{"title":"揭示中国最低生活保障对家庭交通支出的因果效应:因果森林分析","authors":"Zheng Wu , Yihua Zhang , Mingyu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.09.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate the causal effects of China’s Minimum Living Standard Guarantee (<em>MLSG</em>, also called <em>Dibao</em>) subsidy on household transportation expenditures. Utilizing data from the Chinese Social Survey, we employ a combination of the propensity score matching (<em>PSM</em>), causal forest (<em>CF</em>) and marginal treatment effect model (<em>MTE</em>) methodologies to rigorously estimate the subsidy’s effects. The <em>PSM</em> allows us to mitigate selection bias by matching <em>MLSG</em> recipients with comparable non-recipients. While the causal forest captures the heterogeneity of treatment effects across various household profiles. The result of <em>MTE</em> indicate that observable and essential heterogeneity are present to influence the effect of their subsidies, which present the consistent with <em>PSM</em> and <em>CF</em>. The causal mediation analysis indicates the mediating mechanism that <em>MLSG</em> impacts on household transportation expenditures, while also revealing significant variations among different regions. The study not only refines our understanding of the <em>MLSG</em>’s effects on household spending but also offers novel insights into applicational advancements by incorporating machine-learning techniques for policy evaluation. These results have important implications for policy formulation and refinement, particularly in the urban-rural differences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"159 ","pages":"Pages 1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling the causal effects of China’s minimum living standard guarantee on household transportation expenditures: A causal forest analysis\",\"authors\":\"Zheng Wu , Yihua Zhang , Mingyu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.09.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We investigate the causal effects of China’s Minimum Living Standard Guarantee (<em>MLSG</em>, also called <em>Dibao</em>) subsidy on household transportation expenditures. Utilizing data from the Chinese Social Survey, we employ a combination of the propensity score matching (<em>PSM</em>), causal forest (<em>CF</em>) and marginal treatment effect model (<em>MTE</em>) methodologies to rigorously estimate the subsidy’s effects. The <em>PSM</em> allows us to mitigate selection bias by matching <em>MLSG</em> recipients with comparable non-recipients. While the causal forest captures the heterogeneity of treatment effects across various household profiles. The result of <em>MTE</em> indicate that observable and essential heterogeneity are present to influence the effect of their subsidies, which present the consistent with <em>PSM</em> and <em>CF</em>. The causal mediation analysis indicates the mediating mechanism that <em>MLSG</em> impacts on household transportation expenditures, while also revealing significant variations among different regions. The study not only refines our understanding of the <em>MLSG</em>’s effects on household spending but also offers novel insights into applicational advancements by incorporating machine-learning techniques for policy evaluation. These results have important implications for policy formulation and refinement, particularly in the urban-rural differences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"159 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X24002725\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X24002725","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unveiling the causal effects of China’s minimum living standard guarantee on household transportation expenditures: A causal forest analysis
We investigate the causal effects of China’s Minimum Living Standard Guarantee (MLSG, also called Dibao) subsidy on household transportation expenditures. Utilizing data from the Chinese Social Survey, we employ a combination of the propensity score matching (PSM), causal forest (CF) and marginal treatment effect model (MTE) methodologies to rigorously estimate the subsidy’s effects. The PSM allows us to mitigate selection bias by matching MLSG recipients with comparable non-recipients. While the causal forest captures the heterogeneity of treatment effects across various household profiles. The result of MTE indicate that observable and essential heterogeneity are present to influence the effect of their subsidies, which present the consistent with PSM and CF. The causal mediation analysis indicates the mediating mechanism that MLSG impacts on household transportation expenditures, while also revealing significant variations among different regions. The study not only refines our understanding of the MLSG’s effects on household spending but also offers novel insights into applicational advancements by incorporating machine-learning techniques for policy evaluation. These results have important implications for policy formulation and refinement, particularly in the urban-rural differences.
期刊介绍:
Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.