑞士日内瓦的 ULTIMO 项目中整合自动驾驶汽车(AVs)。具体而言,该系统有助于选择将自动驾驶汽车纳入日内瓦公共交通系统的最佳方案。拟议的 DSS 架构在一个综合集成框架上,其中包括机器学习(ML)算法、随机森林(RF)算法和三种新型多标准决策(MCDM)算法:(1) 修改后的 E-ARWEN 算法(ME-ARWEN),用于选择具有高灵敏度的最佳方案;(2) 妥协者-积极、中立、消极算法(Compromiser-PNN),用于从利益相关者中提取权重,同时考虑他们的偏好和潜在冲突;以及 (3) 集体权重处理器(CWP),用于从专家意见中提取权重。除主要目标外,本文还旨在:(1)通过提供 DSS 的 Python 代码,填补 AV 相关研究中实用 DSS 软件的空白;(2)开发高灵敏度和全面的 MCDM 框架,以满足项目需求;以及(3)在 DSS 中使用人工智能来优化输出。通过应用拟议的 DSS,评估了四种方案:(1) 完全集成 AV;(2) 部分集成;(3) 在有限区域开展试点项目;(4) 推迟集成。分析结果表明,部分整合是整合自动驾驶汽车的最佳方案。此外,为验证 DSS 输出结果而进行的综合分析表明了结果的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel ML-MCDM-based decision support system for evaluating autonomous vehicle integration scenarios in Geneva’s public transportation

This paper proposes a novel decision-support system (DSS) to assist decision-makers in the ULTIMO project with integrating Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) in Geneva, Switzerland. Specifically, it aids in selecting the best scenario for incorporating AVs into Geneva’s public transportation system. The proposed DSS is architected on a combined integrated framework that includes a machine learning (ML) algorithm, random forest (RF) algorithm, and three novel multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) algorithms: (1) Modified E-ARWEN (ME-ARWEN) for selecting the best scenario with high sensitivity; (2) Compromiser—Positive, Neutral, Negative (Compromiser-PNN) for extracting weights from stakeholders, considering their preferences and potential conflicts; and (3) Collective Weight Processor (CWP) for deriving weights from expert opinions. Besides the main objective, this article also aims to: (1) Address the gap in practical DSS software within AV-related studies by providing Python codes of the DSS; (2) Develop a highly sensitive and comprehensive MCDM framework to address the project’s needs; and (3) Employ Artificial Intelligence within the DSS to optimize outputs. By the application of the proposed DSS, four scenarios were evaluated: (1) Full integration of AVs; (2) Partial integration; (3) Pilot project in limited areas; and (4) Delayed integration. The analysis identified partial integration as the best scenario for integrating AVs. Furthermore, comprehensive analyses conducted to validate the DSS outputs demonstrated the reliability of the results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing keratoconus detection with transformer technology and multi-source integration Federated learning design and functional models: survey A systematic literature review of recent advances on context-aware recommender systems Escape: an optimization method based on crowd evacuation behaviors A multi-strategy boosted bald eagle search algorithm for global optimization and constrained engineering problems: case study on MLP classification problems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1