桥面光栅对流线型双侧箱梁大跨度悬索人行天桥气动稳定性影响的实验研究

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105904
Yu Li, Pu Feng, Jia-Xin Xiao, Ming Chen, Jia-Wu Li
{"title":"桥面光栅对流线型双侧箱梁大跨度悬索人行天桥气动稳定性影响的实验研究","authors":"Yu Li,&nbsp;Pu Feng,&nbsp;Jia-Xin Xiao,&nbsp;Ming Chen,&nbsp;Jia-Wu Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the complex wind environment of canyon regions, different kinds of bridge deck gratings (BDGs) are often used as novel aerodynamic countermeasures to improve the wind-resistance performance of long-span suspension footbridges. However, how to design reasonable BDGs to effectively improve the aerodynamic stability of long-span suspension footbridges is still an urgent problem to be solved, and there is no literature reporting on it. Therefore, in this study, according to a long-span suspension footbridge with a streamlined double-side box girder (SDSBG) and BDGs, the section models with different percentages of opening (<em>β</em>) and layouts of BDGs were made, and then the force- and vibration-measured tests were performed to study the influence of the layouts and <em>β</em> of BDGs on the aerostatic and flutter stability. Furthermore, the influence mechanism of BDGs on the flutter stability was investigated, and the optimal <em>β</em> and layouts of BDGs were also proposed. So, it is found that: when 0% ≤ <em>β</em> ≤ 22% (especially <em>β</em> = 11%), BDGs are unfavorable to the aerodynamic stability; when <em>β</em> ≥ 44%, the aerodynamic stability can be significantly improved by using BDGs; moreover, the layouts of Cases O (<em>β</em> reaches the maximum) and S (two strips of BDGs installed along the longitudinal direction) are more beneficial to the aerodynamic stability. Therefore, the optimal <em>β</em> and layouts of BDGs beneficial to the aerodynamic stability are <em>β</em> ≥ 44% and the layouts of Cases O and S, respectively, and the studies in this manuscript can provide a meaningful reference for the wind resistance design of long-span suspension footbridges in the future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 105904"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental investigations on the influence of bridge deck gratings on the aerodynamic stability of the long-span suspension footbridge with a streamlined double-side box girder\",\"authors\":\"Yu Li,&nbsp;Pu Feng,&nbsp;Jia-Xin Xiao,&nbsp;Ming Chen,&nbsp;Jia-Wu Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the complex wind environment of canyon regions, different kinds of bridge deck gratings (BDGs) are often used as novel aerodynamic countermeasures to improve the wind-resistance performance of long-span suspension footbridges. However, how to design reasonable BDGs to effectively improve the aerodynamic stability of long-span suspension footbridges is still an urgent problem to be solved, and there is no literature reporting on it. Therefore, in this study, according to a long-span suspension footbridge with a streamlined double-side box girder (SDSBG) and BDGs, the section models with different percentages of opening (<em>β</em>) and layouts of BDGs were made, and then the force- and vibration-measured tests were performed to study the influence of the layouts and <em>β</em> of BDGs on the aerostatic and flutter stability. Furthermore, the influence mechanism of BDGs on the flutter stability was investigated, and the optimal <em>β</em> and layouts of BDGs were also proposed. So, it is found that: when 0% ≤ <em>β</em> ≤ 22% (especially <em>β</em> = 11%), BDGs are unfavorable to the aerodynamic stability; when <em>β</em> ≥ 44%, the aerodynamic stability can be significantly improved by using BDGs; moreover, the layouts of Cases O (<em>β</em> reaches the maximum) and S (two strips of BDGs installed along the longitudinal direction) are more beneficial to the aerodynamic stability. Therefore, the optimal <em>β</em> and layouts of BDGs beneficial to the aerodynamic stability are <em>β</em> ≥ 44% and the layouts of Cases O and S, respectively, and the studies in this manuscript can provide a meaningful reference for the wind resistance design of long-span suspension footbridges in the future.