食道癌和胃癌预后标志物回顾。它们准备好用于临床实践了吗?

V. Kunene , M. Ding , M. Yap , E.A. Griffiths , P. Taniere , D. Fackrell , S. Butler , G. Contino
{"title":"食道癌和胃癌预后标志物回顾。它们准备好用于临床实践了吗?","authors":"V. Kunene ,&nbsp;M. Ding ,&nbsp;M. Yap ,&nbsp;E.A. Griffiths ,&nbsp;P. Taniere ,&nbsp;D. Fackrell ,&nbsp;S. Butler ,&nbsp;G. Contino","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oesophageal and gastric cancer outcomes remain poor despite the introduction of new treatments in the past decade. Most patients subjected to chemotherapy or surgery do not, in the long term, benefit from treatment but suffer side-effects. Although next-generation sequencing has accelerated the identification of various genomic aberrations, most have yet to be applied to routine clinical practice. Here, we review published data from systemic reviews and meta-analyses from the past 8 years reporting prognostic markers and why these have not gained traction in clinical practice and how we can improve on this.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic markers in oesophageal and gastric cancer review. Are they ready for clinical practice?\",\"authors\":\"V. Kunene ,&nbsp;M. Ding ,&nbsp;M. Yap ,&nbsp;E.A. Griffiths ,&nbsp;P. Taniere ,&nbsp;D. Fackrell ,&nbsp;S. Butler ,&nbsp;G. Contino\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Oesophageal and gastric cancer outcomes remain poor despite the introduction of new treatments in the past decade. Most patients subjected to chemotherapy or surgery do not, in the long term, benefit from treatment but suffer side-effects. Although next-generation sequencing has accelerated the identification of various genomic aberrations, most have yet to be applied to routine clinical practice. Here, we review published data from systemic reviews and meta-analyses from the past 8 years reporting prognostic markers and why these have not gained traction in clinical practice and how we can improve on this.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000529\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在过去十年中引入了新的治疗方法,但食道癌和胃癌的治疗效果仍然不佳。大多数接受化疗或手术的患者从长远来看并不能从治疗中获益,反而会产生副作用。虽然新一代测序技术加快了各种基因组畸变的鉴定,但大多数畸变尚未应用于常规临床实践。在此,我们回顾了过去 8 年中系统综述和荟萃分析中报告预后标志物的已发表数据,以及这些标志物未能在临床实践中得到应用的原因,以及我们该如何改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prognostic markers in oesophageal and gastric cancer review. Are they ready for clinical practice?
Oesophageal and gastric cancer outcomes remain poor despite the introduction of new treatments in the past decade. Most patients subjected to chemotherapy or surgery do not, in the long term, benefit from treatment but suffer side-effects. Although next-generation sequencing has accelerated the identification of various genomic aberrations, most have yet to be applied to routine clinical practice. Here, we review published data from systemic reviews and meta-analyses from the past 8 years reporting prognostic markers and why these have not gained traction in clinical practice and how we can improve on this.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with gastrooesophageal adenocarcinoma who are ctDNA and HER2 positive: DECIPHER PD-L1 as a response biomarker to chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in operable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of neoadjuvant clinical trials Practical management of oligometastatic gastric cancer Risk factor of severe diarrhea and enterocolitis induced by CAPOX: a retrospective multicenter study Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor expression in gastrointestinal stromal tumours
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1