开发测量工作场所心理健康和幸福感的新工具

{"title":"开发测量工作场所心理健康和幸福感的新工具","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop and pilot test a new instrument measuring workplace mental health and well-being among health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and Methods</h3><div>A new survey instrument (hereafter referred to as the <em>Augusta Scale</em>) was developed using Qualtrics on the basis of the 5 essentials in the Office of the Surgeon General’s (OSG) framework for workplace mental health and well-being (protection from harm, connection and community, work-life harmony, mattering at work, and opportunity for growth). The <em>Augusta Scale</em> contains 22 core questions (on a 1-5 Likert scale) and several demographic characteristic questions. We piloted the <em>Augusta Scale</em> from May 9, 2023, to June 5, 2023, with health professionals serving as preceptors for the Georgia Area Health Education Centers and assessed the instrument’s psychometric properties under the classical test theory paradigm.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The survey’s response rate was 97.8% (583 responses out of 596 surveyed). Physicians comprised the largest health professional group surveyed (307, 52.7%), followed by advanced practice nurses (207, 35.5%), and physician assistants (69, 11.8%). The domain-specific Cronbach’s α ranged from 0.71 (0.67-0.75) to 0.90 (0.87-0.92), whereas the overall scale α was 0.94 (0.93-0.95), suggesting strong reliability. The Ω (high-order) score was 0.91, confirming that all items measured the latent construct. The convergent validity analysis confirmed the inverse relationship between total scale score and perception of burnout.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To our knowledge, the <em>Augusta Scale</em> is the first instrument to assess workplace mental health and well-being using the OSG’s framework. Findings from this pilot test of Georgia health professionals offer evidence to support its validity in certain domains.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a New Instrument to Measure Workplace Mental Health and Well-Being\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop and pilot test a new instrument measuring workplace mental health and well-being among health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and Methods</h3><div>A new survey instrument (hereafter referred to as the <em>Augusta Scale</em>) was developed using Qualtrics on the basis of the 5 essentials in the Office of the Surgeon General’s (OSG) framework for workplace mental health and well-being (protection from harm, connection and community, work-life harmony, mattering at work, and opportunity for growth). The <em>Augusta Scale</em> contains 22 core questions (on a 1-5 Likert scale) and several demographic characteristic questions. We piloted the <em>Augusta Scale</em> from May 9, 2023, to June 5, 2023, with health professionals serving as preceptors for the Georgia Area Health Education Centers and assessed the instrument’s psychometric properties under the classical test theory paradigm.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The survey’s response rate was 97.8% (583 responses out of 596 surveyed). Physicians comprised the largest health professional group surveyed (307, 52.7%), followed by advanced practice nurses (207, 35.5%), and physician assistants (69, 11.8%). The domain-specific Cronbach’s α ranged from 0.71 (0.67-0.75) to 0.90 (0.87-0.92), whereas the overall scale α was 0.94 (0.93-0.95), suggesting strong reliability. The Ω (high-order) score was 0.91, confirming that all items measured the latent construct. The convergent validity analysis confirmed the inverse relationship between total scale score and perception of burnout.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To our knowledge, the <em>Augusta Scale</em> is the first instrument to assess workplace mental health and well-being using the OSG’s framework. Findings from this pilot test of Georgia health professionals offer evidence to support its validity in certain domains.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标开发并试点测试一种测量卫生专业人员工作场所心理健康和幸福感的新工具。参与者和方法根据卫生总监办公室(OSG)的工作场所心理健康和幸福感框架中的 5 项基本要素(免受伤害、联系和社区、工作与生活的和谐、工作中的重要性以及成长的机会),使用 Qualtrics 开发了一种新的调查工具(以下简称奥古斯塔量表)。奥古斯塔量表包含 22 个核心问题(1-5 级李克特量表)和几个人口统计特征问题。我们于 2023 年 5 月 9 日至 6 月 5 日对奥古斯塔量表进行了试用,试用对象是担任佐治亚州地区健康教育中心指导教师的卫生专业人员,并在经典测试理论范式下对该工具的心理测量特性进行了评估。接受调查的最大医疗专业群体是医生(307 人,占 52.7%),其次是高级护士(207 人,占 35.5%)和医生助理(69 人,占 11.8%)。特定领域的 Cronbach's α 在 0.71(0.67-0.75)到 0.90(0.87-0.92)之间,而总体量表的 α 为 0.94(0.93-0.95),表明可靠性很高。Ω(高阶)得分为 0.91,证实了所有项目都测量了潜在构念。据我们所知,奥古斯塔量表是首个使用 OSG 框架评估工作场所心理健康和幸福感的工具。对佐治亚州医疗卫生专业人员的试点测试结果证明了该量表在某些领域的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a New Instrument to Measure Workplace Mental Health and Well-Being

Objective

To develop and pilot test a new instrument measuring workplace mental health and well-being among health professionals.

Participants and Methods

A new survey instrument (hereafter referred to as the Augusta Scale) was developed using Qualtrics on the basis of the 5 essentials in the Office of the Surgeon General’s (OSG) framework for workplace mental health and well-being (protection from harm, connection and community, work-life harmony, mattering at work, and opportunity for growth). The Augusta Scale contains 22 core questions (on a 1-5 Likert scale) and several demographic characteristic questions. We piloted the Augusta Scale from May 9, 2023, to June 5, 2023, with health professionals serving as preceptors for the Georgia Area Health Education Centers and assessed the instrument’s psychometric properties under the classical test theory paradigm.

Results

The survey’s response rate was 97.8% (583 responses out of 596 surveyed). Physicians comprised the largest health professional group surveyed (307, 52.7%), followed by advanced practice nurses (207, 35.5%), and physician assistants (69, 11.8%). The domain-specific Cronbach’s α ranged from 0.71 (0.67-0.75) to 0.90 (0.87-0.92), whereas the overall scale α was 0.94 (0.93-0.95), suggesting strong reliability. The Ω (high-order) score was 0.91, confirming that all items measured the latent construct. The convergent validity analysis confirmed the inverse relationship between total scale score and perception of burnout.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, the Augusta Scale is the first instrument to assess workplace mental health and well-being using the OSG’s framework. Findings from this pilot test of Georgia health professionals offer evidence to support its validity in certain domains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Development of a New Instrument to Measure Workplace Mental Health and Well-Being Rethinking Risk in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Assessing the Role of Myocardial Fibrosis and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Sudden Cardiac Death Electronic Health Records, Health Outcomes, and Vital Statistics: Opportunities and Challenges Intracardiac Shunts Among Patients Undergoing Oil-Based Contrast Lymphangiography: Prevalence and Rate of Systemic Arterial Embolic Complications Accuracy of Outcome Ascertainment in Long-Term Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1