交易平台中的权力动态:依赖平台的企业家的适应战略

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Technovation Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103114
Kisito F. Nzembayie , Natasha Evers , David Urbano
{"title":"交易平台中的权力动态:依赖平台的企业家的适应战略","authors":"Kisito F. Nzembayie ,&nbsp;Natasha Evers ,&nbsp;David Urbano","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the adaptive strategies of platform-dependent entrepreneurs (PDEs) to mitigate venture survival risks associated with power asymmetries on transaction platforms. Using an embedded single case study design, we explore the decade-long survival of a PDE's firm in EdTech, focusing on its relationship with two dominant platforms, Google Search and AdSense. Our findings culminate in a robust framework that elucidates the strategic responses of PDEs to the challenges of power imbalance and its exercise through platform governance. Critically, the study reveals that PDEs assert their self-determination in a two-step process that is best observed over time. Strategic subjectification, followed by multihoming and diversification, can be observed over a long temporal duration, emerging as crucial mechanisms for managing dependency risks. This study contributes to the platform strategy literature by shifting the focus from owners to participants, simultaneously illuminating entrepreneurial resilience amid power-related uncertainties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 103114"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power dynamics in transaction platforms: Adaptive strategies of platform-dependent entrepreneurs\",\"authors\":\"Kisito F. Nzembayie ,&nbsp;Natasha Evers ,&nbsp;David Urbano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the adaptive strategies of platform-dependent entrepreneurs (PDEs) to mitigate venture survival risks associated with power asymmetries on transaction platforms. Using an embedded single case study design, we explore the decade-long survival of a PDE's firm in EdTech, focusing on its relationship with two dominant platforms, Google Search and AdSense. Our findings culminate in a robust framework that elucidates the strategic responses of PDEs to the challenges of power imbalance and its exercise through platform governance. Critically, the study reveals that PDEs assert their self-determination in a two-step process that is best observed over time. Strategic subjectification, followed by multihoming and diversification, can be observed over a long temporal duration, emerging as crucial mechanisms for managing dependency risks. This study contributes to the platform strategy literature by shifting the focus from owners to participants, simultaneously illuminating entrepreneurial resilience amid power-related uncertainties.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technovation\",\"volume\":\"138 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224001640\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224001640","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了依赖平台的创业者(PDEs)为降低与交易平台上权力不对称相关的风险企业生存风险而采取的适应性策略。通过嵌入式单一案例研究设计,我们探讨了教育科技领域一家 PDE 公司长达十年的生存状况,重点关注其与谷歌搜索和 AdSense 这两个主导平台的关系。我们的研究结果最终形成了一个稳健的框架,阐明了 PDE 应对权力不平衡挑战的战略对策,以及通过平台管理实现权力不平衡的方法。重要的是,这项研究揭示了 PDE 在一个两步过程中坚持其自决权,这个过程随着时间的推移得到了最好的观察。战略主体化以及随后的多重归属和多样化可以在很长一段时间内观察到,成为管理依赖风险的关键机制。本研究将焦点从所有者转向参与者,同时阐明了企业在与权力相关的不确定性中的应变能力,从而为平台战略文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Power dynamics in transaction platforms: Adaptive strategies of platform-dependent entrepreneurs
This study investigates the adaptive strategies of platform-dependent entrepreneurs (PDEs) to mitigate venture survival risks associated with power asymmetries on transaction platforms. Using an embedded single case study design, we explore the decade-long survival of a PDE's firm in EdTech, focusing on its relationship with two dominant platforms, Google Search and AdSense. Our findings culminate in a robust framework that elucidates the strategic responses of PDEs to the challenges of power imbalance and its exercise through platform governance. Critically, the study reveals that PDEs assert their self-determination in a two-step process that is best observed over time. Strategic subjectification, followed by multihoming and diversification, can be observed over a long temporal duration, emerging as crucial mechanisms for managing dependency risks. This study contributes to the platform strategy literature by shifting the focus from owners to participants, simultaneously illuminating entrepreneurial resilience amid power-related uncertainties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
期刊最新文献
Capturing the breadth of value creation with science fiction storytelling: Evidence from smart service design workshops A classification framework for generative artificial intelligence for social good Digital technology and innovation:The impact of blockchain application on enterprise innovation Exploring and investigating the complementarity and multidimensionality of innovation for sustainability research: Past present and future Facilitator or figurehead? The impact of academician shareholder on corporate innovation: Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1