长期生物降解地膜覆盖对华北平原玉米产量和水分生产率的影响

IF 5.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agricultural Water Management Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109094
Xiudi Shangguan , Xin Wang , Meng Yuan , Mingliang Gao , Zhendong Liu , Ming Li , Rui Zong , Chitao Sun , Mingming Zhang , Quanqi Li
{"title":"长期生物降解地膜覆盖对华北平原玉米产量和水分生产率的影响","authors":"Xiudi Shangguan ,&nbsp;Xin Wang ,&nbsp;Meng Yuan ,&nbsp;Mingliang Gao ,&nbsp;Zhendong Liu ,&nbsp;Ming Li ,&nbsp;Rui Zong ,&nbsp;Chitao Sun ,&nbsp;Mingming Zhang ,&nbsp;Quanqi Li","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biodegradable films are considered ideal alternatives to polyethylene films because of their advantages in increasing crop yield and controlling soil pollution. However, the influences of biodegradable film mulching on soil physicochemical environments and water productivity after long-term mulching remain poorly understood. Therefore, a field experiment after long-term mulching (since 2016) was conducted to explore the effects of black biodegradable film (BB), transparent biodegradable film (TB), and traditional polyethylene film (PE) on soil physicochemical environments, aboveground biomass accumulation, grain yield, evapotranspiration, and water productivity (WP) of maize in the 2021 and 2022 in the North China Plain. The results showed that polyethylene films and biodegradable films had a similar ability to preserve soil moisture, promote maize growth, reduce evapotranspiration, and increase WP. Moreover, the performances of BB were more equivalent to PE, and there was no significant difference on WP and yield under BB and PE. Compared with traditional flat planting without mulching (CK), BB and PE significantly increased yield (9.5 % and 12.7 % in 2021; 5.25 % and 6.37 % in 2022) and WP (11.54 % and 21.47 % in 2021; 24.28 % and 23.42 % in 2022). Film mulching treatments increased the soil organic carbon sequestration rate, and the content of soil organic carbon, microbial activity, and urease activity in the 0–20 cm soil layer compared with CK. According to structural equation modeling, the increasing soil water storage because of films mulching positively influenced yield by enhancing enzyme activities which were related to soil nutrients. Over all, these results showed that black biodegradable film is an ideal replacement for polyethylene films under long-term mulching conditions because of its comparable agronomic performance and influence on soil physicochemical environments in the North China Plain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":"304 ","pages":"Article 109094"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of long-term biodegradable film mulching on yield and water productivity of maize in North China Plain\",\"authors\":\"Xiudi Shangguan ,&nbsp;Xin Wang ,&nbsp;Meng Yuan ,&nbsp;Mingliang Gao ,&nbsp;Zhendong Liu ,&nbsp;Ming Li ,&nbsp;Rui Zong ,&nbsp;Chitao Sun ,&nbsp;Mingming Zhang ,&nbsp;Quanqi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Biodegradable films are considered ideal alternatives to polyethylene films because of their advantages in increasing crop yield and controlling soil pollution. However, the influences of biodegradable film mulching on soil physicochemical environments and water productivity after long-term mulching remain poorly understood. Therefore, a field experiment after long-term mulching (since 2016) was conducted to explore the effects of black biodegradable film (BB), transparent biodegradable film (TB), and traditional polyethylene film (PE) on soil physicochemical environments, aboveground biomass accumulation, grain yield, evapotranspiration, and water productivity (WP) of maize in the 2021 and 2022 in the North China Plain. The results showed that polyethylene films and biodegradable films had a similar ability to preserve soil moisture, promote maize growth, reduce evapotranspiration, and increase WP. Moreover, the performances of BB were more equivalent to PE, and there was no significant difference on WP and yield under BB and PE. Compared with traditional flat planting without mulching (CK), BB and PE significantly increased yield (9.5 % and 12.7 % in 2021; 5.25 % and 6.37 % in 2022) and WP (11.54 % and 21.47 % in 2021; 24.28 % and 23.42 % in 2022). Film mulching treatments increased the soil organic carbon sequestration rate, and the content of soil organic carbon, microbial activity, and urease activity in the 0–20 cm soil layer compared with CK. According to structural equation modeling, the increasing soil water storage because of films mulching positively influenced yield by enhancing enzyme activities which were related to soil nutrients. Over all, these results showed that black biodegradable film is an ideal replacement for polyethylene films under long-term mulching conditions because of its comparable agronomic performance and influence on soil physicochemical environments in the North China Plain.