肾上腺素能调节中性粒细胞和巨噬细胞的功能:病理生理学线索

IF 2.5 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY Current Opinion in Physiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cophys.2024.100780
Carmen Vida , Yadileiny Portilla , Cristina Murga
{"title":"肾上腺素能调节中性粒细胞和巨噬细胞的功能:病理生理学线索","authors":"Carmen Vida ,&nbsp;Yadileiny Portilla ,&nbsp;Cristina Murga","doi":"10.1016/j.cophys.2024.100780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this review, we will summarize current and past findings on the adrenergic regulation of myeloid cell functions and dynamics, with special emphasis on the pathophysiological impact of such modulation. Adrenergic signaling has traditionally been described to be immunosuppressive, but some recent results are challenging this paradigm, in particular those related to <em>in vivo</em> models of stress and findings in human patients. Also, cumulative evidence reveals that the final pro- or anti-inflammatory outcome of adrenergic inputs in myeloid cells appears to be very dependent on the experimental setup utilized or on the cellular context (resting vs stimulated conditions, <em>in vivo</em> vs <em>in vitro</em> settings, mice vs human cells, health vs pathology). Varying doses and/or time points may result in seemingly contradictory results that depend on the nature of receptor engaged (α or β adrenergic receptor subtypes), the downstream cascades involved, the presence of additional stimulatory or inhibitory signals, and the actual kinetics of the process studied. We will thus address some of these apparently paradoxical findings, review several pathological settings in which adrenergic modulation of neutrophil or macrophage-mediated immunity is relevant, and discuss open questions that still remain unanswered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52156,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Physiology","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100780"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adrenergic modulation of neutrophil and macrophage functions: pathophysiological cues\",\"authors\":\"Carmen Vida ,&nbsp;Yadileiny Portilla ,&nbsp;Cristina Murga\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cophys.2024.100780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this review, we will summarize current and past findings on the adrenergic regulation of myeloid cell functions and dynamics, with special emphasis on the pathophysiological impact of such modulation. Adrenergic signaling has traditionally been described to be immunosuppressive, but some recent results are challenging this paradigm, in particular those related to <em>in vivo</em> models of stress and findings in human patients. Also, cumulative evidence reveals that the final pro- or anti-inflammatory outcome of adrenergic inputs in myeloid cells appears to be very dependent on the experimental setup utilized or on the cellular context (resting vs stimulated conditions, <em>in vivo</em> vs <em>in vitro</em> settings, mice vs human cells, health vs pathology). Varying doses and/or time points may result in seemingly contradictory results that depend on the nature of receptor engaged (α or β adrenergic receptor subtypes), the downstream cascades involved, the presence of additional stimulatory or inhibitory signals, and the actual kinetics of the process studied. We will thus address some of these apparently paradoxical findings, review several pathological settings in which adrenergic modulation of neutrophil or macrophage-mediated immunity is relevant, and discuss open questions that still remain unanswered.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Physiology\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100780\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468867324000464\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468867324000464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇综述中,我们将总结目前和过去有关肾上腺素能调节髓系细胞功能和动态的研究结果,并特别强调这种调节对病理生理的影响。肾上腺素能信号传导历来被描述为具有免疫抑制作用,但最近的一些研究结果正在挑战这一范式,特别是那些与体内压力模型和人类患者研究结果相关的研究。此外,累积的证据显示,肾上腺素能输入骨髓细胞的最终促炎或抗炎结果似乎在很大程度上取决于所使用的实验装置或细胞环境(静息条件与刺激条件、体内环境与体外环境、小鼠细胞与人类细胞、健康与病理)。不同的剂量和/或时间点可能会导致看似矛盾的结果,这取决于受体的性质(α 或 β 肾上腺素能受体亚型)、所涉及的下游级联、是否存在额外的刺激或抑制信号以及所研究过程的实际动力学。因此,我们将讨论其中一些明显自相矛盾的发现,回顾肾上腺素能调节中性粒细胞或巨噬细胞介导的免疫相关的几种病理情况,并讨论仍未解答的开放性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adrenergic modulation of neutrophil and macrophage functions: pathophysiological cues
In this review, we will summarize current and past findings on the adrenergic regulation of myeloid cell functions and dynamics, with special emphasis on the pathophysiological impact of such modulation. Adrenergic signaling has traditionally been described to be immunosuppressive, but some recent results are challenging this paradigm, in particular those related to in vivo models of stress and findings in human patients. Also, cumulative evidence reveals that the final pro- or anti-inflammatory outcome of adrenergic inputs in myeloid cells appears to be very dependent on the experimental setup utilized or on the cellular context (resting vs stimulated conditions, in vivo vs in vitro settings, mice vs human cells, health vs pathology). Varying doses and/or time points may result in seemingly contradictory results that depend on the nature of receptor engaged (α or β adrenergic receptor subtypes), the downstream cascades involved, the presence of additional stimulatory or inhibitory signals, and the actual kinetics of the process studied. We will thus address some of these apparently paradoxical findings, review several pathological settings in which adrenergic modulation of neutrophil or macrophage-mediated immunity is relevant, and discuss open questions that still remain unanswered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Physiology
Current Opinion in Physiology Medicine-Physiology (medical)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
Publisher's Note Editorial Board Editorial Board Publisher's Note Adrenergic modulation of neutrophil and macrophage functions: pathophysiological cues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1