"我得到转介是因为没有其他人愿意与这个人合作":对为边缘型人格障碍患者提供护理的社会工作者进行批判现实主义分析

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SSM. Qualitative research in health Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100488
Aman Ahluwalia-Cameron, Adrian Guta, Elizabeth Donnelly
{"title":"\"我得到转介是因为没有其他人愿意与这个人合作\":对为边缘型人格障碍患者提供护理的社会工作者进行批判现实主义分析","authors":"Aman Ahluwalia-Cameron,&nbsp;Adrian Guta,&nbsp;Elizabeth Donnelly","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a mental health condition characterized by unstable relationships, self-image, and emotions, as well as impulsive behaviors and high rates of morbidity and mortality. Provider-based stigmatization of individuals with BPD is associated with poor health outcomes and increased mortality risk. However, little is known about social workers' experiences in providing care to people living with BPD (PLBPD). This study explored social workers' perspectives on the impact of stigma on care for PLBPD. Between April 2020 and January 2021, qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 41 social workers practicing across the continuum of care (e.g., community services and hospitals) in Ontario, Canada. Data were analyzed using Critical Realist Analysis. Four primary themes emerged: (1) stigmatization of PLBPD due to the complexity of their needs (e.g., avoidance, blame, name-calling by providers); (2) lack of BPD-specific training and education in social work curricula; (3) observed stigmatization of PLBPD by social workers and other professionals (e.g., psychologists and physicians); and (4) suggestions for improving care experiences for PLBPD. Results suggest that provider-based stigma remains a significant quality of care issue affecting PLBPD. Further research is needed to understand the scope of these issues among diverse PLBPD populations, within social work practice, and across interprofessional care settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100488"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“I get the referral because nobody else wants to work with this person”: A critical realist analysis of social workers providing care to people living with borderline personality disorder\",\"authors\":\"Aman Ahluwalia-Cameron,&nbsp;Adrian Guta,&nbsp;Elizabeth Donnelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a mental health condition characterized by unstable relationships, self-image, and emotions, as well as impulsive behaviors and high rates of morbidity and mortality. Provider-based stigmatization of individuals with BPD is associated with poor health outcomes and increased mortality risk. However, little is known about social workers' experiences in providing care to people living with BPD (PLBPD). This study explored social workers' perspectives on the impact of stigma on care for PLBPD. Between April 2020 and January 2021, qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 41 social workers practicing across the continuum of care (e.g., community services and hospitals) in Ontario, Canada. Data were analyzed using Critical Realist Analysis. Four primary themes emerged: (1) stigmatization of PLBPD due to the complexity of their needs (e.g., avoidance, blame, name-calling by providers); (2) lack of BPD-specific training and education in social work curricula; (3) observed stigmatization of PLBPD by social workers and other professionals (e.g., psychologists and physicians); and (4) suggestions for improving care experiences for PLBPD. Results suggest that provider-based stigma remains a significant quality of care issue affecting PLBPD. Further research is needed to understand the scope of these issues among diverse PLBPD populations, within social work practice, and across interprofessional care settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000970\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524000970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

边缘型人格障碍(BPD)是一种精神疾病,其特点是人际关系、自我形象和情绪不稳定,行为冲动,发病率和死亡率高。服务提供者对 BPD 患者的污名化与不良的健康结果和更高的死亡风险有关。然而,人们对社会工作者为 BPD 患者(PLBPD)提供护理的经验知之甚少。本研究探讨了社工对污名化对 BPD 患者护理的影响的看法。2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 1 月期间,研究人员对加拿大安大略省的 41 名社工进行了半结构式定性访谈,这些社工从事的是连续性护理工作(如社区服务和医院)。采用批判现实主义分析法对数据进行了分析。得出了四个主要的主题:(1)由于 PLBPD 需求的复杂性而对其产生的污名化(例如,提供者的回避、指责和辱骂);(2)社会工作课程中缺乏针对 BPD 的培训和教育;(3)观察到的社会工作者和其他专业人员(例如,心理学家和医生)对 PLBPD 的污名化;以及(4)改善 PLBPD 护理体验的建议。研究结果表明,基于提供者的污名化仍然是影响 PLBPD 护理质量的一个重要问题。要了解这些问题在不同 PLBPD 群体中、社会工作实践中以及跨专业护理环境中的范围,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“I get the referral because nobody else wants to work with this person”: A critical realist analysis of social workers providing care to people living with borderline personality disorder
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a mental health condition characterized by unstable relationships, self-image, and emotions, as well as impulsive behaviors and high rates of morbidity and mortality. Provider-based stigmatization of individuals with BPD is associated with poor health outcomes and increased mortality risk. However, little is known about social workers' experiences in providing care to people living with BPD (PLBPD). This study explored social workers' perspectives on the impact of stigma on care for PLBPD. Between April 2020 and January 2021, qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 41 social workers practicing across the continuum of care (e.g., community services and hospitals) in Ontario, Canada. Data were analyzed using Critical Realist Analysis. Four primary themes emerged: (1) stigmatization of PLBPD due to the complexity of their needs (e.g., avoidance, blame, name-calling by providers); (2) lack of BPD-specific training and education in social work curricula; (3) observed stigmatization of PLBPD by social workers and other professionals (e.g., psychologists and physicians); and (4) suggestions for improving care experiences for PLBPD. Results suggest that provider-based stigma remains a significant quality of care issue affecting PLBPD. Further research is needed to understand the scope of these issues among diverse PLBPD populations, within social work practice, and across interprofessional care settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
期刊最新文献
Perspectives of Palestinian physicians on the impact of the Gaza War in the West Bank Prenatal care in urban China: Qualitative study on challenges and coping mechanisms Ableism in mental healthcare settings: A qualitative study among U.S. adults with disabilities A methodological review of solicited diaries as a qualitative tool in health research in low- and middle-income countries Reconciling market and moral logics on a minimum wage: Supermarket work in Australia during the first two years of the SARS-COV-2 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1