自律神经功能紊乱患者与无自律神经功能紊乱患者的动态血压监测比较

IF 4.3 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American journal of preventive cardiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100784
Megan Bach DO
{"title":"自律神经功能紊乱患者与无自律神经功能紊乱患者的动态血压监测比较","authors":"Megan Bach DO","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>Preventive Cardiology Best Practices – clinic operations, team approaches, outcomes research</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Blood pressure (BP) patterns in patients with autonomic dysfunction (AD), particularly those with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), remain an area of limited understanding. Utility in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) among patients with various forms of AD compared to patients without a diagnosis of AD remains unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients referred for ABPM between 1/2019 and 7/2023 for a diagnosis AD with POTS, AD / Orthostatic Intolerance (OI) without POTS, or no AD were reviewed. Patient characteristics and ABPM data were analyzed. Statistical analysis was completed through test of trends. The primary outcome was to compare the incidence of uncontrolled 24-hour BP between patients with AD with POTS to those with AD/OI but without POTS and to those without AD. As a secondary outcome, nocturnal dipping status was assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 243 patients were assessed and 62 (25.5%) had a diagnosis of AD, of which 37 (15.2%) had a diagnosis of POTS. Patients with POTS were predominantly female, younger, and of white ethnicity (Table). ABPM data revealed that 81% of patients with POTS and 73% of patients without AD maintained controlled BP over 24 hours, in contrast to just 24% of those with AD/OI but without POTS (p &lt; 0.001). The mean 24-hour SBP for patients with AD with POTS (117.7 mmHg) and patients without AD (131.3 mmHg) were within normal values, in contrast to the 137.1 mmHg observed in those with AD/OI without POTS (p &lt; 0.001). Abnormal dipping status was prevalent in 51% of the AD with POTS cohort, 68% of the AD/OI without POTS cohort, and 56% of the without AD cohort. Nocturnal non-dipping was prevalent in 46% of the AD with POTS cohort, 36% of the AD/OI without POTS cohort, and 37% of the without AD cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Most patients with AD with POTS, and those without AD, demonstrate normal 24-hour BP readings on ABPM. However, ABPM detected a high incidence of uncontrolled 24-hr BP readings in patients with AD or Orthostatic Intolerance without POTS, prompting discussion of valuable utility of this test in this cohort.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100784"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING IN PATIENTS WITH AUTONOMIC DYSFUNCTION VS PATIENTS WITHOUT AUTONOMIC DYSFUNCTION\",\"authors\":\"Megan Bach DO\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>Preventive Cardiology Best Practices – clinic operations, team approaches, outcomes research</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Blood pressure (BP) patterns in patients with autonomic dysfunction (AD), particularly those with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), remain an area of limited understanding. Utility in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) among patients with various forms of AD compared to patients without a diagnosis of AD remains unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients referred for ABPM between 1/2019 and 7/2023 for a diagnosis AD with POTS, AD / Orthostatic Intolerance (OI) without POTS, or no AD were reviewed. Patient characteristics and ABPM data were analyzed. Statistical analysis was completed through test of trends. The primary outcome was to compare the incidence of uncontrolled 24-hour BP between patients with AD with POTS to those with AD/OI but without POTS and to those without AD. As a secondary outcome, nocturnal dipping status was assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 243 patients were assessed and 62 (25.5%) had a diagnosis of AD, of which 37 (15.2%) had a diagnosis of POTS. Patients with POTS were predominantly female, younger, and of white ethnicity (Table). ABPM data revealed that 81% of patients with POTS and 73% of patients without AD maintained controlled BP over 24 hours, in contrast to just 24% of those with AD/OI but without POTS (p &lt; 0.001). The mean 24-hour SBP for patients with AD with POTS (117.7 mmHg) and patients without AD (131.3 mmHg) were within normal values, in contrast to the 137.1 mmHg observed in those with AD/OI without POTS (p &lt; 0.001). Abnormal dipping status was prevalent in 51% of the AD with POTS cohort, 68% of the AD/OI without POTS cohort, and 56% of the without AD cohort. Nocturnal non-dipping was prevalent in 46% of the AD with POTS cohort, 36% of the AD/OI without POTS cohort, and 37% of the without AD cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Most patients with AD with POTS, and those without AD, demonstrate normal 24-hour BP readings on ABPM. However, ABPM detected a high incidence of uncontrolled 24-hr BP readings in patients with AD or Orthostatic Intolerance without POTS, prompting discussion of valuable utility of this test in this cohort.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100784\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667724001521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667724001521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗领域预防心脏病学最佳实践--诊所运营、团队方法、结果研究背景自律神经功能障碍(AD)患者,尤其是体位性正位性心动过速综合征(POTS)患者的血压(BP)模式仍然是人们了解有限的领域。方法对2019年1月1日至2023年7月7日期间因诊断为AD伴POTS、AD/Orthostatic Intolerance (OI)不伴POTS或无AD而转诊进行ABPM的患者进行回顾性分析。对患者特征和 ABPM 数据进行了分析。通过趋势检验完成了统计分析。主要结果是比较伴有 POTS 的 AD 患者与伴有 AD/OI 但无 POTS 的患者以及无 AD 患者之间 24 小时血压失控的发生率。结果 共对 243 名患者进行了评估,62 人(25.5%)确诊为 AD,其中 37 人(15.2%)确诊为 POTS。POTS 患者主要为女性、年轻人和白人(见表)。ABPM 数据显示,81% 的 POTS 患者和 73% 的无 AD 患者在 24 小时内保持血压受控,而在有 AD/OI 但无 POTS 的患者中,仅有 24% 的患者保持血压受控(p < 0.001)。伴有POTS的AD患者(117.7 mmHg)和无AD患者(131.3 mmHg)的24小时平均SBP均在正常值范围内,而无POTS的AD/OI患者为137.1 mmHg(p <0.001)。在有 POTS 的注意力缺失症患者队列中,51% 的人存在异常滂沱状况;在无 POTS 的注意力缺失症/注意力缺失症患者队列中,68% 的人存在异常滂沱状况;在无注意力缺失症患者队列中,56% 的人存在异常滂沱状况。46%的 AD POTS 患者、36% 的 AD/OI 无 POTS 患者和 37% 的无 AD 患者夜间不跳血。然而,ABPM在患有AD或无POTS的直立性不耐受患者中检测到的不受控制的24小时血压读数发生率很高,这促使人们讨论该检测在这一人群中的实用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPARISON OF AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING IN PATIENTS WITH AUTONOMIC DYSFUNCTION VS PATIENTS WITHOUT AUTONOMIC DYSFUNCTION

