单中心队列中外周动脉疾病患者血管再通术后的血脂优化

IF 4.3 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American journal of preventive cardiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100761
Franck H. Azobou Tonleu MD
{"title":"单中心队列中外周动脉疾病患者血管再通术后的血脂优化","authors":"Franck H. Azobou Tonleu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>Peripheral Artery Disease</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Lipid management is a cornerstone of peripheral artery disease (PAD) treatment to reduce major adverse cardiac events. The 2018 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines recommended statins, ezetimibe, and/or PCSK9 inhibitors in selected patients to reach a low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) &lt; 70 mg/dL.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The cohort included all patients who underwent their index limb revascularization for PAD between 01/01/2021 and 12/31/2022 at a large urban safety net hospital. The cohort was created using ICD-10 and CPT codes. Lipid lowering medications and LDL-c were abstracted at baseline (prior to index revascularization) and at one year post index discharge. For baseline labs, we used values either prior or during (if no prior value) index revascularization.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final cohort included 311 patients with 36% female, 49% Hispanic, 36% Black, and was 63 ± 10 years old. History of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and type 2 diabetes were seen in 98%, 93%, and 79% of patients, respectively. Prior to revascularization, 78% of patients were on statins (53% high intensity, 22% moderate intensity), 7% on ezetimibe and no patients on PCSK-9i. By one year following revascularization, 94% were on statins (75% high intensity, 18% moderate intensity), 8% on ezetimibe, and no patients on PCSK-9i. Among 233 patients with baseline LDL-c, median was 81 mg/dL with 37% (86/233) with LDL-c &lt; 70 mg/dL. Following revascularization, 132 patients had repeat lipid panel with median LDL-c 65 mg/dL and 55% (73/132) of them with LDL-c &lt; 70 mg/dL.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LDL-c optimization is a cornerstone of PAD management, especially in a post-revascularization population. In this cohort, there was increase in both overall statin use and use of high intensity by 1 year following revascularization. However, only 42% of patients had repeat lipid panel following revascularization and the use of non-statin therapies remained low despite only half achieving targeted LDL-C. These findings highlight an important care gap, and revascularization as an important opportunity for lipid optimization. Clinician education and EHR (Electronic Health Record) interventions could be leveraged to improve outcomes in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100761"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LIPID OPTIMIZATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH PERIPHERAL ARTERY DISEASE FOLLOWING REVASCULARIZATION IN A SINGLE-CENTER COHORT\",\"authors\":\"Franck H. Azobou Tonleu MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>Peripheral Artery Disease</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Lipid management is a cornerstone of peripheral artery disease (PAD) treatment to reduce major adverse cardiac events. The 2018 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines recommended statins, ezetimibe, and/or PCSK9 inhibitors in selected patients to reach a low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) &lt; 70 mg/dL.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The cohort included all patients who underwent their index limb revascularization for PAD between 01/01/2021 and 12/31/2022 at a large urban safety net hospital. The cohort was created using ICD-10 and CPT codes. Lipid lowering medications and LDL-c were abstracted at baseline (prior to index revascularization) and at one year post index discharge. For baseline labs, we used values either prior or during (if no prior value) index revascularization.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final cohort included 311 patients with 36% female, 49% Hispanic, 36% Black, and was 63 ± 10 years old. History of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and type 2 diabetes were seen in 98%, 93%, and 79% of patients, respectively. Prior to revascularization, 78% of patients were on statins (53% high intensity, 22% moderate intensity), 7% on ezetimibe and no patients on PCSK-9i. By one year following revascularization, 94% were on statins (75% high intensity, 18% moderate intensity), 8% on ezetimibe, and no patients on PCSK-9i. Among 233 patients with baseline LDL-c, median was 81 mg/dL with 37% (86/233) with LDL-c &lt; 70 mg/dL. Following revascularization, 132 patients had repeat lipid panel with median LDL-c 65 mg/dL and 55% (73/132) of them with LDL-c &lt; 70 mg/dL.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LDL-c optimization is a cornerstone of PAD management, especially in a post-revascularization population. In this cohort, there was increase in both overall statin use and use of high intensity by 1 year following revascularization. However, only 42% of patients had repeat lipid panel following revascularization and the use of non-statin therapies remained low despite only half achieving targeted LDL-C. These findings highlight an important care gap, and revascularization as an important opportunity for lipid optimization. Clinician education and EHR (Electronic Health Record) interventions could be leveraged to improve outcomes in this population.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100761\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667724001296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667724001296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗领域外周动脉疾病背景血脂管理是治疗外周动脉疾病(PAD)以减少主要不良心脏事件的基石。2018年ACC/AHA胆固醇指南推荐对特定患者使用他汀类药物、依折麦布和/或PCSK9抑制剂,以达到低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-c)< 70 mg/dL.方法队列包括2021年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间在一家大型城市安全网医院因PAD接受指数肢体血管重建术的所有患者。队列使用 ICD-10 和 CPT 编码创建。降脂药物和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇在基线(指数血管再通术前)和指数出院后一年进行抽样。对于基线实验室检查,我们使用了指数血管再通术之前或期间的数值(如果之前没有数值)。结果最终队列包括 311 名患者,其中女性占 36%,西班牙裔占 49%,黑人占 36%,年龄为 63 ± 10 岁。分别有98%、93%和79%的患者有高血压、高脂血症和2型糖尿病史。血管重建前,78%的患者服用他汀类药物(53%为高强度,22%为中等强度),7%服用依折麦布,没有患者服用PCSK-9i。血管再通术后一年,94%的患者服用他汀类药物(75%为高强度,18%为中等强度),8%服用依折麦布,没有患者服用 PCSK-9i。在基线 LDL-c 为 81 mg/dL 的 233 名患者中,37%(86/233)的 LDL-c 为 70 mg/dL。结论 LDL-c 优化是 PAD 管理的基石,尤其是在血管重建后人群中。在该队列中,他汀类药物的总体使用率和高强度使用率在血管再通术后一年都有所上升。然而,只有42%的患者在血管再通后再次进行了血脂检查,尽管只有一半的患者达到了低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的目标值,但非他汀类药物的使用率仍然很低。这些发现凸显了一个重要的护理缺口,而血管再通术则是优化血脂的一个重要机会。临床医生教育和电子病历(EHR)干预措施可用于改善这一人群的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LIPID OPTIMIZATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH PERIPHERAL ARTERY DISEASE FOLLOWING REVASCULARIZATION IN A SINGLE-CENTER COHORT

