{"title":"社区环境中内科住院医师对心脏康复的认识和转诊率:多中心分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>Rehabilitation</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>In the United States, The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and most insurers authorize coverage for Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) services for patients with stable chronic HF with LVEF ≤35% and NYHA functional class II to IV symptoms despite six weeks of treatment with optimal HF therapy. CR has a Class 1 Recommendation in the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline for managing HF. Community hospitals deal with most of the above two indications, and little data exists about the referral processes in such places.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A questionnaire regarding cardiac rehabilitation, inquiring about internal medicine residents' awareness of indications, components, outcomes, and referral practices, was sent to 5 different community-based institutions. The information was collected anonymously and later analyzed in statistical software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 136 residents, there was more or less equal distribution among the 3 PGY years, with the majority responding of having a cardiac catheterization lab and acknowledging recurrent heart failure admissions to their institutions. Varied responses were received regarding cardiac rehab availability at respective institutions. Surprisingly, despite somewhat adequate knowledge regarding cardiac rehabilitation's indications, components, and outcomes, only 28.68 % acknowledged routine CR referral. Referral rates increased with increasing training years. Further trends are seen in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite numerous studies highlighting the importance of physician referrals for cardiac rehabilitation enrollment, there is limited data on internal medicine residents' knowledge and referral practices. This is pivotal as they often manage a significant portion of patients with acute coronary syndromes and heart failure exacerbations in a community setting. Further research is needed to uncover disparities and improve cardiac rehabilitation utilization in community-based healthcare settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AWARENESS AND REFERRAL RATES OF CARDIAC REHABILITATION AMONG INTERNAL MEDICINE RESIDENTS IN A COMMUNITY SETTING: A MULTICENTER ANALYSIS\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>Rehabilitation</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>In the United States, The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and most insurers authorize coverage for Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) services for patients with stable chronic HF with LVEF ≤35% and NYHA functional class II to IV symptoms despite six weeks of treatment with optimal HF therapy. CR has a Class 1 Recommendation in the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline for managing HF. Community hospitals deal with most of the above two indications, and little data exists about the referral processes in such places.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A questionnaire regarding cardiac rehabilitation, inquiring about internal medicine residents' awareness of indications, components, outcomes, and referral practices, was sent to 5 different community-based institutions. The information was collected anonymously and later analyzed in statistical software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 136 residents, there was more or less equal distribution among the 3 PGY years, with the majority responding of having a cardiac catheterization lab and acknowledging recurrent heart failure admissions to their institutions. Varied responses were received regarding cardiac rehab availability at respective institutions. Surprisingly, despite somewhat adequate knowledge regarding cardiac rehabilitation's indications, components, and outcomes, only 28.68 % acknowledged routine CR referral. Referral rates increased with increasing training years. Further trends are seen in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite numerous studies highlighting the importance of physician referrals for cardiac rehabilitation enrollment, there is limited data on internal medicine residents' knowledge and referral practices. This is pivotal as they often manage a significant portion of patients with acute coronary syndromes and heart failure exacerbations in a community setting. Further research is needed to uncover disparities and improve cardiac rehabilitation utilization in community-based healthcare settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667724001429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667724001429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
治疗领域康复背景在美国,对于 LVEF≤35% 且 NYHA 功能分级为 II 至 IV 级的稳定型慢性心房颤动患者,尽管已接受六周的最佳心房颤动治疗,但 NYHA 功能分级仍为 II 至 IV 级,美国联邦医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心以及大多数保险公司均授权承保心脏康复 (CR) 服务。CR 在当前的美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会心房颤动管理指南中被列为一级推荐项目。方法:我们向 5 家不同的社区机构发送了一份有关心脏康复的调查问卷,询问内科住院医师对心脏康复的适应症、组成部分、结果和转诊做法的认识。结果 在 136 名住院医师中,3 个 PGY 年级的住院医师人数分布大致相同,大多数住院医师回答拥有心导管室,并承认其所在机构经常收治心力衰竭患者。关于各医疗机构是否有心脏康复中心,得到的答复各不相同。令人惊讶的是,尽管对心脏康复的适应症、组成部分和结果有了一定程度的了解,但只有 28.68% 的人承认常规的心脏康复转诊。转诊率随着培训年限的增加而增加。表 1、表 2 和表 3 显示了进一步的趋势。结论尽管许多研究强调了医生转诊对心脏康复注册的重要性,但有关内科住院医师的知识和转诊实践的数据却很有限。这一点至关重要,因为在社区环境中,内科住院医师通常负责管理大部分急性冠状动脉综合征和心衰加重的患者。需要进一步开展研究,以发现差异并提高社区医疗机构中心脏康复的利用率。
AWARENESS AND REFERRAL RATES OF CARDIAC REHABILITATION AMONG INTERNAL MEDICINE RESIDENTS IN A COMMUNITY SETTING: A MULTICENTER ANALYSIS
Therapeutic Area
Rehabilitation
Background
In the United States, The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and most insurers authorize coverage for Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) services for patients with stable chronic HF with LVEF ≤35% and NYHA functional class II to IV symptoms despite six weeks of treatment with optimal HF therapy. CR has a Class 1 Recommendation in the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline for managing HF. Community hospitals deal with most of the above two indications, and little data exists about the referral processes in such places.
Methods
A questionnaire regarding cardiac rehabilitation, inquiring about internal medicine residents' awareness of indications, components, outcomes, and referral practices, was sent to 5 different community-based institutions. The information was collected anonymously and later analyzed in statistical software.
Results
Out of 136 residents, there was more or less equal distribution among the 3 PGY years, with the majority responding of having a cardiac catheterization lab and acknowledging recurrent heart failure admissions to their institutions. Varied responses were received regarding cardiac rehab availability at respective institutions. Surprisingly, despite somewhat adequate knowledge regarding cardiac rehabilitation's indications, components, and outcomes, only 28.68 % acknowledged routine CR referral. Referral rates increased with increasing training years. Further trends are seen in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3.
Conclusions
Despite numerous studies highlighting the importance of physician referrals for cardiac rehabilitation enrollment, there is limited data on internal medicine residents' knowledge and referral practices. This is pivotal as they often manage a significant portion of patients with acute coronary syndromes and heart failure exacerbations in a community setting. Further research is needed to uncover disparities and improve cardiac rehabilitation utilization in community-based healthcare settings.