Therapeutic Area

Preventive Cardiology Best Practices – clinic operations, team approaches, outcomes research

Background

Blood pressure (BP) patterns in patients with autonomic dysfunction (AD), particularly those with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), remain an area of limited understanding. Utility in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) among patients with various forms of AD compared to patients without a diagnosis of AD remains unknown.

Methods

Patients referred for ABPM between 1/2019 and 7/2023 for a diagnosis AD with POTS, AD / Orthostatic Intolerance (OI) without POTS, or no AD were reviewed. Patient characteristics and ABPM data were analyzed. Statistical analysis was completed through test of trends. The primary outcome was to compare the incidence of uncontrolled 24-hour BP between patients with AD with POTS to those with AD/OI but without POTS and to those without AD. As a secondary outcome, nocturnal dipping status was assessed.

Results

A total of 243 patients were assessed and 62 (25.5%) had a diagnosis of AD, of which 37 (15.2%) had a diagnosis of POTS. Patients with POTS were predominantly female, younger, and of white ethnicity (Table). ABPM data revealed that 81% of patients with POTS and 73% of patients without AD maintained controlled BP over 24 hours, in contrast to just 24% of those with AD/OI but without POTS (p < 0.001). The mean 24-hour SBP for patients with AD with POTS (117.7 mmHg) and patients without AD (131.3 mmHg) were within normal values, in contrast to the 137.1 mmHg observed in those with AD/OI without POTS (p < 0.001). Abnormal dipping status was prevalent in 51% of the AD with POTS cohort, 68% of the AD/OI without POTS cohort, and 56% of the without AD cohort. Nocturnal non-dipping was prevalent in 46% of the AD with POTS cohort, 36% of the AD/OI without POTS cohort, and 37% of the without AD cohort.

Conclusions

Most patients with AD with POTS, and those without AD, demonstrate normal 24-hour BP readings on ABPM. However, ABPM detected a high incidence of uncontrolled 24-hr BP readings in patients with AD or Orthostatic Intolerance without POTS, prompting discussion of valuable utility of this test in this cohort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
期刊最新文献
Under-recognized cardiovascular risk enhancers in women: A call to rethink clinical assessment on risk stratification Unhealthy alcohol use and risk of coronary heart disease among young and middle-aged adults Impact of payer rejections and out-of-pocket costs on patient access to bempedoic acid therapy Inflammatory markers and calcification of coronary arteries, aorta and cardiac valves: Findings from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study Composite cardiovascular risk factor control in US adults with diabetes and relation to social determinants of health: The All of Us research program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1