脂蛋白(a)对主要不良心血管事件的预后价值与 c 反应蛋白的关系 - 系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 4.3 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American journal of preventive cardiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100783
{"title":"脂蛋白(a)对主要不良心血管事件的预后价值与 c 反应蛋白的关系 - 系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>ASCVD/CVD Risk Factors</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Existing evidence supports an increased risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) with elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) regardless of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels. However, some studies have presented divergent results between primary and secondary prevention populations. A meta-analysis could yield a more definitive estimation of the joint influence of these biomarkers on MACE risk.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a systematic review of studies evaluating the risk of MACE with elevated Lp(a) and hs-CRP (PROSPERO CRD4202345109). The primary outcome was the pooled hazard ratio (HR) of the association between Lp(a) and MACE among individuals with low (&lt;2mg/L) and high (≥2 mg/L) hs-CRP levels. We performed a subgroup analysis in primary and secondary prevention populations. A random effects model was used given the wide heterogeneity in studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of seven studies were identified in the systematic review and included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled sample comprised 558,914 individuals. The mean proportion of females was 37% and the weighted mean age for the entire cohort was 58.9 years. In individuals with elevated Lp(a), the risk of MACE was significantly increased across both low and high hs-CRP groups, with pooled hazard ratios (HR) of 1.24 (95% CI: 1.10–1.41) and 1.33 (95% CI: 1.19–1.49), respectively. In the primary prevention population, the pooled HR for low and high hs-CRP groups was 1.33 (95% CI: 1.06–1.66) and 1.43 (95% CI: 1.13–1.82), respectively, with a nonsignificant subgroup difference (P=0.65). The corresponding HR for the secondary prevention population was 1.10 (95% CI: 1.03–1.18) and 1.31 (95% CI: 1.09–1.57), respectively, with a non-significant subgroup difference (P=0.34) (Figure).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our analysis confirms that elevated Lp(a) significantly elevates MACE risk across varying hs-CRP levels, underlining its relevance in both primary and secondary prevention cohorts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF LIPOPROTEIN(A) FOR MAJOR ADVERSE CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS IN RELATION TO C-REACTIVE PROTEIN - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>ASCVD/CVD Risk Factors</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Existing evidence supports an increased risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) with elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) regardless of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels. However, some studies have presented divergent results between primary and secondary prevention populations. A meta-analysis could yield a more definitive estimation of the joint influence of these biomarkers on MACE risk.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a systematic review of studies evaluating the risk of MACE with elevated Lp(a) and hs-CRP (PROSPERO CRD4202345109). The primary outcome was the pooled hazard ratio (HR) of the association between Lp(a) and MACE among individuals with low (&lt;2mg/L) and high (≥2 mg/L) hs-CRP levels. We performed a subgroup analysis in primary and secondary prevention populations. A random effects model was used given the wide heterogeneity in studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of seven studies were identified in the systematic review and included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled sample comprised 558,914 individuals. The mean proportion of females was 37% and the weighted mean age for the entire cohort was 58.9 years. In individuals with elevated Lp(a), the risk of MACE was significantly increased across both low and high hs-CRP groups, with pooled hazard ratios (HR) of 1.24 (95% CI: 1.10–1.41) and 1.33 (95% CI: 1.19–1.49), respectively. In the primary prevention population, the pooled HR for low and high hs-CRP groups was 1.33 (95% CI: 1.06–1.66) and 1.43 (95% CI: 1.13–1.82), respectively, with a nonsignificant subgroup difference (P=0.65). The corresponding HR for the secondary prevention population was 1.10 (95% CI: 1.03–1.18) and 1.31 (95% CI: 1.09–1.57), respectively, with a non-significant subgroup difference (P=0.34) (Figure).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our analysis confirms that elevated Lp(a) significantly elevates MACE risk across varying hs-CRP levels, underlining its relevance in both primary and secondary prevention cohorts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266666772400151X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266666772400151X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗领域心血管疾病/心血管疾病风险因素背景现有证据表明,无论高敏 C 反应蛋白(hs-CRP)水平如何,脂蛋白(a)(Lp(a))升高都会增加发生重大不良心血管事件(MACE)的风险。然而,一些研究在一级预防人群和二级预防人群之间得出了不同的结果。我们对评估 Lp(a) 和 hs-CRP 升高导致 MACE 风险的研究进行了系统回顾(PROSPERO CRD4202345109)。主要结果是低水平(<2 毫克/升)和高水平(≥2 毫克/升)hs-CRP 患者 Lp(a) 与 MACE 之间相关性的总危险比 (HR)。我们对一级和二级预防人群进行了亚组分析。鉴于研究的异质性较大,我们采用了随机效应模型。结果 在系统综述中确定了七项研究,并将其纳入荟萃分析。汇总样本总数为 558914 人。女性的平均比例为 37%,整个群体的加权平均年龄为 58.9 岁。在脂蛋白(a)升高的人群中,低hs-CRP组和高hs-CRP组的MACE风险均显著增加,汇总危险比(HR)分别为1.24(95% CI:1.10-1.41)和1.33(95% CI:1.19-1.49)。在一级预防人群中,低hs-CRP组和高hs-CRP组的汇总HR分别为1.33(95% CI:1.06-1.66)和1.43(95% CI:1.13-1.82),亚组差异不显著(P=0.65)。我们的分析证实,在不同的 hs-CRP 水平下,Lp(a)升高会显著增加 MACE 风险,这强调了它在一级和二级预防人群中的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF LIPOPROTEIN(A) FOR MAJOR ADVERSE CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS IN RELATION TO C-REACTIVE PROTEIN - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Therapeutic Area

