{"title":"利用双闪烁体和基于 ML 的展开增强贝塔光谱测定法","authors":"Yanfeng Xie , Soo Hyun Byun","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We present a novel beta spectrometer that consists of two identical plastic scintillators with one scintillator screened by a thin copper plate as a beta shield. The screened scintillator responds only to gamma photons while the other scintillator responds to both beta particles and gamma photons. The spectrometer’s response to beta and gamma radiations was characterized by experiments and Monte Carlo simulations. The gamma responses of the scintillators were in good agreement in most energy region while the screened scintillator showed a notable gamma attenuation in the low energy region below 150 keV. Comparison of the simulated and measured pulse height spectra showed good agreements for both beta and gamma radiations. For beta spectrum analysis, a simple gamma subtraction method and a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based method were investigated for various mixed beta–gamma fields. The subtraction method showed good accuracy in most energy regions while a notable overestimation of beta fluence was observed in the low energy region, which was caused by the gamma attenuation effect of the screened scintillator. The outcomes of the CNN method showed good agreements with the true beta fluence spectra for the validation dataset, however, the CNN model led to a significant overestimation for a dataset produced using the radionuclides that have not been used in the training datasets. To take the advantages of the outperforming features of both unfolding methods, a hybrid algorithm was deduced by applying a tolerance range to the subtraction result.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 112248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancement of beta spectrometry using double scintillators and ML-based unfolding\",\"authors\":\"Yanfeng Xie , Soo Hyun Byun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We present a novel beta spectrometer that consists of two identical plastic scintillators with one scintillator screened by a thin copper plate as a beta shield. The screened scintillator responds only to gamma photons while the other scintillator responds to both beta particles and gamma photons. The spectrometer’s response to beta and gamma radiations was characterized by experiments and Monte Carlo simulations. The gamma responses of the scintillators were in good agreement in most energy region while the screened scintillator showed a notable gamma attenuation in the low energy region below 150 keV. Comparison of the simulated and measured pulse height spectra showed good agreements for both beta and gamma radiations. For beta spectrum analysis, a simple gamma subtraction method and a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based method were investigated for various mixed beta–gamma fields. The subtraction method showed good accuracy in most energy regions while a notable overestimation of beta fluence was observed in the low energy region, which was caused by the gamma attenuation effect of the screened scintillator. The outcomes of the CNN method showed good agreements with the true beta fluence spectra for the validation dataset, however, the CNN model led to a significant overestimation for a dataset produced using the radionuclides that have not been used in the training datasets. To take the advantages of the outperforming features of both unfolding methods, a hybrid algorithm was deduced by applying a tolerance range to the subtraction result.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Physics and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Physics and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X24007400\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X24007400","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhancement of beta spectrometry using double scintillators and ML-based unfolding
We present a novel beta spectrometer that consists of two identical plastic scintillators with one scintillator screened by a thin copper plate as a beta shield. The screened scintillator responds only to gamma photons while the other scintillator responds to both beta particles and gamma photons. The spectrometer’s response to beta and gamma radiations was characterized by experiments and Monte Carlo simulations. The gamma responses of the scintillators were in good agreement in most energy region while the screened scintillator showed a notable gamma attenuation in the low energy region below 150 keV. Comparison of the simulated and measured pulse height spectra showed good agreements for both beta and gamma radiations. For beta spectrum analysis, a simple gamma subtraction method and a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based method were investigated for various mixed beta–gamma fields. The subtraction method showed good accuracy in most energy regions while a notable overestimation of beta fluence was observed in the low energy region, which was caused by the gamma attenuation effect of the screened scintillator. The outcomes of the CNN method showed good agreements with the true beta fluence spectra for the validation dataset, however, the CNN model led to a significant overestimation for a dataset produced using the radionuclides that have not been used in the training datasets. To take the advantages of the outperforming features of both unfolding methods, a hybrid algorithm was deduced by applying a tolerance range to the subtraction result.
期刊介绍:
Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing.
The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.