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics\",\"volume\":\"254 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105904\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610524002678\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610524002678","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在峡谷地区复杂的风环境中,不同类型的桥面光栅(BDGs)常被用作新型气动对策,以改善大跨度悬索人行天桥的抗风性能。然而,如何设计合理的桥面格栅以有效提高大跨度悬索桥的气动稳定性仍是一个亟待解决的问题,目前尚无相关文献报道。因此,本研究根据流线型双侧箱梁(SDSBG)和BDGs的大跨度悬索人行天桥,制作了不同开孔率(β)和BDGs布置的截面模型,然后进行了测力和测振试验,研究了BDGs的布置和β对气动稳定性和飘移稳定性的影响。此外,还研究了 BDG 对扑翼稳定性的影响机理,并提出了最佳的 BDG β 和布局。结果表明:当 0% ≤ β ≤ 22% 时(尤其是 β = 11%),BDGs 对气动稳定性不利;当 β ≥ 44% 时,使用 BDGs 可显著提高气动稳定性;此外,O(β 达到最大值)和 S(沿纵向安装两条 BDGs)两种布局对气动稳定性更有利。因此,有利于气动稳定性的最佳β和北斗七星布局分别为β≥44%和情况O和S的布局,本文的研究可为今后大跨度悬索人行天桥的抗风设计提供有意义的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental investigations on the influence of bridge deck gratings on the aerodynamic stability of the long-span suspension footbridge with a streamlined double-side box girder
In the complex wind environment of canyon regions, different kinds of bridge deck gratings (BDGs) are often used as novel aerodynamic countermeasures to improve the wind-resistance performance of long-span suspension footbridges. However, how to design reasonable BDGs to effectively improve the aerodynamic stability of long-span suspension footbridges is still an urgent problem to be solved, and there is no literature reporting on it. Therefore, in this study, according to a long-span suspension footbridge with a streamlined double-side box girder (SDSBG) and BDGs, the section models with different percentages of opening (β) and layouts of BDGs were made, and then the force- and vibration-measured tests were performed to study the influence of the layouts and β of BDGs on the aerostatic and flutter stability. Furthermore, the influence mechanism of BDGs on the flutter stability was investigated, and the optimal β and layouts of BDGs were also proposed. So, it is found that: when 0% ≤ β ≤ 22% (especially β = 11%), BDGs are unfavorable to the aerodynamic stability; when β ≥ 44%, the aerodynamic stability can be significantly improved by using BDGs; moreover, the layouts of Cases O (β reaches the maximum) and S (two strips of BDGs installed along the longitudinal direction) are more beneficial to the aerodynamic stability. Therefore, the optimal β and layouts of BDGs beneficial to the aerodynamic stability are β ≥ 44% and the layouts of Cases O and S, respectively, and the studies in this manuscript can provide a meaningful reference for the wind resistance design of long-span suspension footbridges in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
22.90%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the journal is to provide a means for the publication and interchange of information, on an international basis, on all those aspects of wind engineering that are included in the activities of the International Association for Wind Engineering http://www.iawe.org/. These are: social and economic impact of wind effects; wind characteristics and structure, local wind environments, wind loads and structural response, diffusion, pollutant dispersion and matter transport, wind effects on building heat loss and ventilation, wind effects on transport systems, aerodynamic aspects of wind energy generation, and codification of wind effects. Papers on these subjects describing full-scale measurements, wind-tunnel simulation studies, computational or theoretical methods are published, as well as papers dealing with the development of techniques and apparatus for wind engineering experiments.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating different categories of turbulence models for calculating air pollutant dispersion in street canyons with generic and real urban layouts Numerical simulation and experimental study of the effects of retaining block structures on wavefront steepening in rail tunnels A wake prediction framework based on the MOST Gaussian wake model and a deep learning approach Advanced statistical analysis of vortex-induced vibrations in suspension bridge hangers with and without Stockbridge dampers Converting dependence of extreme wind pressure coefficients across different epochs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1