ASCVD/CVD Risk Factors

Background

Existing evidence supports an increased risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) with elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) regardless of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels. However, some studies have presented divergent results between primary and secondary prevention populations. A meta-analysis could yield a more definitive estimation of the joint influence of these biomarkers on MACE risk.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of studies evaluating the risk of MACE with elevated Lp(a) and hs-CRP (PROSPERO CRD4202345109). The primary outcome was the pooled hazard ratio (HR) of the association between Lp(a) and MACE among individuals with low (<2mg/L) and high (≥2 mg/L) hs-CRP levels. We performed a subgroup analysis in primary and secondary prevention populations. A random effects model was used given the wide heterogeneity in studies.

Results

A total of seven studies were identified in the systematic review and included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled sample comprised 558,914 individuals. The mean proportion of females was 37% and the weighted mean age for the entire cohort was 58.9 years. In individuals with elevated Lp(a), the risk of MACE was significantly increased across both low and high hs-CRP groups, with pooled hazard ratios (HR) of 1.24 (95% CI: 1.10–1.41) and 1.33 (95% CI: 1.19–1.49), respectively. In the primary prevention population, the pooled HR for low and high hs-CRP groups was 1.33 (95% CI: 1.06–1.66) and 1.43 (95% CI: 1.13–1.82), respectively, with a nonsignificant subgroup difference (P=0.65). The corresponding HR for the secondary prevention population was 1.10 (95% CI: 1.03–1.18) and 1.31 (95% CI: 1.09–1.57), respectively, with a non-significant subgroup difference (P=0.34) (Figure).

Conclusions

Our analysis confirms that elevated Lp(a) significantly elevates MACE risk across varying hs-CRP levels, underlining its relevance in both primary and secondary prevention cohorts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
期刊最新文献
Optimizing cardiometabolic risk in people living with human immunodeficiency virus: A deep dive into an important risk enhancer Lipoprotein (a) testing patterns among subjects with a measured lipid panel: The Mayo Clinic experience Neutrophil-to-High-Density Lipoprotein Ratio (NHR) and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) as prognostic biomarkers for incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: A comparison study Genetic risk score for coronary artery calcification and its predictive ability for coronary artery disease Sex, ethnicity and language differences in statin prescribing in community health center patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1