利用双闪烁体和基于 ML 的展开增强贝塔光谱测定法

IF 2.8 3区 物理与天体物理 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Radiation Physics and Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112248
Yanfeng Xie , Soo Hyun Byun
{"title":"利用双闪烁体和基于 ML 的展开增强贝塔光谱测定法","authors":"Yanfeng Xie ,&nbsp;Soo Hyun Byun","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We present a novel beta spectrometer that consists of two identical plastic scintillators with one scintillator screened by a thin copper plate as a beta shield. The screened scintillator responds only to gamma photons while the other scintillator responds to both beta particles and gamma photons. The spectrometer’s response to beta and gamma radiations was characterized by experiments and Monte Carlo simulations. The gamma responses of the scintillators were in good agreement in most energy region while the screened scintillator showed a notable gamma attenuation in the low energy region below 150 keV. Comparison of the simulated and measured pulse height spectra showed good agreements for both beta and gamma radiations. For beta spectrum analysis, a simple gamma subtraction method and a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based method were investigated for various mixed beta–gamma fields. The subtraction method showed good accuracy in most energy regions while a notable overestimation of beta fluence was observed in the low energy region, which was caused by the gamma attenuation effect of the screened scintillator. The outcomes of the CNN method showed good agreements with the true beta fluence spectra for the validation dataset, however, the CNN model led to a significant overestimation for a dataset produced using the radionuclides that have not been used in the training datasets. To take the advantages of the outperforming features of both unfolding methods, a hybrid algorithm was deduced by applying a tolerance range to the subtraction result.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 112248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancement of beta spectrometry using double scintillators and ML-based unfolding\",\"authors\":\"Yanfeng Xie ,&nbsp;Soo Hyun Byun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We present a novel beta spectrometer that consists of two identical plastic scintillators with one scintillator screened by a thin copper plate as a beta shield. The screened scintillator responds only to gamma photons while the other scintillator responds to both beta particles and gamma photons. The spectrometer’s response to beta and gamma radiations was characterized by experiments and Monte Carlo simulations. The gamma responses of the scintillators were in good agreement in most energy region while the screened scintillator showed a notable gamma attenuation in the low energy region below 150 keV. Comparison of the simulated and measured pulse height spectra showed good agreements for both beta and gamma radiations. For beta spectrum analysis, a simple gamma subtraction method and a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based method were investigated for various mixed beta–gamma fields. The subtraction method showed good accuracy in most energy regions while a notable overestimation of beta fluence was observed in the low energy region, which was caused by the gamma attenuation effect of the screened scintillator. The outcomes of the CNN method showed good agreements with the true beta fluence spectra for the validation dataset, however, the CNN model led to a significant overestimation for a dataset produced using the radionuclides that have not been used in the training datasets. To take the advantages of the outperforming features of both unfolding methods, a hybrid algorithm was deduced by applying a tolerance range to the subtraction result.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Physics and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Physics and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X24007400\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X24007400","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们展示了一种新型的贝塔光谱仪,它由两个相同的塑料闪烁体组成,其中一个闪烁体被一块薄铜板屏蔽,作为贝塔屏蔽。被屏蔽的闪烁体只对伽马光子有反应,而另一个闪烁体则对β粒子和伽马光子都有反应。通过实验和蒙特卡罗模拟,确定了光谱仪对 β 和 γ 辐射的响应特性。闪烁体的伽马射线响应在大多数能量区域都很一致,而屏蔽闪烁体则在 150 千伏以下的低能量区域表现出明显的伽马射线衰减。对模拟和测量的脉冲高度谱进行比较后发现,二者在贝塔射线和伽马射线方面的响应都很一致。在β频谱分析方面,针对各种β-γ混合场,研究了一种简单的γ减法和一种基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的方法。减法在大多数能量区域都显示出良好的准确性,而在低能量区域则观察到明显的高估β通量,这是由于屏蔽闪烁体的伽马衰减效应造成的。对于验证数据集,CNN 方法的结果显示与真实的贝塔通量光谱有很好的一致性,但是,对于使用未在训练数据集中使用的放射性核素生成的数据集,CNN 模型导致了显著的高估。为了利用这两种展开方法的优势特征,通过对减法结果应用容差范围,推导出了一种混合算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancement of beta spectrometry using double scintillators and ML-based unfolding
We present a novel beta spectrometer that consists of two identical plastic scintillators with one scintillator screened by a thin copper plate as a beta shield. The screened scintillator responds only to gamma photons while the other scintillator responds to both beta particles and gamma photons. The spectrometer’s response to beta and gamma radiations was characterized by experiments and Monte Carlo simulations. The gamma responses of the scintillators were in good agreement in most energy region while the screened scintillator showed a notable gamma attenuation in the low energy region below 150 keV. Comparison of the simulated and measured pulse height spectra showed good agreements for both beta and gamma radiations. For beta spectrum analysis, a simple gamma subtraction method and a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based method were investigated for various mixed beta–gamma fields. The subtraction method showed good accuracy in most energy regions while a notable overestimation of beta fluence was observed in the low energy region, which was caused by the gamma attenuation effect of the screened scintillator. The outcomes of the CNN method showed good agreements with the true beta fluence spectra for the validation dataset, however, the CNN model led to a significant overestimation for a dataset produced using the radionuclides that have not been used in the training datasets. To take the advantages of the outperforming features of both unfolding methods, a hybrid algorithm was deduced by applying a tolerance range to the subtraction result.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Physics and Chemistry
Radiation Physics and Chemistry 化学-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
17.20%
发文量
574
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing. The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.
期刊最新文献
Effective natural rubber vulcanization using electron beam irradiation and DFT driven cross-linking agents Origins of Gamma-induced darkening of BaSO4 Simulation of peak properties in thermoluminescence dosimeters with the potential stimulation of all electron traps Screening the effect of ionizing radiation on microbiological quality, sensory acceptability and shelf life extension of lean fish fillets Simulation of displacement damage in Si & SiO2 caused by protons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1