改进心力衰竭导航员咨询--质量改进倡议

IF 4.3 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American journal of preventive cardiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100791
{"title":"改进心力衰竭导航员咨询--质量改进倡议","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>Heart Failure</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Heart failure (HF) has the highest 30-day rehospitalization rate among medical and surgical conditions. Data shows that HF patients who suffer from a 30-day readmission have worse prognosis at 6-month follow-up. Implementing educational interventions to improve outcome of adherence in HF patients has shown to reduce readmission rates by &gt;15%. Although the means to implement such educational interventions are available, this resource appears grossly underutilized. Preliminary analysis showed that &lt; 15% of patients admitted to advanced heart care with an ICD 10 diagnosis of acute heart failure exacerbation currently to receive an order for HF Navigator consultation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The number of heart failure navigator consults placed on the advanced heart care unit in relation to primary diagnosis of acute heart failure exacerbation was measured. The baseline, measured over several weeks prior to implementation of intervention, was measured to be &lt;15%. Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Cycles were run. The cycles entailed: 1st Provider reeducation that ANY HF admission warrants HF Navigator consultation, 2nd Implementation of a widget making it accessible to follow up if consultation happened, 3rd order set for HF was enforced , which entailed the heart failure navigator order, 4th Distribution of reminder posters, post it's, and emails, 5th Distribution of questionnaire evaluating the main cause of lack of adherence to orders, serving as reminder to utilize the order, 6th educational meeting with the HF Navigator. 7th Information technology guided interventions are currently pending.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The following number of orders for heart failure navigator consultation were noted after each PDSA cycle:1st 16%, 2nd 16%, 3rd 33 %, 4th 39 %, 5th 26%, 6th 50% (Figure 1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Sustained and relevant change requires ongoing education, and improved workflow with utilization of order sets, which equal integrated clinical pathways. Ultimately, information technology support is needed to implement reflex orders, and clinical pathway tools, based on diagnosis, to ensure evidence based healthcare and optimal patient care. Advancements in electronic medical record systems with application of clinical pathways will improve human error and in the long-term safe patient suffering and hospital dollars.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IMPROVEMENT IN HEART FAILURE NAVIGATOR CONSULTATION - A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>Heart Failure</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Heart failure (HF) has the highest 30-day rehospitalization rate among medical and surgical conditions. Data shows that HF patients who suffer from a 30-day readmission have worse prognosis at 6-month follow-up. Implementing educational interventions to improve outcome of adherence in HF patients has shown to reduce readmission rates by &gt;15%. Although the means to implement such educational interventions are available, this resource appears grossly underutilized. Preliminary analysis showed that &lt; 15% of patients admitted to advanced heart care with an ICD 10 diagnosis of acute heart failure exacerbation currently to receive an order for HF Navigator consultation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The number of heart failure navigator consults placed on the advanced heart care unit in relation to primary diagnosis of acute heart failure exacerbation was measured. The baseline, measured over several weeks prior to implementation of intervention, was measured to be &lt;15%. Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Cycles were run. The cycles entailed: 1st Provider reeducation that ANY HF admission warrants HF Navigator consultation, 2nd Implementation of a widget making it accessible to follow up if consultation happened, 3rd order set for HF was enforced , which entailed the heart failure navigator order, 4th Distribution of reminder posters, post it's, and emails, 5th Distribution of questionnaire evaluating the main cause of lack of adherence to orders, serving as reminder to utilize the order, 6th educational meeting with the HF Navigator. 7th Information technology guided interventions are currently pending.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The following number of orders for heart failure navigator consultation were noted after each PDSA cycle:1st 16%, 2nd 16%, 3rd 33 %, 4th 39 %, 5th 26%, 6th 50% (Figure 1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Sustained and relevant change requires ongoing education, and improved workflow with utilization of order sets, which equal integrated clinical pathways. Ultimately, information technology support is needed to implement reflex orders, and clinical pathway tools, based on diagnosis, to ensure evidence based healthcare and optimal patient care. Advancements in electronic medical record systems with application of clinical pathways will improve human error and in the long-term safe patient suffering and hospital dollars.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667724001594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667724001594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗领域心力衰竭背景心力衰竭(HF)是内科和外科疾病中 30 天再住院率最高的疾病。数据显示,30 天再入院的心衰患者在 6 个月随访时预后较差。实施教育干预措施以改善心房颤动患者坚持治疗的效果,已证明可将再入院率降低 15%。虽然实施此类教育干预的手段已经具备,但这一资源似乎严重利用不足。初步分析表明,在入住高级心脏护理病房、ICD 10 诊断为急性心力衰竭加重的患者中,目前有 15%的患者收到了高频导航仪咨询订单。方法测量了高级心脏护理病房中与急性心力衰竭加重的主要诊断相关的心力衰竭导航仪咨询数量。干预措施实施前几周的基线测量结果为<15%。实施了 "计划-实施-研究-行动"(PDSA)循环。这些周期包括:第一阶段,对医疗服务提供者进行再教育,使其认识到任何高血压入院都需要接受高血压导航员的咨询;第二阶段,实施小工具,以便在咨询发生时进行跟踪;第三阶段,执行高血压医嘱,其中包括心衰导航员医嘱;第四阶段,分发提醒海报、海报和电子邮件;第五阶段,分发调查问卷,评估不遵守医嘱的主要原因,提醒患者使用医嘱;第六阶段,与高血压导航员举行教育会议。结果在每个 PDSA 循环后,心衰导航员咨询的医嘱数量如下:第 1 次 16%,第 2 次 16%,第 3 次 33%,第 4 次 39%,第 5 次 26%,第 6 次 50%(图 1)。最终,需要信息技术的支持来实施反射性医嘱和基于诊断的临床路径工具,以确保循证医疗和最佳患者护理。电子病历系统的进步和临床路径的应用将改善人为错误,从长远来看,将减轻患者的痛苦并节约医院的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IMPROVEMENT IN HEART FAILURE NAVIGATOR CONSULTATION - A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE

