在网上零售中,面对欺诈和后悔的客户,承诺进行麻烦的时间管理

IF 11 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104100
Rahul Kanyal, Sabyasachi Patra
{"title":"在网上零售中,面对欺诈和后悔的客户,承诺进行麻烦的时间管理","authors":"Rahul Kanyal,&nbsp;Sabyasachi Patra","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fraudulent customer return behavior, called “wardrobing,” incurs significant product return costs for online retailers. However, customers can also behave regretfully in online retailing, causing high product return costs. Consequently, we explore the combined effect of fraudulent and regretful customers in product returns. Research suggests implementing restrictive return policies to curb huge return costs due to fraudulent and regretful customer behaviors. One of the ways to implement a restrictive policy is by introducing hassle time. Consequently, retailers commit promised hassle times to customers, during which the retailers can approve the product returns and issue refunds. As a result, we determine how an online retailer can respond to regretful and fraudulent customers through promised hassle time while considering the stochastic nature of hassle time. In some situations, an online retailer might know that hassle time follows a specific probability distribution; in others, a retailer might not know the distribution. Therefore, we determine the optimal promised hassle time an online retailer must promise to regretful and fraudulent customers in each situation. For the first situation, we determine that a specific ratio, which we call the customer ratio, determines how the optimal promised hassle time changes with customers' fraud and regret levels. If the customer ratio is one, the optimal promised hassle time does not change; if it is greater than one, the optimal promised hassle time increases; and if it is less than one, the optimal promised hassle time decreases, with an increase in fraud and a decrease in regret levels. For the second situation, we propose a novel decision-making tool for online retailers, enabling them to optimize the promised hassle time. Finally, we generalize the results of our study to order cancellations with regretful customers, and shared mobility services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 104100"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promised hassle time management in online retailing with fraudulent and regretful customers\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Kanyal,&nbsp;Sabyasachi Patra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Fraudulent customer return behavior, called “wardrobing,” incurs significant product return costs for online retailers. However, customers can also behave regretfully in online retailing, causing high product return costs. Consequently, we explore the combined effect of fraudulent and regretful customers in product returns. Research suggests implementing restrictive return policies to curb huge return costs due to fraudulent and regretful customer behaviors. One of the ways to implement a restrictive policy is by introducing hassle time. Consequently, retailers commit promised hassle times to customers, during which the retailers can approve the product returns and issue refunds. As a result, we determine how an online retailer can respond to regretful and fraudulent customers through promised hassle time while considering the stochastic nature of hassle time. In some situations, an online retailer might know that hassle time follows a specific probability distribution; in others, a retailer might not know the distribution. Therefore, we determine the optimal promised hassle time an online retailer must promise to regretful and fraudulent customers in each situation. For the first situation, we determine that a specific ratio, which we call the customer ratio, determines how the optimal promised hassle time changes with customers' fraud and regret levels. If the customer ratio is one, the optimal promised hassle time does not change; if it is greater than one, the optimal promised hassle time increases; and if it is less than one, the optimal promised hassle time decreases, with an increase in fraud and a decrease in regret levels. For the second situation, we propose a novel decision-making tool for online retailers, enabling them to optimize the promised hassle time. Finally, we generalize the results of our study to order cancellations with regretful customers, and shared mobility services.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924003965\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924003965","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欺诈性顾客退货行为被称为 "揩油",会给在线零售商带来巨大的产品退货成本。然而,顾客在网上零售中也会有后悔行为,从而导致高昂的产品退货成本。因此,我们探讨了欺诈性顾客和后悔性顾客在产品退货中的综合影响。研究建议实施限制性退货政策,以遏制因欺诈和悔意顾客行为造成的巨额退货成本。实施限制性政策的方法之一是引入麻烦时间。因此,零售商向顾客承诺麻烦时间,在此期间,零售商可以批准退货并退款。因此,我们在考虑麻烦时间的随机性的同时,确定在线零售商如何通过承诺的麻烦时间来应对后悔和欺诈客户。在某些情况下,在线零售商可能知道麻烦时间遵循特定的概率分布;而在另一些情况下,零售商可能不知道该分布。因此,我们要确定在线零售商在每种情况下必须向悔约顾客和欺诈顾客承诺的最佳麻烦时间。对于第一种情况,我们确定了一个特定的比率(我们称之为顾客比率),该比率决定了最佳承诺麻烦时间如何随顾客的欺诈和后悔程度而变化。如果客户比率为 1,则最佳承诺的麻烦时间不变;如果大于 1,则最佳承诺的麻烦时间增加;如果小于 1,则最佳承诺的麻烦时间减少,欺诈增加,后悔程度降低。针对第二种情况,我们为在线零售商提出了一种新的决策工具,使他们能够优化承诺的麻烦时间。最后,我们将研究结果推广到有遗憾客户的订单取消和共享移动服务中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Promised hassle time management in online retailing with fraudulent and regretful customers
Fraudulent customer return behavior, called “wardrobing,” incurs significant product return costs for online retailers. However, customers can also behave regretfully in online retailing, causing high product return costs. Consequently, we explore the combined effect of fraudulent and regretful customers in product returns. Research suggests implementing restrictive return policies to curb huge return costs due to fraudulent and regretful customer behaviors. One of the ways to implement a restrictive policy is by introducing hassle time. Consequently, retailers commit promised hassle times to customers, during which the retailers can approve the product returns and issue refunds. As a result, we determine how an online retailer can respond to regretful and fraudulent customers through promised hassle time while considering the stochastic nature of hassle time. In some situations, an online retailer might know that hassle time follows a specific probability distribution; in others, a retailer might not know the distribution. Therefore, we determine the optimal promised hassle time an online retailer must promise to regretful and fraudulent customers in each situation. For the first situation, we determine that a specific ratio, which we call the customer ratio, determines how the optimal promised hassle time changes with customers' fraud and regret levels. If the customer ratio is one, the optimal promised hassle time does not change; if it is greater than one, the optimal promised hassle time increases; and if it is less than one, the optimal promised hassle time decreases, with an increase in fraud and a decrease in regret levels. For the second situation, we propose a novel decision-making tool for online retailers, enabling them to optimize the promised hassle time. Finally, we generalize the results of our study to order cancellations with regretful customers, and shared mobility services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
期刊最新文献
Psychological needs, brand attachment, and passion for themed-restaurant brands: A generational perspective Interactive product presentation in an immersive environment: The influence of functional control on hedonic aspects Metaverse friends with social benefits: Effects of social identity on the intention to purchase virtual products through site attachment, user engagement, and public self-consciousness Metaverse platform attributes and customer experience measurement Reputation vs. price: Sequential recommendations based on cue diagnosticity theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1