基于定量 FRAM 的 FPSO 泄漏应急响应复原力评估

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Reliability Engineering & System Safety Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2024.110526
Jianxing Yu , Qingze Zeng , Yang Yu , Baolei Zhang , Wentao Ma , Shibo Wu , Hongyu Ding , Zhenmian Li
{"title":"基于定量 FRAM 的 FPSO 泄漏应急响应复原力评估","authors":"Jianxing Yu ,&nbsp;Qingze Zeng ,&nbsp;Yang Yu ,&nbsp;Baolei Zhang ,&nbsp;Wentao Ma ,&nbsp;Shibo Wu ,&nbsp;Hongyu Ding ,&nbsp;Zhenmian Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2024.110526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>FPSO production process is prone to leakage, and failure to respond promptly and effectively will lead to accident escalation and serious consequences. However, traditional safety assessment methods cannot handle the nonlinear relationships between human, technology, and organization in emergency response process. This study proposes a quantitative FRAM to evaluate the emergency response resilience of FPSO leakage. This method establishes a resilience evaluation framework including three tiers: function, ability, and system, which can quantify system resilience based on the variability of function. First, identify basic functions according to the four stages of monitoring, response, learning and anticipation in the emergency response process, and establish the FRAM model of FPSO leakage emergency response. Then, the quantitative FRAM and Monte Carlo simulation are combined to calculate the variabilities of functions under different operating conditions. Finally, based on the simulation results, the variabilities of basic functions are aggregated and statistically analyzed to quantify system resilience. The implementation process of this method is illustrated by a case study. The influence of different factors on the system resilience is analyzed by setting various operation scenarios, and critical functions are identified by sensitivity analysis, which can provide reference for improving system resilience and ensuring FPSO safety production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54500,"journal":{"name":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resilience assessment of FPSO leakage emergency response based on quantitative FRAM\",\"authors\":\"Jianxing Yu ,&nbsp;Qingze Zeng ,&nbsp;Yang Yu ,&nbsp;Baolei Zhang ,&nbsp;Wentao Ma ,&nbsp;Shibo Wu ,&nbsp;Hongyu Ding ,&nbsp;Zhenmian Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ress.2024.110526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>FPSO production process is prone to leakage, and failure to respond promptly and effectively will lead to accident escalation and serious consequences. However, traditional safety assessment methods cannot handle the nonlinear relationships between human, technology, and organization in emergency response process. This study proposes a quantitative FRAM to evaluate the emergency response resilience of FPSO leakage. This method establishes a resilience evaluation framework including three tiers: function, ability, and system, which can quantify system resilience based on the variability of function. First, identify basic functions according to the four stages of monitoring, response, learning and anticipation in the emergency response process, and establish the FRAM model of FPSO leakage emergency response. Then, the quantitative FRAM and Monte Carlo simulation are combined to calculate the variabilities of functions under different operating conditions. Finally, based on the simulation results, the variabilities of basic functions are aggregated and statistically analyzed to quantify system resilience. The implementation process of this method is illustrated by a case study. The influence of different factors on the system resilience is analyzed by setting various operation scenarios, and critical functions are identified by sensitivity analysis, which can provide reference for improving system resilience and ensuring FPSO safety production.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reliability Engineering & System Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reliability Engineering & System Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024005982\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024005982","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

FPSO 生产过程中容易发生泄漏,如果不能及时有效应对,将导致事故升级,造成严重后果。然而,传统的安全评估方法无法处理应急响应过程中人、技术和组织之间的非线性关系。本研究提出了一种定量的 FPSO 泄漏应急响应弹性评估方法。该方法建立了包括功能、能力和系统三个层级的复原力评价框架,可根据功能的可变性对系统复原力进行量化。首先,根据应急响应过程中的监测、响应、学习和预测四个阶段确定基本功能,建立 FPSO 泄漏应急响应 FRAM 模型。然后,将定量 FRAM 与蒙特卡罗模拟相结合,计算不同运行条件下的功能变异性。最后,根据模拟结果,对基本功能的变异性进行汇总和统计分析,以量化系统的恢复能力。本方法的实施过程通过一个案例研究加以说明。通过设置不同的运行场景,分析不同因素对系统恢复能力的影响,并通过敏感性分析确定关键功能,为提高系统恢复能力、确保 FPSO 安全生产提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Resilience assessment of FPSO leakage emergency response based on quantitative FRAM
FPSO production process is prone to leakage, and failure to respond promptly and effectively will lead to accident escalation and serious consequences. However, traditional safety assessment methods cannot handle the nonlinear relationships between human, technology, and organization in emergency response process. This study proposes a quantitative FRAM to evaluate the emergency response resilience of FPSO leakage. This method establishes a resilience evaluation framework including three tiers: function, ability, and system, which can quantify system resilience based on the variability of function. First, identify basic functions according to the four stages of monitoring, response, learning and anticipation in the emergency response process, and establish the FRAM model of FPSO leakage emergency response. Then, the quantitative FRAM and Monte Carlo simulation are combined to calculate the variabilities of functions under different operating conditions. Finally, based on the simulation results, the variabilities of basic functions are aggregated and statistically analyzed to quantify system resilience. The implementation process of this method is illustrated by a case study. The influence of different factors on the system resilience is analyzed by setting various operation scenarios, and critical functions are identified by sensitivity analysis, which can provide reference for improving system resilience and ensuring FPSO safety production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Reliability Engineering & System Safety 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
39.50%
发文量
621
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Elsevier publishes Reliability Engineering & System Safety in association with the European Safety and Reliability Association and the Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division. The international journal is devoted to developing and applying methods to enhance the safety and reliability of complex technological systems, like nuclear power plants, chemical plants, hazardous waste facilities, space systems, offshore and maritime systems, transportation systems, constructed infrastructure, and manufacturing plants. The journal normally publishes only articles that involve the analysis of substantive problems related to the reliability of complex systems or present techniques and/or theoretical results that have a discernable relationship to the solution of such problems. An important aim is to balance academic material and practical applications.
期刊最新文献
Employing the cluster of node cut sets to improve the robustness of the network measured by connectivity Preventive maintenance strategy for multi-component systems in dynamic risk assessment A new reliability health status assessment model for complex systems based on belief rule base Toward the resilience of UAV swarms with percolation theory under attacks Health management of power batteries in low temperatures based on Adaptive Transfer Enformer framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1