Therapeutic Area

Heart Failure

Background

Heart failure (HF) has the highest 30-day rehospitalization rate among medical and surgical conditions. Data shows that HF patients who suffer from a 30-day readmission have worse prognosis at 6-month follow-up. Implementing educational interventions to improve outcome of adherence in HF patients has shown to reduce readmission rates by >15%. Although the means to implement such educational interventions are available, this resource appears grossly underutilized. Preliminary analysis showed that < 15% of patients admitted to advanced heart care with an ICD 10 diagnosis of acute heart failure exacerbation currently to receive an order for HF Navigator consultation.

Methods

The number of heart failure navigator consults placed on the advanced heart care unit in relation to primary diagnosis of acute heart failure exacerbation was measured. The baseline, measured over several weeks prior to implementation of intervention, was measured to be <15%. Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Cycles were run. The cycles entailed: 1st Provider reeducation that ANY HF admission warrants HF Navigator consultation, 2nd Implementation of a widget making it accessible to follow up if consultation happened, 3rd order set for HF was enforced , which entailed the heart failure navigator order, 4th Distribution of reminder posters, post it's, and emails, 5th Distribution of questionnaire evaluating the main cause of lack of adherence to orders, serving as reminder to utilize the order, 6th educational meeting with the HF Navigator. 7th Information technology guided interventions are currently pending.

Results

The following number of orders for heart failure navigator consultation were noted after each PDSA cycle:1st 16%, 2nd 16%, 3rd 33 %, 4th 39 %, 5th 26%, 6th 50% (Figure 1).

Conclusions

Sustained and relevant change requires ongoing education, and improved workflow with utilization of order sets, which equal integrated clinical pathways. Ultimately, information technology support is needed to implement reflex orders, and clinical pathway tools, based on diagnosis, to ensure evidence based healthcare and optimal patient care. Advancements in electronic medical record systems with application of clinical pathways will improve human error and in the long-term safe patient suffering and hospital dollars.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
期刊最新文献
Optimizing cardiometabolic risk in people living with human immunodeficiency virus: A deep dive into an important risk enhancer Lipoprotein (a) testing patterns among subjects with a measured lipid panel: The Mayo Clinic experience Neutrophil-to-High-Density Lipoprotein Ratio (NHR) and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) as prognostic biomarkers for incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: A comparison study Genetic risk score for coronary artery calcification and its predictive ability for coronary artery disease Sex, ethnicity and language differences in statin prescribing in community health center patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1