线上线下溢出效应对制造商在线销售模式选择的影响

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Industrial Engineering Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2024.110584
Chaoqun Yi , Yu Cao , Zihan Zhou , Guangyu Wan
{"title":"线上线下溢出效应对制造商在线销售模式选择的影响","authors":"Chaoqun Yi ,&nbsp;Yu Cao ,&nbsp;Zihan Zhou ,&nbsp;Guangyu Wan","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2024.110584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Numerous studies have confirmed the existence of two types of spillover effects (i.e., negative or positive spillover) from online sales to offline sales. The manufacturer’s chosen strategy for sales mode can be challenging and complex when considering online sales efforts and spillover effects. With positive spillover, enhancing online sales efforts not only increases online demand but also stimulates offline demand. Conversely, with negative spillover, an increase in online sales efforts boosts online sales while simultaneously cannibalizing offline sales. This paper analyzes the manufacturer’s choice between reselling and agency selling modes and investigates how both positive and negative spillover effects influence the manufacturer’s choice when considering online sales efforts. We demonstrate that, with a significant positive spillover, agency selling is the manufacturer’s optimal strategy. Counterintuitively, we show that the larger the negative spillover, the more the manufacturer prefers reselling. Furthermore, when the negative or positive spillover is relatively low, the manufacturer’s decision regarding the sales mode depends on the commission rate. Moreover, our study highlights that the optimal selling strategy for the manufacturer is affected by consumers’ sensitivity to online sales efforts. We also find that when considering online sales efforts, in scenarios where there is a significant positive spillover, the manufacturer is better off adopting agency selling. Meanwhile, the manufacturer may obtain negative profits from the online channel but can be compensated by the profits made from the offline channel. We extend the model to consider online sales efforts provided by the online platform in two selling modes, demonstrating the robustness of our main outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55220,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 110584"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of online-to-offline spillovers on manufacturers’ online sales mode selection\",\"authors\":\"Chaoqun Yi ,&nbsp;Yu Cao ,&nbsp;Zihan Zhou ,&nbsp;Guangyu Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cie.2024.110584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Numerous studies have confirmed the existence of two types of spillover effects (i.e., negative or positive spillover) from online sales to offline sales. The manufacturer’s chosen strategy for sales mode can be challenging and complex when considering online sales efforts and spillover effects. With positive spillover, enhancing online sales efforts not only increases online demand but also stimulates offline demand. Conversely, with negative spillover, an increase in online sales efforts boosts online sales while simultaneously cannibalizing offline sales. This paper analyzes the manufacturer’s choice between reselling and agency selling modes and investigates how both positive and negative spillover effects influence the manufacturer’s choice when considering online sales efforts. We demonstrate that, with a significant positive spillover, agency selling is the manufacturer’s optimal strategy. Counterintuitively, we show that the larger the negative spillover, the more the manufacturer prefers reselling. Furthermore, when the negative or positive spillover is relatively low, the manufacturer’s decision regarding the sales mode depends on the commission rate. Moreover, our study highlights that the optimal selling strategy for the manufacturer is affected by consumers’ sensitivity to online sales efforts. We also find that when considering online sales efforts, in scenarios where there is a significant positive spillover, the manufacturer is better off adopting agency selling. Meanwhile, the manufacturer may obtain negative profits from the online channel but can be compensated by the profits made from the offline channel. We extend the model to consider online sales efforts provided by the online platform in two selling modes, demonstrating the robustness of our main outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Industrial Engineering\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110584\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Industrial Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835224007058\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835224007058","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大量研究证实,从线上销售到线下销售存在两种溢出效应(即负溢出或正溢出)。在考虑线上销售努力和溢出效应时,制造商所选择的销售模式战略可能具有挑战性和复杂性。在正溢出效应下,加强线上销售不仅会增加线上需求,还会刺激线下需求。反之,在负溢出效应的情况下,增加在线销售力度在促进在线销售的同时,也会蚕食线下销售。本文分析了制造商在转售和代理销售模式之间的选择,并研究了正负溢出效应如何影响制造商在考虑在线销售时的选择。我们证明,在正溢出效应显著的情况下,代理销售是制造商的最优策略。与直觉相反的是,我们发现负溢出效应越大,制造商越倾向于转售。此外,当负溢出或正溢出相对较低时,制造商对销售模式的决定取决于佣金率。此外,我们的研究还表明,制造商的最佳销售策略会受到消费者对在线销售敏感度的影响。我们还发现,在考虑在线销售时,如果存在显著的正溢出效应,制造商最好采用代理销售。同时,制造商可能会从线上渠道获得负利润,但可以从线下渠道获得利润补偿。我们对模型进行了扩展,考虑了在线平台在两种销售模式下提供的在线销售努力,证明了我们主要结果的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of online-to-offline spillovers on manufacturers’ online sales mode selection
Numerous studies have confirmed the existence of two types of spillover effects (i.e., negative or positive spillover) from online sales to offline sales. The manufacturer’s chosen strategy for sales mode can be challenging and complex when considering online sales efforts and spillover effects. With positive spillover, enhancing online sales efforts not only increases online demand but also stimulates offline demand. Conversely, with negative spillover, an increase in online sales efforts boosts online sales while simultaneously cannibalizing offline sales. This paper analyzes the manufacturer’s choice between reselling and agency selling modes and investigates how both positive and negative spillover effects influence the manufacturer’s choice when considering online sales efforts. We demonstrate that, with a significant positive spillover, agency selling is the manufacturer’s optimal strategy. Counterintuitively, we show that the larger the negative spillover, the more the manufacturer prefers reselling. Furthermore, when the negative or positive spillover is relatively low, the manufacturer’s decision regarding the sales mode depends on the commission rate. Moreover, our study highlights that the optimal selling strategy for the manufacturer is affected by consumers’ sensitivity to online sales efforts. We also find that when considering online sales efforts, in scenarios where there is a significant positive spillover, the manufacturer is better off adopting agency selling. Meanwhile, the manufacturer may obtain negative profits from the online channel but can be compensated by the profits made from the offline channel. We extend the model to consider online sales efforts provided by the online platform in two selling modes, demonstrating the robustness of our main outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Computers & Industrial Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.70%
发文量
794
审稿时长
10.6 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Industrial Engineering (CAIE) is dedicated to researchers, educators, and practitioners in industrial engineering and related fields. Pioneering the integration of computers in research, education, and practice, industrial engineering has evolved to make computers and electronic communication integral to its domain. CAIE publishes original contributions focusing on the development of novel computerized methodologies to address industrial engineering problems. It also highlights the applications of these methodologies to issues within the broader industrial engineering and associated communities. The journal actively encourages submissions that push the boundaries of fundamental theories and concepts in industrial engineering techniques.
期刊最新文献
Robotic disassembly of electric vehicle batteries: Technologies and opportunities A location-sizing and routing model for a biomethane production chain fed by municipal waste A reinforcement learning-driven cooperative scatter search for the knapsack problem with forfeits Ergonomic design of Human-Robot collaborative workstation in the Era of Industry 5.0 Towards sustainable cognitive digital twins: A portfolio management tool for waste mitigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1