采矿业的环境、社会和公司治理评级:因素和影响

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1016/j.exis.2024.101521
Mahelet G. Fikru , Jennifer Brodmann , Li Li Eng , J. Andrew Grant
{"title":"采矿业的环境、社会和公司治理评级:因素和影响","authors":"Mahelet G. Fikru ,&nbsp;Jennifer Brodmann ,&nbsp;Li Li Eng ,&nbsp;J. Andrew Grant","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While previous research explores the relationship between ESG ratings, firm size, and financial outcomes, there is a lack of comprehensive analysis comparing multiple ESG ratings within the mining industry. This gap is crucial given the increasing focus on ESG in mining operations and its potential impact on company performance. Based on proprietary financial and ESG ratings data from 200 mining companies, this study investigates the relationship between two different ESG ratings and firm characteristics. We compare ESG-rated firms with unrated firms in terms of firm size, and financial performance indicators, and explore country-level patterns in ESG ratings. Findings reveal that ESG-rated mining companies are generally larger than unrated firms but neither more profitable nor face lower debt costs. The results also show that, among rated firms, larger mining firms have more favorable ESG ratings than smaller ones. However, we fail to find a correlation between ESG ratings and financial performance. Finally, the evidence suggests that mining companies rated high for unmanaged ESG risk are likely to have lower ESG scores. This research contributes to understanding whether and how ESG ratings could impact investment decisions and risk management strategies in the mining sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 101521"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ESG ratings in the mining industry: Factors and implications\",\"authors\":\"Mahelet G. Fikru ,&nbsp;Jennifer Brodmann ,&nbsp;Li Li Eng ,&nbsp;J. Andrew Grant\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While previous research explores the relationship between ESG ratings, firm size, and financial outcomes, there is a lack of comprehensive analysis comparing multiple ESG ratings within the mining industry. This gap is crucial given the increasing focus on ESG in mining operations and its potential impact on company performance. Based on proprietary financial and ESG ratings data from 200 mining companies, this study investigates the relationship between two different ESG ratings and firm characteristics. We compare ESG-rated firms with unrated firms in terms of firm size, and financial performance indicators, and explore country-level patterns in ESG ratings. Findings reveal that ESG-rated mining companies are generally larger than unrated firms but neither more profitable nor face lower debt costs. The results also show that, among rated firms, larger mining firms have more favorable ESG ratings than smaller ones. However, we fail to find a correlation between ESG ratings and financial performance. Finally, the evidence suggests that mining companies rated high for unmanaged ESG risk are likely to have lower ESG scores. This research contributes to understanding whether and how ESG ratings could impact investment decisions and risk management strategies in the mining sector.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X24001175\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X24001175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的研究探讨了环境、社会和公司治理评级、公司规模和财务结果之间的关系,但缺乏对采矿业内多种环境、社会和公司治理评级进行比较的全面分析。鉴于人们越来越关注矿业运营中的环境、社会和公司治理及其对公司业绩的潜在影响,这一差距至关重要。基于 200 家矿业公司的专有财务和 ESG 评级数据,本研究调查了两种不同 ESG 评级与公司特征之间的关系。我们比较了获得 ESG 评级的公司和未获得 ESG 评级的公司在公司规模和财务业绩指标方面的情况,并探讨了 ESG 评级在国家层面的模式。研究结果表明,获得 ESG 评级的矿业公司一般比未获得评级的公司规模更大,但利润率和债务成本都不高。结果还显示,在获得评级的公司中,规模较大的矿业公司比规模较小的公司获得更有利的 ESG 评级。但是,我们没有发现环境、社会和公司治理评级与财务业绩之间的相关性。最后,有证据表明,因未管理环境、社会和公司治理风险而被评为高评级的矿业公司,其环境、社会和公司治理得分可能较低。这项研究有助于了解环境、社会和公司治理评级是否以及如何影响采矿业的投资决策和风险管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ESG ratings in the mining industry: Factors and implications
While previous research explores the relationship between ESG ratings, firm size, and financial outcomes, there is a lack of comprehensive analysis comparing multiple ESG ratings within the mining industry. This gap is crucial given the increasing focus on ESG in mining operations and its potential impact on company performance. Based on proprietary financial and ESG ratings data from 200 mining companies, this study investigates the relationship between two different ESG ratings and firm characteristics. We compare ESG-rated firms with unrated firms in terms of firm size, and financial performance indicators, and explore country-level patterns in ESG ratings. Findings reveal that ESG-rated mining companies are generally larger than unrated firms but neither more profitable nor face lower debt costs. The results also show that, among rated firms, larger mining firms have more favorable ESG ratings than smaller ones. However, we fail to find a correlation between ESG ratings and financial performance. Finally, the evidence suggests that mining companies rated high for unmanaged ESG risk are likely to have lower ESG scores. This research contributes to understanding whether and how ESG ratings could impact investment decisions and risk management strategies in the mining sector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
期刊最新文献
Economic impacts of oil and gas clusters: Analyzing the influence of oil and gas revenues in Brazil and Texas Extractive separations: A Polanyian note on the international investment treaty regime “All we have left is to defend our reserve”: Social structures and community resistance to large-scale gold mining in the Manuripi Wildlife Reserve in northern Bolivia Drivers of artisanal and small-scale mining in the Denkyira area, central region of Ghana Hydrosocial imaginaries of green extractivism: Water-energy transitions and geothermal lithium development at the Salton Sea in Imperial Valley, California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1