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Water Management\",\"volume\":\"304 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109094\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Water Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837742400430X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837742400430X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物降解薄膜因其在提高作物产量和控制土壤污染方面的优势,被认为是聚乙烯薄膜的理想替代品。然而,生物降解膜长期覆盖后对土壤理化环境和水分生产率的影响仍然知之甚少。因此,在华北平原进行了长期地膜覆盖后(自2016年起)的田间试验,探讨黑色生物降解膜(BB)、透明生物降解膜(TB)和传统聚乙烯膜(PE)对2021年和2022年玉米土壤理化环境、地上生物量积累、谷物产量、蒸腾量和水分生产力(WP)的影响。结果表明,聚乙烯薄膜和生物降解薄膜在保持土壤水分、促进玉米生长、降低蒸散量和提高水分生产率方面具有相似的能力。此外,BB 的性能更接近 PE,且 BB 和 PE 在可湿性粉剂和产量方面没有显著差异。与不覆膜的传统平地种植(CK)相比,BB 和 PE 显著提高了产量(2021 年分别为 9.5 % 和 12.7 %;2022 年分别为 5.25 % 和 6.37 %)和可湿性粉剂(2021 年分别为 11.54 % 和 21.47 %;2022 年分别为 24.28 % 和 23.42 %)。与 CK 相比,覆膜处理提高了土壤有机碳固持率、0-20 cm 土层土壤有机碳含量、微生物活性和脲酶活性。根据结构方程模型,地膜覆盖增加了土壤储水量,通过提高与土壤养分相关的酶活性对产量产生了积极影响。总之,这些结果表明,在华北平原,黑色生物降解薄膜具有可比的农艺性能和对土壤理化环境的影响,是长期地膜覆盖条件下替代聚乙烯薄膜的理想选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of long-term biodegradable film mulching on yield and water productivity of maize in North China Plain
Biodegradable films are considered ideal alternatives to polyethylene films because of their advantages in increasing crop yield and controlling soil pollution. However, the influences of biodegradable film mulching on soil physicochemical environments and water productivity after long-term mulching remain poorly understood. Therefore, a field experiment after long-term mulching (since 2016) was conducted to explore the effects of black biodegradable film (BB), transparent biodegradable film (TB), and traditional polyethylene film (PE) on soil physicochemical environments, aboveground biomass accumulation, grain yield, evapotranspiration, and water productivity (WP) of maize in the 2021 and 2022 in the North China Plain. The results showed that polyethylene films and biodegradable films had a similar ability to preserve soil moisture, promote maize growth, reduce evapotranspiration, and increase WP. Moreover, the performances of BB were more equivalent to PE, and there was no significant difference on WP and yield under BB and PE. Compared with traditional flat planting without mulching (CK), BB and PE significantly increased yield (9.5 % and 12.7 % in 2021; 5.25 % and 6.37 % in 2022) and WP (11.54 % and 21.47 % in 2021; 24.28 % and 23.42 % in 2022). Film mulching treatments increased the soil organic carbon sequestration rate, and the content of soil organic carbon, microbial activity, and urease activity in the 0–20 cm soil layer compared with CK. According to structural equation modeling, the increasing soil water storage because of films mulching positively influenced yield by enhancing enzyme activities which were related to soil nutrients. Over all, these results showed that black biodegradable film is an ideal replacement for polyethylene films under long-term mulching conditions because of its comparable agronomic performance and influence on soil physicochemical environments in the North China Plain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
期刊最新文献
Influences of residual stomatal conductance on the intrinsic water use efficiency of two C3 and two C4 species Accurate irrigation decision-making of winter wheat at the filling stage based on UAV hyperspectral inversion of leaf water content Comparative analysis of machine learning models and explainable AI for agriculture drought prediction: A case study of the Ta-pieh mountains Intermittent sprinkler irrigation during the establishment of strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) bare-root transplants conserves water without loss of yield and fruit quality Biochar enhances soil hydrological function by improving the pore structure of saline soil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1