Therapeutic Area

Peripheral Artery Disease

Background

Lipid management is a cornerstone of peripheral artery disease (PAD) treatment to reduce major adverse cardiac events. The 2018 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines recommended statins, ezetimibe, and/or PCSK9 inhibitors in selected patients to reach a low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) < 70 mg/dL.

Methods

The cohort included all patients who underwent their index limb revascularization for PAD between 01/01/2021 and 12/31/2022 at a large urban safety net hospital. The cohort was created using ICD-10 and CPT codes. Lipid lowering medications and LDL-c were abstracted at baseline (prior to index revascularization) and at one year post index discharge. For baseline labs, we used values either prior or during (if no prior value) index revascularization.

Results

The final cohort included 311 patients with 36% female, 49% Hispanic, 36% Black, and was 63 ± 10 years old. History of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and type 2 diabetes were seen in 98%, 93%, and 79% of patients, respectively. Prior to revascularization, 78% of patients were on statins (53% high intensity, 22% moderate intensity), 7% on ezetimibe and no patients on PCSK-9i. By one year following revascularization, 94% were on statins (75% high intensity, 18% moderate intensity), 8% on ezetimibe, and no patients on PCSK-9i. Among 233 patients with baseline LDL-c, median was 81 mg/dL with 37% (86/233) with LDL-c < 70 mg/dL. Following revascularization, 132 patients had repeat lipid panel with median LDL-c 65 mg/dL and 55% (73/132) of them with LDL-c < 70 mg/dL.

Conclusions

LDL-c optimization is a cornerstone of PAD management, especially in a post-revascularization population. In this cohort, there was increase in both overall statin use and use of high intensity by 1 year following revascularization. However, only 42% of patients had repeat lipid panel following revascularization and the use of non-statin therapies remained low despite only half achieving targeted LDL-C. These findings highlight an important care gap, and revascularization as an important opportunity for lipid optimization. Clinician education and EHR (Electronic Health Record) interventions could be leveraged to improve outcomes in this population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of behavior change techniques in eHealth-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic review Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Patients with Established Cardiovascular Disease Treated with PCSK9 Monoclonal Antibodies Holistic approach to preventive cardiology: Where tradition meets innovation (Fellow's Voice) Latent class analysis of cardiac structure and function and association with premature cardiovascular disease: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study 300,000 quitters and counting; A systematic approach to tobacco cessation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1