具有社会影响力的电子商务平台中预售的销售模式选择和退货政策

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Industrial Engineering Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2024.110620
Haijiao Li , Kuan Yang , Ye Yao , Guoqing Zhang
{"title":"具有社会影响力的电子商务平台中预售的销售模式选择和退货政策","authors":"Haijiao Li ,&nbsp;Kuan Yang ,&nbsp;Ye Yao ,&nbsp;Guoqing Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2024.110620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advance selling is increasingly employed to mitigate demand uncertainty, raise consumer awareness of products, and even exert social influence on subsequent sales. However, consumers may hesitate to pre-order products due to uncertainty about product valuation. As a response, sellers have begun implementing return policies and utilizing online retail platforms to alleviate the uncertainty. This study aims to investigate the interaction between return policies for advance selling and selling formats of e-commerce platforms considering the impact of social influence. We examine a two-period platform supply chain that includes agency selling, reselling, and hybrid selling formats with and without return policies. Using game theory models, we analyze pricing decisions and profits of each player under six possible scenarios. The results indicate that the manufacturer consistently prefers adopting a Money-Back Guarantee (MBG) return policy regardless of the selling format. However, the MBG return policy is not always advantageous for the platform, except in the case of low social influence. In such a case, the platform may implement the MBG return policy to boost advance sales, thereby enhancing the penetration power from advance sales to regular sales. Regarding selling formats, the platform and the manufacturer opt for the reselling and agency selling, respectively, when the commission rate is low; otherwise, they adopt the agency selling and hybrid selling, respectively. Furthermore, we explore the impact of critical drivers on the pricing decisions and profits within the platform supply chain. Our study offers valuable insights into implementing return policies and determining selling formats.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55220,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 110620"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selling mode choice and return policy for advance selling in an e-commerce platform with social influence\",\"authors\":\"Haijiao Li ,&nbsp;Kuan Yang ,&nbsp;Ye Yao ,&nbsp;Guoqing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cie.2024.110620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Advance selling is increasingly employed to mitigate demand uncertainty, raise consumer awareness of products, and even exert social influence on subsequent sales. However, consumers may hesitate to pre-order products due to uncertainty about product valuation. As a response, sellers have begun implementing return policies and utilizing online retail platforms to alleviate the uncertainty. This study aims to investigate the interaction between return policies for advance selling and selling formats of e-commerce platforms considering the impact of social influence. We examine a two-period platform supply chain that includes agency selling, reselling, and hybrid selling formats with and without return policies. Using game theory models, we analyze pricing decisions and profits of each player under six possible scenarios. The results indicate that the manufacturer consistently prefers adopting a Money-Back Guarantee (MBG) return policy regardless of the selling format. However, the MBG return policy is not always advantageous for the platform, except in the case of low social influence. In such a case, the platform may implement the MBG return policy to boost advance sales, thereby enhancing the penetration power from advance sales to regular sales. Regarding selling formats, the platform and the manufacturer opt for the reselling and agency selling, respectively, when the commission rate is low; otherwise, they adopt the agency selling and hybrid selling, respectively. Furthermore, we explore the impact of critical drivers on the pricing decisions and profits within the platform supply chain. Our study offers valuable insights into implementing return policies and determining selling formats.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Industrial Engineering\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110620\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Industrial Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835224007423\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835224007423","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了缓解需求的不确定性,提高消费者对产品的认知度,甚至对后续销售施加社会影响,预售被越来越多地采用。然而,由于对产品估值的不确定性,消费者在预购产品时可能会犹豫不决。作为回应,卖家开始实施退货政策并利用在线零售平台来缓解这种不确定性。本研究旨在考察预售退货政策与电子商务平台销售形式之间的互动关系,同时考虑社会影响力的影响。我们研究了一个包含代理销售、转售和有无退货政策的混合销售形式的两期平台供应链。利用博弈论模型,我们分析了六种可能情况下每个参与者的定价决策和利润。结果表明,无论采用哪种销售形式,制造商都倾向于采用退款保证(MBG)退货政策。然而,MBG 退货政策并不总是对平台有利,除非是在社会影响力较低的情况下。在这种情况下,平台可以实施 "全额退款保证 "政策来促进预售,从而增强预售对常规销售的渗透力。在销售形式方面,当佣金率较低时,平台和制造商会分别选择转售和代理销售;反之,则会分别采用代理销售和混合销售。此外,我们还探讨了关键驱动因素对平台供应链定价决策和利润的影响。我们的研究为实施退货政策和确定销售形式提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Selling mode choice and return policy for advance selling in an e-commerce platform with social influence
Advance selling is increasingly employed to mitigate demand uncertainty, raise consumer awareness of products, and even exert social influence on subsequent sales. However, consumers may hesitate to pre-order products due to uncertainty about product valuation. As a response, sellers have begun implementing return policies and utilizing online retail platforms to alleviate the uncertainty. This study aims to investigate the interaction between return policies for advance selling and selling formats of e-commerce platforms considering the impact of social influence. We examine a two-period platform supply chain that includes agency selling, reselling, and hybrid selling formats with and without return policies. Using game theory models, we analyze pricing decisions and profits of each player under six possible scenarios. The results indicate that the manufacturer consistently prefers adopting a Money-Back Guarantee (MBG) return policy regardless of the selling format. However, the MBG return policy is not always advantageous for the platform, except in the case of low social influence. In such a case, the platform may implement the MBG return policy to boost advance sales, thereby enhancing the penetration power from advance sales to regular sales. Regarding selling formats, the platform and the manufacturer opt for the reselling and agency selling, respectively, when the commission rate is low; otherwise, they adopt the agency selling and hybrid selling, respectively. Furthermore, we explore the impact of critical drivers on the pricing decisions and profits within the platform supply chain. Our study offers valuable insights into implementing return policies and determining selling formats.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Computers & Industrial Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.70%
发文量
794
审稿时长
10.6 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Industrial Engineering (CAIE) is dedicated to researchers, educators, and practitioners in industrial engineering and related fields. Pioneering the integration of computers in research, education, and practice, industrial engineering has evolved to make computers and electronic communication integral to its domain. CAIE publishes original contributions focusing on the development of novel computerized methodologies to address industrial engineering problems. It also highlights the applications of these methodologies to issues within the broader industrial engineering and associated communities. The journal actively encourages submissions that push the boundaries of fundamental theories and concepts in industrial engineering techniques.
期刊最新文献
Robotic disassembly of electric vehicle batteries: Technologies and opportunities A location-sizing and routing model for a biomethane production chain fed by municipal waste A reinforcement learning-driven cooperative scatter search for the knapsack problem with forfeits Ergonomic design of Human-Robot collaborative workstation in the Era of Industry 5.0 Towards sustainable cognitive digital twins: A portfolio management tool for waste mitigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1